The reason why orthopaedic surgeons perform total knee replacement: results of a randomised study using case vignettes

W C Verra, K Q Witteveen, A B Maier, M G J Gademan, H M J van der Linden, R G H H Nelissen, W C Verra, K Q Witteveen, A B Maier, M G J Gademan, H M J van der Linden, R G H H Nelissen

Abstract

Purpose: End-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) results in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery. The decision to perform TKA is not well defined, resulting in variation of indications among orthopaedic surgeons. Non-operative treatment measures are often not extensively used. Aim of this study was to investigate factors influencing the decision to perform TKA by Dutch orthopaedic surgeons.

Methods: Three case vignettes, each case divided into two versions, being identical except for information on age (younger and older age), pain (mild and severe pain) or radiological OA (low and high grade) were developed. A questionnaire including these three case vignettes was sent to 599 Dutch orthopaedic surgeons, who were randomised to either one of the two versions. The orthopaedic surgeons were asked whether TKA would be the next step in treatment. Furthermore, from a list of patient factors they were asked how strong these factors would influence the decision to perform TKA.

Results: 54 % of the orthopaedic surgeons completed the questionnaire (n = 326). Orthopaedic surgeons indicated to perform TKA significantly more often at higher age (73.3 vs. 45.5 %, p < 0.001). In the presence of mild pain, orthopaedic surgeons were slightly more reluctant to perform a TKA compared to severe pain (57.0 vs. 64.0 %, n.s.). Mild radiological OA made surgeons more reluctant to perform TKA compared to severe OA (9.7 vs. 96.9 %, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Old age and severe radiological OA are variables which are considered to be important in the decision to perform a TKA. Pain symptoms of moderate or severe pain are unequivocal when considering a TKA.

Level of evidence: Economic/decision analysis, Level III.

Keywords: Age; Indication; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Total knee replacement.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart participating orthopaedic surgeons
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Modifying factors affecting the decision to perform TKA (n = 326)

References

    1. Ackerman IN, Dieppe PA, March LM, Roos EM, Nilsdotter AK, Brown GC, et al. Variation in age and physical status prior to total knee and hip replacement surgery: a comparison of centers in Australia and Europe. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:166–173. doi: 10.1002/art.24215.
    1. Arden N, Nevitt MC. Osteoarthritis: epidemiology. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006;20:3–25. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.09.007.
    1. Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, et al. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2012;379:1331–1340. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6.
    1. Dreinhofer KE, Dieppe P, Sturmer T, Grober-Gratz D, Floren M, Gunther KP, et al. Indications for total hip replacement: comparison of assessments of orthopaedic surgeons and referring physicians. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:1346–1350. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.047811.
    1. Fortin PR, Penrod JR, Clarke AE, St-Pierre Y, Joseph L, Belisle P, et al. Timing of total joint replacement affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:3327–3330. doi: 10.1002/art.10631.
    1. Foster JA, Salinas GD, Manseel D, Williamson JC, Casebeer LL. How does older age influence oncologists’ cancer management? Oncologist. 2010;15:584–592. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0198.
    1. Gossec L, Paternotte S, Maillefert LF, Combescure C, Conaghan PG, Davis AM, et al. The role of pain and functional impairment in the decision to recommend total joint replacement in hip and knee osteoarthritis: an international cross-sectional study of 1909 patients. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2011;19:147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.10.025.
    1. Hawker GA, Guan J, Croxford Coyte PC, Glazier RH, Harvey BJ, et al. A prospective population-based study of the predictors of undergoing total joint arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:3212–3220. doi: 10.1002/art.22146.
    1. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Suarez-Alma ME. Determinants of function after total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther. 2003;83:696–706.
    1. Judge A, Arden NK, Cooper C, Kassim Javaid M, Carr AJ, Field RE, et al. Predictors of outcomes of total knee replacement surgery. Rheumatology. 2012;51:1804–1813. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes075.
    1. Julin J, Jamsen E, Puolokka T, Konttinen YT, Moilanen T. Younger age increases the risk of early prosthesis failure following primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. A follow-up study of 32,019 total knee replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:413–419. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.501747.
    1. Kennedy LG, Newman JH, Akroyd CE, Dieppe PA. When should we do knee replacements? Knee. 2003;10:3212–3220. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0160(02)00138-2.
    1. Keurentjes JC, Fiocco M, So-Osman C, Onstenk R, Koopman-van Gemert AW, Poll RG, et al. Patients with severe radiographic osteoarthritis have a better prognosis in physical functioning after hip and knee replacement: a cohort study. PLoS One. 2013;8:4.
    1. Koskinen E, Eskelinen A, Paavolainen P, Pulkkinen P, Remes V. Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: a follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:499–507. doi: 10.1080/17453670710015490.
    1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
    1. Lofvendahl S, Bizjajeva S, Ranstam J, Lidgren L. Indications for hip and knee replacement in Sweden. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17:251–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01430.x.
    1. Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten (Dutch Registry of Orthopedic Implants)
    1. Maillefert JF, Roy C, Cadet C, Nizard R, Berdah L, Ravaud P. Factors influencing surgeons’ decisions in the indication for total joint replacement in hip osteoarthritis in real life. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:255–262. doi: 10.1002/art.23331.
    1. Mancuso CA, Ranawat CS, Esdaile JM, Johanson NA, Charlson ME. Indications for total hip and total knee arthroplasties. Results of orthopaedic surveys. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:34–46. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(96)80159-8.
    1. Minns Lowe CJ, Barker KL, Dewey M, Sackley CM. Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise after knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2007;335:812. doi: 10.1136/.
    1. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Osteoarthritis.
    1. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
    1. Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. Knee arthroplasty: Are patient’s expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop. 2009;80:55–61. doi: 10.1080/17453670902805007.
    1. Otten R, van Roermund PM, Picavet HS. Trends in the number of knee and hip arthroplasties: considerably more knee and hip prostheses due to osteoarthritis in 2030. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:1534.
    1. Peterson MG, Hollenberg JP, Szatrowski TP, Johanson NA, Mancuso CA, Charlson ME. Geographic variation in the rates of elective total hip and knee arthroplasties among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1530–1539.
    1. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty. A report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop. 2000;71:262–267. doi: 10.1080/000164700317411852.
    1. Skou ST, Roos EM, Laursen MB, Rathleff MS, Nielsen LA, Simonsen O, et al. A randomized controlled trial of total knee replacement. N Eng J Med. 2015;373:1597–1606. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505467.
    1. Toivanen AT, Arokoski JP, Manninen PS, Heliovaara M, Haara MM, Tyrvainen E, et al. Agreement between clinical and radiological methods of diagnosing knee osteoarthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2007;36:58–63. doi: 10.1080/03009740600759886.
    1. van Saase JL, van Romunde LK, Cats A, Vandenbroucke JP, Valkenburg HA. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer survey. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other populations. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989;48:271–280. doi: 10.1136/ard.48.4.271.
    1. Zeni JA, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Clinical predictors of elective total joint replacement in persons with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-86.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera