Quantifying dermal microcirculatory changes of neuropathic and neuroischemic diabetic foot ulcers using spatial frequency domain imaging: a shade of things to come?

Grant A Murphy, Rajinder P Singh-Moon, Amaan Mazhar, David J Cuccia, Vincent L Rowe, David G Armstrong, Grant A Murphy, Rajinder P Singh-Moon, Amaan Mazhar, David J Cuccia, Vincent L Rowe, David G Armstrong

Abstract

Introduction: The use of non-invasive vascular and perfusion diagnostics are an important part of assessing lower extremity ulceration and amputation risk in patients with diabetes mellitus. Methods for detecting impaired microvascular vasodilatory function in patients with diabetes may have the potential to identify sites at risk of ulceration prior to clinically identifiable signs. Spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) uses patterned near-infrared and visible light spectroscopy to determine tissue oxygen saturation and hemoglobin distribution within the superficial and deep dermis, showing distinct microcirculatory and oxygenation changes that occur prior to neuropathic and neuroischemic ulceration.

Research designs and methods: 35 patients with diabetes mellitus and a history of diabetic foot ulceration were recruited for monthly imaging with SFDI. Two patients who ulcerated during the year-long longitudinal study were selected for presentation of their clinical course alongside the dermal microcirculation biomarkers from SFDI.

Results: Patient 1 developed a neuropathic ulcer portended by a focal increase in tissue oxygen saturation and decrease in superficial papillary hemoglobin concentration 3 months prior. Patient 2 developed bilateral neuroischemic ulcers showing decreased tissue oxygen saturation and increased superficial papillary and deep dermal reticular hemoglobin concentrations.

Conclusions: Wounds of different etiology show unique dermal microcirculatory changes prior to gross ulceration. Before predictive models can be developed from SFDI, biomarker data must be correlated with the clinical course of patients who ulcerate while being followed longitudinally.

Trial registration number: NCT03341559.

Keywords: biosensing techniques; foot ulcer; hemoglobins; vascular surgical procedures.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RPS-M, AM and DJC are full-time employees of Modulim and have financial interests in the company. Modulim is commercializing SFDI technology.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) technology for plantar foot imaging. (A) SFDI uses a combination of visible and near-infrared light to interrogate tissue and recover functional circulation characteristics. (B) Diagram illustrating SFDI characterization of tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) and stratified hemoglobin content (HbT1 and HbT2). HbT1 represents total hemoglobin levels originating from superficial microvasculature while HbT2 represents the subsurface macrovascular total hemoglobin levels.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Longitudinal microcirculatory monitoring for patient 1. Spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) biomarker profiles of the plantar forefoot are shown at weeks 0 (A), 13 (B) and 50 (C). Visual inspection of color images at week 0 show a seemingly innocuous appearance, however focal areas of elevated StO2 and decreased HbT1 at the second metatarsal phalangeal joint (MTPJ) bilaterally suggest a latent issue. At wound presentation (right second MTPJ) 13 weeks later, StO2 remains elevated within the peri-wound region coupled with rising HbT1. At week 50 on visible healing postosteotomy, StO2 and HbT1 signatures exhibited reduced focal activity near the right second MTPJ with a shift toward the third MTPJ. Numbers at the base of each foot represent forefoot median values. Numbers near dashed circles represent median values over the circumscribed region.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Longitudinal microcirculatory monitoring for patient 2 (left foot). Spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) biomarker profiles of the plantar forefoot are shown at weeks 9 (A), 18 (B), 37 (C), 46 (D) and 50 (E). At week 9, the hallux exhibited general signs of hyperemia and blood pooling as indicated by superficial (HbT1) and subsurface hemoglobin (HbT2), respectively. The pre-ulcer redness at the hallux tip coincided with focally elevated StO2 and reduced HbT1. Signatures of hyperemia and pooling persisted at week 18 throughout hallux ischemic wound presentation. Gangrene presentation at week 37 showed poor oxygenation surrounding the wound site and progressive hyperemia and pooling in the subhallux region. At week 46 following left popliteal artery to DVAA bypass, the eventually spreading of gangrene to the medial forefoot and lesser digits was forecasted by substantially low StO2 in these regions. At week 50, 2 weeks following TMA, signs of circulatory restoration were observed as indicated by a re-normalization of StO2 and HbT2 values. Numbers at the base of each foot represent forefoot median values. DVAA, dorsal venous arch arterialization; TMA, transmetatarsal amputation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Longitudinal microcirculatory monitoring for patient 2 (right foot). Spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) biomarker profiles of the plantar forefoot are shown at weeks 9 (A), 18 (B) and 37 (C). At week 9, redness at the hallux tip coincided with hyperemia and pooling of blood as indicated by superficial (HbT1) and subsurface hemoglobin (HbT2), respectively. General hallux signatures of hyperemia and pooling persisted at week 18 throughout ischemic wound presentation coupled with substantially low oxygenation (StO2) localized at the tip. The peri-wound region demonstrated elevated StO2 and reduced HbT1. With gangrenous wound progression at week 37, an extension of the poorly oxygenated region was observed with further elevation of HbT1 and HbT2. Numbers at the base of each foot represent forefoot median values. Numbers near dashed circles represent median values over the circumscribed region.

References

    1. Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2367–75. 10.1056/NEJMra1615439
    1. Driver VR, Fabbi M, Lavery LA, et al. . The costs of diabetic foot: the economic case for the limb salvage team. J Vasc Surg 2010;52:17S–22. 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.003
    1. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Vela SA, et al. . Choosing a practical screening instrument to identify patients at risk for diabetic foot ulceration. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:289–92. 10.1001/archinte.158.3.289
    1. Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, Cohen V, et al. . Prediction of diabetic foot ulcer occurrence using commonly available clinical information: the Seattle diabetic foot study. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1202–7. 10.2337/dc05-2031
    1. Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Vela SA, et al. . Practical criteria for screening patients at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:157–62. 10.1001/archinte.158.2.157
    1. McGill M, Molyneaux L, Yue DK. Which diabetic patients should receive podiatry care? an objective analysis. Intern Med J 2005;35:451–6. 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00880.x
    1. Lazzarini PA, Pacella RE, Armstrong DG, et al. . Diabetes-Related lower-extremity complications are a leading cause of the global burden of disability. Diabet Med 201810.1111/dme.13680. [Epub ahead of print: 23 May 2018].
    1. Zhang Y, Lazzarini PA, McPhail SM, et al. . Global disability burdens of diabetes-related lower-extremity complications in 1990 and 2016. Diabetes Care 2020;43:964–74. 10.2337/dc19-1614
    1. Waaijman R, de Haart M, Arts MLJ, et al. . Risk factors for plantar foot ulcer recurrence in neuropathic diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1697–705. 10.2337/dc13-2470
    1. Yudovsky D, Nouvong A, Schomacker K, et al. . Assessing diabetic foot ulcer development risk with hyperspectral tissue oximetry. J Biomed Opt 2011;16:026009. 10.1117/1.3535592
    1. Saiko G, Lombardi P, Au Y, et al. . Hyperspectral imaging in wound care: a systematic review. Int Wound J 2020:1–17.
    1. Beckman JA, Duncan MS, Damrauer SM, et al. . Microvascular disease, peripheral artery disease, and amputation. Circulation 2019;140:449–58. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040672
    1. Monteiro-Soares M, Boyko EJ, Ribeiro J, et al. . Predictive factors for diabetic foot ulceration: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2012;28:574–600. 10.1002/dmrr.2319
    1. Lee S, Mey L, Szymanska AF, et al. . SFDI biomarkers provide a quantitative ulcer risk metric and can be used to predict diabetic foot ulcer onset. J Diabetes Complications 2020;34:107624. 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107624
    1. Gioux S, Mazhar A, Cuccia DJ. Spatial frequency domain imaging in 2019: principles, applications, and perspectives. J Biomed Opt 2019;24:1–18. 10.1117/1.JBO.24.7.071613
    1. Nguyen JT, Lin SJ, Tobias AM, et al. . A novel pilot study using spatial frequency domain imaging to assess oxygenation of perforator flaps during reconstructive breast surgery. Ann Plast Surg 2013;71:308–15. 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31828b02fb
    1. Ponticorvo A, Rowland R, Baldado M, et al. . Evaluating clinical observation versus spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI), laser speckle imaging (LSI) and thermal imaging for the assessment of burn depth. Burns 2019;45:450–60. 10.1016/j.burns.2018.09.026
    1. Weinkauf C, Mazhar A, Vaishnav K, et al. . Near-instant noninvasive optical imaging of tissue perfusion for vascular assessment. J Vasc Surg 2019;69:555–62. 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.202
    1. Armstrong DG, Mills JL. Juggling risk to reduce amputations: the three-ring Circus of infection, ischemia and tissue loss-dominant conditions. Wound Medicine 2013;1:13–14. 10.1016/j.wndm.2013.03.002
    1. Conte MS, Bradbury AW, Kolh P, et al. . Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019;58:e33:S1–109. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.006
    1. Mills JL, Conte MS, Armstrong DG, et al. . The Society for vascular surgery lower extremity threatened limb classification system: risk stratification based on wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI). J Vasc Surg 2014;59:e1-2:220–34. 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.003
    1. Khan T, Plotkin A, Magee GA, et al. . Functional ambulatory status as a potential adjunctive decision-making tool following wound, level of ischemia, and severity of foot infection assessment. J Vasc Surg 2020;72:738–46. 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.064
    1. Oyibo SO, Jude EB, Tarawneh I, et al. . A comparison of two diabetic foot ulcer classification systems: the wagner and the University of Texas wound classification systems. Diabetes Care 2001;24:84–8. 10.2337/diacare.24.1.84
    1. Sowa MG, Kuo W-C, Ko AC-T, et al. . Review of near-infrared methods for wound assessment. J Biomed Opt 2016;21:091304. 10.1117/1.JBO.21.9.091304
    1. Boyd RB, Burke JP, Atkin J, et al. . Significance of capillary basement membrane changes in diabetes mellitus. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1990;80:307–13. 10.7547/87507315-80-6-307
    1. Lefrandt JD, Bosma E, Oomen PHN, et al. . Sympathetic mediated vasomotion and skin capillary permeability in diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy. Diabetologia 2003;46:40–7. 10.1007/s00125-002-1004-5
    1. Ngo BT, Hayes KD, DiMiao DJ, et al. . Manifestations of cutaneous diabetic microangiopathy. Am J Clin Dermatol 2005;6:225–37. 10.2165/00128071-200506040-00003
    1. Van Dam PS, Cotter MA, Bravenboer B, et al. . Pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy: focus on neurovascular mechanisms. Eur J Pharmacol 2013;719:180–6. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.07.017
    1. Vouillarmet J, Josset-Lamaugarny A, Michon P, et al. . Neurovascular response to pressure in patients with diabetic foot ulcer. Diabetes 2019;68:db180694–836. 10.2337/db18-0694
    1. Argarini R, McLaughlin RA, Joseph SZ, et al. . Visualizing and quantifying cutaneous microvascular reactivity in humans by use of optical coherence tomography: impaired dilator function in diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2020;319:E923–31. 10.1152/ajpendo.00233.2020
    1. Pitei DL, Lord M, Foster A, et al. . Plantar pressures are elevated in the neuroischemic and the neuropathic diabetic foot. Diabetes Care 1999;22:1966–70. 10.2337/diacare.22.12.1966
    1. Houlind K, Christensen J, Hallenberg C, et al. . Early results from an angiosome-directed open surgical technique for venous arterialization in patients with critical lower limb ischemia. Diabet Foot Ankle 2013;4. 10.3402/dfa.v4i0.22713. [Epub ahead of print: 17 Dec 2013].
    1. Rowe VL, Hood DB, Lipham J, et al. . Initial experience with dorsal venous arch arterialization for limb salvage. Ann Vasc Surg 2002;16:187–92. 10.1007/s10016-001-0148-y

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera