Fatal isoniazid-induced hepatitis. Its risk during chemoprophylaxis

S R Salpeter, S R Salpeter

Abstract

Isoniazid chemoprophylaxis has long been known to be a highly effective means of preventing silent tuberculous infections from spreading to active disease. There has been much controversy, however, about the risk it carries for fatal hepatotoxicity. In this article I review the rate of fatal isoniazid-induced hepatitis during chemoprophylaxis that is done according to current monitoring guidelines. Information was obtained from a MEDLINE literature search and a survey of tuberculosis control officers in large metropolitan areas throughout the country. Data were included of patients who were monitored according to the American Thoracic Society's guidelines or who were treated after 1983 when the guidelines were published. The pooled results of the published studies showed no hepatotoxic deaths in 20,212 patients in whom prophylaxis was started. The unpublished data showed 2 deaths in 182,285 patients, for a combined rate of 0.001% (2 of 202,497). The death rate for those older than 35 years was estimated to be 0.002% (1 of 43,334). This rate is significantly lower than was previously estimated and should be used to reevaluate the benefit of preventive therapy for tuberculin-reactive patients older than 35. The risk of fatal isoniazid-induced hepatitis is negligible for all ages when patients are routinely monitored for liver toxicity.

References

    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1974 Nov;110(5):581-4
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Oct;142(4):848-53
    1. Can Med Assoc J. 1976 Apr 3;114(7):607-11
    1. J Pediatr. 1976 Jul;89(1):133-5
    1. Med J Aust. 1978 Feb 11;1(3):165-9
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978 Jun;117(6):991-1001
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978 Oct;118(4):794-6
    1. JAMA. 1979 Mar 23;241(12):1239-41
    1. Arch Dis Child. 1979 Jan;54(1):65-7
    1. Arch Surg. 1979 May;114(5):597-9
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1980 Jun;121(6):1039-44
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1981 Jun;94(6):808-13
    1. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1981 Sep;3(3):271-9
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984 Jan;129(1):58-61
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986 Mar;133(3):431-6
    1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986 Nov;34(11):814-7
    1. JAMA. 1986 Nov 21;256(19):2709-13
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Dec;107(6):843-5
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 Jan;137(1):215-20
    1. Chest. 1988 Jul;94(1):138-41
    1. Am J Prev Med. 1988 Mar-Apr;4(2):102-9
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Apr;139(4):867-70
    1. Public Health Rep. 1989 Mar-Apr;104(2):151-5
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Sep;140(3):700-5
    1. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1989 Sep;8(9):649-50
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Oct;140(4):1001-6
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Nov;140(5):1194-7
    1. J Am Coll Health. 1990 Jan;38(4):165-70
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 May;141(5 Pt 1):1232-5
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Dec;150(12):2517-22
    1. Md Med J. 1991 Sep;40(9):793-7
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Dec;144(6):1357-60
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Feb;145(2 Pt 1):494-7
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Mar;152(3):547-50
    1. West J Med. 1992 Oct;157(4):421-4
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1969 Dec;71(6):1113-20
    1. Bibl Tuberc. 1970;26:28-106
    1. JAMA. 1972 Jun 12;220(11):1471-3
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1972 Sep;106(3):357-65
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1973 Apr;107(4):523-9
    1. JAMA. 1974 Jul 29;229(5):528-33
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1974 Aug;81(2):200-2
    1. Md State Med J. 1974 Nov;23(11):64-7
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 May;141(5 Pt 1):1236-40
    1. Chest. 1975 Aug;68(2):181-90

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera