Women's empowerment through homestead food production in rural Bangladesh

Sarah Dupuis, Monique Hennink, Amanda S Wendt, Jillian L Waid, Md Abul Kalam, Sabine Gabrysch, Sheela S Sinharoy, Sarah Dupuis, Monique Hennink, Amanda S Wendt, Jillian L Waid, Md Abul Kalam, Sabine Gabrysch, Sheela S Sinharoy

Abstract

Background: Women in rural Bangladesh face multiple, inter-related challenges including food insecurity, malnutrition, and low levels of empowerment. We aimed to investigate the pathway towards empowerment experienced by women participating in a three-year nutrition-sensitive homestead food production (HFP) program, which was evaluated through the Food and Agricultural Approaches to Reducing Malnutrition (FAARM) cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Methods: We conducted 44 in-depth interviews and 12 focus group discussions with men and women in both intervention and control communities of the FAARM study site in rural, north-eastern Bangladesh. Using a modified grounded theory approach to data collection and analysis, we developed a framework to explain the pathway towards empowerment among HFP program participants.

Results: The analysis and resulting framework identified seven steps towards empowerment: 1) receiving training and materials; 2) establishing home gardens and rearing poultry; 3) experiencing initial success with food production; 4) generating social or financial resources; 5) expanding agency in household decision-making; 6) producing renewable resources (e.g. farm produce) and social resources; and 7) sustaining empowerment. The most meaningful improvements in empowerment occurred among participants who were able to produce food beyond what was needed for household consumption and were able to successfully leverage these surplus resources to gain higher bargaining power in their household. Additionally, women used negotiation skills with their husbands, fostered social support networks with other women, and developed increased self-efficacy and motivation. Meanwhile, the least empowered participants lacked support in critical areas, such as support from their spouses, social support networks, or sufficient space or time to produce enough food to meaningfully increase their contribution and therefore bargaining power within their household.

Conclusions: This study developed a novel framework to describe a pathway to empowerment among female participants in an HFP intervention, as implemented in the FAARM trial. These results have implications for the design of future nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions, which should prioritize opportunities to increase empowerment and mitigate the barriers identified in our study.

Trial registration: FAARM is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02505711 ).

Keywords: Agency; Agriculture; Empowerment; Gender; Nutrition-sensitive.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pathway to empowerment through a homestead food production program

References

    1. National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), and ICF International . Bangladesh demographic and health survey 2017–18. Dhaka, Bangladesh and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIPORT and ICF; 2020.
    1. Sinharoy SS, Waid JL, Haardörfer R, Wendt A, Gabrysch S, Yount KM. Women’s dietary diversity in rural Bangladesh: pathways through women’s empowerment. Maternal & Child Nutrition. 2017;14(1). 10.1111/mcn.12489.
    1. Sraboni E, Quisumbing A. Women’s empowerment in agriculture and dietary quality across the life course: evidence from Bangladesh. Food Policy. 2018;81:21–36. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.09.001.
    1. Sraboni E, Quisumbing AR, Ahmed AU. The women’s empowerment in agriculture index for Bangladesh’s feed the future zone of influence. Project report submitted to the US Agency for International Development. Dhaka: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2012. p. 1–25.
    1. Cunningham K, Ploubidis GB, Menon P, Ruel M, Kadiyala S, Uauy R, Ferguson E. Women’s empowerment in agriculture and child nutritional status in rural Nepal. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(17):3134–3125. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000683.
    1. Quisumbing AR, Sproule K, Martinez EM, Malapit H. Women’s empowerment in agriculture and nutritional outcomes: evidence from six countries in Africa and Asia. IFPRI discussion paper 01930. 2020.
    1. Santoso MV, Bezner Kerr R, Hoddinott J, Garigipati P, Olmos S, Young SL. Role of women’s empowerment in child nutrition outcomes: a systematic review. Adv Nutr. 2019;00:1–14. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz056.
    1. Johnson M, Balagamwala M, Pinkstaff C, Theis S, Meinzen-Dick R, Quisumbing A. How do agricultural development projects empower women? Linking strategies with expected outcomes. J Gend Agric Food Secur. 2018;3(2):1–19.
    1. Wendt AS, Sparling TM, Waid JL, Mueller AA, Gabrysch S. Food and agricultural approaches to reducing malnutrition (FAARM): protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a homestead food production programme on undernutrition in rural Bangladesh. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7). 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031037.
    1. Haselow NJ, Stormer A, Pries A. Evidence-based evolution of an integrated nutrition-focused agriculture approach to address the underlying determinants of stunting. Matern Child Nutr. 2016;12:155–168. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12260.
    1. Hillenbrand E. Transforming gender in homestead food production. Gend Dev. 2010;18(3):411–425. doi: 10.1080/13552074.2010.521987.
    1. Heckert J, Olney DK, Ruel MT. Is women's EMPOWERMENT a pathway to improving child nutrition outcomes in a nutrition-sensitive agriculture program?: evidence from a randomized controlled trial in Burkina Faso. Soc Sci Med. 2019;233:93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.016.
    1. Van Eerdewijk A, Wong F, Vaast C, Newton J, Tyszler M, Pennington A. White paper: a conceptual model of women and girls’ empowerment. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute (KIT); 2017.
    1. Kabeer N. Resources, agency, achievements: reflections on the measurement of Womens empowerment. Dev Chang. 1999;30(3):435–464. doi: 10.1111/1467-7660.00125.
    1. Hennink MM, Hutter I, Bailey A. Qualitative research methods. Los Angeles: Sage; 2010.
    1. Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation. Qual Health Res. 2016;27(4):591–608. doi: 10.1177/1049732316665344.
    1. Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Weber MB. What influences saturation? Estimating sample sizes in focus group research. Qual Health Res. 2019;29(10):1483–1496. doi: 10.1177/1049732318821692.
    1. McMahon SA, Winch PJ. Systematic debriefing after qualitative encounters: an essential analysis step in applied qualitative research. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3:e000837. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000837.
    1. VERBI Software . MAXQDA 2020 [computer software] Berlin: VERBI Software. Available from ; 2019.
    1. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Oxon, London: Routledge; 2017.
    1. Glaser BG, Holton J. Remodeling grounded theory. Forum Qual Sozialforschung / Forum: Qual Soc Res. 2004;5(2). 10.17169/fqs-5.2.607.
    1. Donald A, Koolwal G, Annan J, Falb K, Goldstein M. Measuring women’s agency. Feminist Econ. 2020;26(3):200–26.
    1. Strecher VJ, Devellis BM, Becker MH, Rosenstock IM. The role of self-efficacy in achieving health behavior change. Health Educ Q. 1986;13(1):73–92. doi: 10.1177/109019818601300108.
    1. Doss C. Intrahousehold bargaining and resource allocation in developing countries. World Bank Res Obs. 2013;28(1):52–78. doi: 10.1093/wbro/lkt001.
    1. Harris-Fry H, Shrestha N, Costello A, Saville NM. Determinants of intra-household food allocation between adults in South Asia – a systematic review. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1). 10.1186/s12939-017-0603-171.
    1. Van den Bold M, Quisumbing AR, Gillespie S. Women’s empowerment and nutrition: an evidence review: SSRN Electronic Journal; 2013. 10.2139/ssrn.2343160.
    1. Katz E. The intra-household economics of voice and exit. Fem Econ. 1997;3(3):25–46. doi: 10.1080/135457097338645.
    1. Gammage S, Kabeer N, Rodgers YV. Voice and agency: where are we now? Fem Econ. 2015;22(1):1–29. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2015.1101308.
    1. Head SK, Yount KM, Hennink MM, Sterk CE. Customary and contemporary resources for women’s empowerment in Bangladesh. Dev Pract. 2015;25(3):360–374. doi: 10.1080/09614524.2015.1019338.
    1. Kabeer N. Between affiliation and autonomy: navigating pathways of Womens empowerment and gender justice in rural Bangladesh. Dev Chang 2011. 42(2):499–528. 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01703.x.
    1. Kjeldsberg C, Shrestha N, Patel M, Davis D, Mundy G, Cunningham C. Nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions and gender dynamics: a qualitative study in Nepal. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14(3). 10.1111/mcn.12593.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera