Proteomic mechanistic profile of patients with diabetes at risk of developing heart failure: insights from the HOMAGE trial

Job A J Verdonschot, João Pedro Ferreira, Pierpaolo Pellicori, Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca, Andrew L Clark, Franco Cosmi, Joe Cuthbert, Nicolas Girerd, Beatrice Mariottoni, Johannes Petutschnigg, Patrick Rossignol, John G F Cleland, Faiez Zannad, Stephane R B Heymans, HOMAGE “Heart Omics in AGEing” consortium, Job A J Verdonschot, João Pedro Ferreira, Pierpaolo Pellicori, Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca, Andrew L Clark, Franco Cosmi, Joe Cuthbert, Nicolas Girerd, Beatrice Mariottoni, Johannes Petutschnigg, Patrick Rossignol, John G F Cleland, Faiez Zannad, Stephane R B Heymans, HOMAGE “Heart Omics in AGEing” consortium

Abstract

Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at increased risk of developing heart failure (HF). The "Heart OMics in AGEing" (HOMAGE) trial suggested that spironolactone had beneficial effect on fibrosis and cardiac remodelling in an at risk population, potentially slowing the progression towards HF. We compared the proteomic profile of patients with and without diabetes among patients at risk for HF in the HOMAGE trial.

Methods: Protein biomarkers (n = 276) from the Olink®Proseek-Multiplex cardiovascular and inflammation panels were measured in plasma collected at baseline and 9 months (or last visit) from HOMAGE trial participants including 217 patients with, and 310 without, diabetes.

Results: Twenty-one biomarkers were increased and five decreased in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetics at baseline. The markers clustered mainly within inflammatory and proteolytic pathways, with granulin as the key-hub, as revealed by knowledge-induced network and subsequent gene enrichment analysis. Treatment with spironolactone in diabetic patients did not lead to large changes in biomarkers. The effects of spironolactone on NTproBNP, fibrosis biomarkers and echocardiographic measures of diastolic function were similar in patients with and without diabetes (all interaction analyses p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Amongst patients at risk for HF, those with diabetes have higher plasma concentrations of proteins involved in inflammation and proteolysis. Diabetes does not influence the effects of spironolactone on the proteomic profile, and spironolactone produced anti-fibrotic, anti-remodelling, blood pressure and natriuretic peptide lowering effects regardless of diabetes status. Trial registration NCT02556450.

Keywords: Biomarker; Diabetes; Fibrosis; Heart failure; Spironolactone.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose with regards to the content of this manuscript.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Network of protein biomarkers which were significant differentially detected in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetics. Knowledge-based induced network with the plasma protein biomarkers which were significantly increased or decreased in diabetic patients (FDRq 

Fig. 2

Overrepresented pathways of protein biomarkers…

Fig. 2

Overrepresented pathways of protein biomarkers in diabetic patients when compared to non-diabetic patients.…

Fig. 2
Overrepresented pathways of protein biomarkers in diabetic patients when compared to non-diabetic patients. The gene ontology (GO) biological processes are used as reference. Additional file 1: Table S2 contains further details on the proteins in these pathways

Fig. 3

Summary of the study design…

Fig. 3

Summary of the study design and results

Fig. 3
Summary of the study design and results
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overrepresented pathways of protein biomarkers in diabetic patients when compared to non-diabetic patients. The gene ontology (GO) biological processes are used as reference. Additional file 1: Table S2 contains further details on the proteins in these pathways
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary of the study design and results

References

    1. Domanski M, Krause-Steinrauf H, Deedwania P, Follmann D, Ghali JK, Gilbert E, Haffner S, Katz R, Lindenfeld J, Lowes BD, et al. The effect of diabetes on outcomes of patients with advanced heart failure in the BEST trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(5):914–922. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00856-8.
    1. Beijer K, Nowak C, Sundström J, Ärnlöv J, Fall T, Lind L. In search of causal pathways in diabetes: a study using proteomics and genotyping data from a cross-sectional study. Diabetologia. 2019;62(11):1998–2006. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4960-8.
    1. Molvin J, Pareek M, Jujic A, Melander O, Råstam L, Lindblad U, Daka B, Leósdóttir M, Nilsson PM, Olsen MH, et al. Using a targeted proteomics chip to explore pathophysiological pathways for incident diabetes—the Malmö preventive project. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):272. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36512-y.
    1. Tromp J, Voors AA, Sharma A, Ferreira JP, Ouwerkerk W, Hillege HL, Gomez KA, Dickstein K, Anker SD, Metra M, et al. Distinct pathological pathways in patients with heart failure and diabetes. JACC Heart Fail. 2020;8(3):234–242. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.11.005.
    1. Pellicori P, Ferreira JP, Mariottoni B, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Ahmed FZ, Verdonschot J, Collier T, Cuthbert JJ, Petutschnigg J, Mujaj B, et al. Effects of spironolactone on serum markers of fibrosis in people at high risk of developing heart failure: rationale, design and baseline characteristics of a proof-of-concept, randomised, precision-medicine, prevention trial. The Heart OMics in AGing (HOMAGE) trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22(9):1711–1723. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1716.
    1. Cleland JGF, Ferreira JP, Mariottoni B, Pellicori P, Cuthbert J, Verdonschot JAJ, Petutschnigg J, Ahmed FZ, Cosmi F, Brunner La Rocca H-P, et al. The effect of spironolactone on cardiovascular function and markers of fibrosis in people at increased risk of developing heart failure: the heart ‘OMics’ in AGEing (HOMAGE) randomized clinical trial. Eur Heart J. 2020;42(6):684–696. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa758.
    1. Davies JI, Band M, Morris A, Struthers AD. Spironolactone impairs endothelial function and heart rate variability in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2004;47(10):1687–1694. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1510-8.
    1. Yamaji M, Tsutamoto T, Kawahara C, Nishiyama K, Yamamoto T, Fujii M, Horie M. Effect of eplerenone versus spironolactone on cortisol and hemoglobin A1(c) levels in patients with chronic heart failure. Am Heart J. 2010;160(5):915–921. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.024.
    1. Ferreira JP, Verdonschot J, Wang P, Pizard A, Collier T, Ahmed FZ, Brunner-La-Rocca H-P, Clark AL, Cosmi F, Cuthbert J, et al. Proteomic and mechanistic analysis of spironolactone in patients at risk for HF. JACC Heart Fail. 2021;9(4):268–277. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.11.010.
    1. Ago T, Sadoshima J. GDF15, a cardioprotective TGF-beta superfamily protein. Circ Res. 2006;98(3):294–297. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000207919.83894.9d.
    1. Sharma A, Stevens SR, Lucas J, Fiuzat M, Adams KF, Whellan DJ, Donahue MP, Kitzman DW, Piña IL, Zannad F, et al. Utility of growth differentiation factor-15, a marker of oxidative stress and inflammation, in chronic heart failure: insights from the HF-ACTION study. JACC Heart Fail. 2017;5(10):724–734. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.07.013.
    1. Day EA, Ford RJ, Smith BK, Mohammadi-Shemirani P, Morrow MR, Gutgesell RM, Lu R, Raphenya AR, Kabiri M, McArthur AG, et al. Metformin-induced increases in GDF15 are important for suppressing appetite and promoting weight loss. Nat Metab. 2019;1(12):1202–1208. doi: 10.1038/s42255-019-0146-4.
    1. Coll AP, Chen M, Taskar P, Rimmington D, Patel S, Tadross JA, Cimino I, Yang M, Welsh P, Virtue S, et al. GDF15 mediates the effects of metformin on body weight and energy balance. Nature. 2020;578(7795):444–448. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1911-y.
    1. Dominguez-Rodriguez A, Abreu-Gonzalez P, Avanzas P. Usefulness of growth differentiation factor-15 levels to predict diabetic cardiomyopathy in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(6):890–894. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.06.020.
    1. Tromp J, Westenbrink BD, Ouwerkerk W, van Veldhuisen DJ, Samani NJ, Ponikowski P, Metra M, Anker SD, Cleland JG, Dickstein K, et al. Identifying pathophysiological mechanisms in heart failure with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(10):1081–1090. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.050.
    1. Feng X, Guan D, Auen T, Choi JW, Salazar Hernández MA, Lee J, Chun H, Faruk F, Kaplun E, Herbert Z, et al. IL1R1 is required for celastrol’s leptin-sensitization and antiobesity effects. Nat Med. 2019;25(4):575–582. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0358-x.
    1. Liu J, Ibi D, Taniguchi K, Lee J, Herrema H, Akosman B, Mucka P, Salazar Hernandez MA, Uyar MF, Park SW, et al. Inflammation improves glucose homeostasis through IKKβ-XBP1s interaction. Cell. 2016;167(4):1052–1066.e1018. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.015.
    1. Wernstedt Asterholm I, Tao C, Morley TS, Wang QA, Delgado-Lopez F, Wang ZV, Scherer PE. Adipocyte inflammation is essential for healthy adipose tissue expansion and remodeling. Cell Metab. 2014;20(1):103–118. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.05.005.
    1. Hoes MF, Tromp J, Ouwerkerk W, Bomer N, Oberdorf-Maass SU, Samani NJ, Ng LL, Lang CC, van der Harst P, Hillege H, et al. The role of cathepsin D in the pathophysiology of heart failure and its potentially beneficial properties: a translational approach. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;22(11):2102–2111. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1674.
    1. Ding L, Goossens GH, Oligschlaeger Y, Houben T, Blaak EE, Shiri-Sverdlov R. Plasma cathepsin D activity is negatively associated with hepatic insulin sensitivity in overweight and obese humans. Diabetologia. 2020;63(2):374–384. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-05025-2.
    1. Eguchi A, Feldstein AE. Lysosomal cathepsin D contributes to cell death during adipocyte hypertrophy. Adipocyte. 2013;2(3):170–175. doi: 10.4161/adip.24144.
    1. Tryggestad JB, Shah RD, Braffett BH, Bacha F, Gidding SS, Gubitosi-Klug RA, Shah AS, Urbina EM, Levitt Katz LE. Circulating adhesion molecules and associations with HbA1c, hypertension, nephropathy, and retinopathy in the treatment options for type 2 diabetes in adolescent and youth study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2020;21(6):923–931. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13062.
    1. Zemlin AE, Matsha TE, Kengne AP, Hon GM, Erasmus RT. Correlation of E-selectin concentrations with carotid intima-media thickness and cardio-metabolic profile of mixed ancestry South Africans: a cross-sectional study. Ann Clin Biochem. 2017;54(1):92–100. doi: 10.1177/0004563216640001.
    1. Sass C, Pallaud C, Zannad F, Visvikis S. Relationship between E-selectin L/F554 polymorphism and blood pressure in the Stanislas cohort. Hum Genet. 2000;107(1):58–61. doi: 10.1007/s004390000325.
    1. Matsubara T, Mita A, Minami K, Hosooka T, Kitazawa S, Takahashi K, Tamori Y, Yokoi N, Watanabe M, Matsuo E, et al. PGRN is a key adipokine mediating high fat diet-induced insulin resistance and obesity through IL-6 in adipose tissue. Cell Metab. 2012;15(1):38–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.12.002.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera