Evaluation of the impact of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of glasdegib in otherwise healthy volunteers

Naveed Shaik, Robert R LaBadie, Brian Hee, Geoffrey Chan, Naveed Shaik, Robert R LaBadie, Brian Hee, Geoffrey Chan

Abstract

Purpose: Glasdegib is being developed for indications in myeloid malignancies. The effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single, oral, 100-mg glasdegib dose under fasted conditions was assessed.

Methods: Open-label, parallel-group study (NCT03596567). Participants of good general health were selected and categorized, based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate, into normal (≥ 90 mL/min), moderate (≥ 30 to < 60 mL/min), or severe (< 30 mL/min) renal impairment groups. Blood samples were collected up to 120 h post-dose. PK exposure parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis.

Results: All 18 participants completed the study. Respectively, ratios of adjusted geometric means (90% confidence interval) for glasdegib area under the curve from time 0 to infinity and peak plasma concentration versus normal participants were 205% (142-295%) and 137% (97-193%) in the moderate group, and 202% (146-281%) and 120% (77-188%) in the severe group. Glasdegib median time to peak plasma concentration was 2.0 h in both impairment groups and 1.5 h in the normal group. Mean oral clearance was decreased by approximately 50% in both renal impairment groups compared with the normal group. The plasma-free fraction of glasdegib was not altered by renal impairment. Five all-causality adverse events were reported in three participants; two were considered treatment-related.

Conclusion: The similar changes in exposure observed for participants with renal impairment, coupled with the known safety data from clinical experience, suggest that a lower starting dose of glasdegib may not be required for moderate or severe renal impairment.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03596567 (started May 17, 2018).

Keywords: Glasdegib; Pharmacokinetics; Renal impairment; Safety.

Conflict of interest statement

Drs N. Shaik, R. LaBadie, B. Hee, and G. Chan were employees of Pfizer during this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Linear and b semi-logarithmic scales of median plasma glasdegib concentration–time profiles following a single 100-mg oral dose. The lower limit of quantification was 3 ng/mL
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Regression plots of plasma glasdegib CL/F versus a eGFR and b CrCl following a single 100-mg oral dose. The solid line is the predicted line of the response variable. The shadow area is 90% confidence region for the response variable. Treatment group indicates the degree of renal impairment. a Day –1 eGFR calculated from MDRD equation is used in this presentation. Cl = 3.06 + 0.08 × eGFR; R = 0.5524835197; slope p value = 0.0006. b Day –1 CrCl calculated from C-G formula is used in this presentation. Cl = 3.09 + 0.07 × CrCl; R = 0.4550467229; slope p value = 0.0030. BSA body surface area, C-G Cockcroft–Gault, Cl clearance, CL/F apparent clearance of total drug from plasma, CrCl creatinine clearance, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, MDRD modification of diet in renal disease
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Overall survival by renal impairment and normal renal function in patients with AML or high-risk MDS in BRIGHT MDS & AML 1003. AML acute myeloid leukemia, CI confidence interval, MDS myelodysplastic syndrome, OS overall survival

References

    1. Xie J, Bartels CM, Barton SW, Gu D. Targeting hedgehog signaling in cancer: research and clinical developments. Onco Targets Ther. 2013;6:1425–1435. doi: 10.2147/ott.s34678.
    1. Merchant AA, Matsui W. Targeting Hedgehog–a cancer stem cell pathway. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:3130–3140. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-2846.
    1. Ingham PW, McMahon AP. Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles. Genes Dev. 2001;15:3059–3087. doi: 10.1101/gad.938601.
    1. Campbell V, Copland M. Hedgehog signaling in cancer stem cells: a focus on hematological cancers. Stem Cells Cloning. 2015;8:27–38. doi: 10.2147/SCCAA.S58613.
    1. Sari IN, Phi LTH, Jun N, Wijaya YT, Lee S, Kwon HY. Hedgehog signaling in cancer: a prospective therapeutic target for eradicating cancer stem cells. Cells. 2018;7:208. doi: 10.3390/cells7110208.
    1. Munchhof MJ, Li Q, Shavnya A, Borzillo GV, Boyden TL, Jones CS, LaGreca SD, Martinez-Alsina L, Patel N, Pelletier K, Reiter LA, Robbins MD, Tkalcevic GT. Discovery of PF-04449913, a potent and orally bioavailable inhibitor of Smoothened. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2012;3:106–111. doi: 10.1021/ml2002423.
    1. European Medicines Agency (2018) Public summary of opinion on orphan designation: glasdegib maleate. . Accessed 18 March 2019
    1. US Food and Drug Administration (2018) Highlights of prescribing information: DAURISMO. . Accessed 18 March 2019
    1. European Medicines Agency (2020) Daurismo (glasdegib): Summary of opinion (initial authorisation). . Accessed 14 May 2020
    1. Martinelli G, Oehler VG, Papayannidis C, Courtney R, Shaik MN, Zhang X, O’Connell A, McLachlan KR, Zheng X, Radich J, Baccarani M, Kantarjian HM, Levin WJ, Cortes JE, Jamieson C. Treatment with PF-04449913, an oral Smoothened antagonist, in patients with myeloid malignancies: a phase 1 safety and pharmacokinetics study. Lancet Haematol. 2015;2:e339–e346. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00096-4.
    1. Lam JL, Vaz A, Hee B, Liang Y, Yang X, Shaik MN. Metabolism, excretion and pharmacokinetics of [(14)C]glasdegib (PF-04449913) in healthy volunteers following oral administration. Xenobiotica. 2017;47:1064–1076. doi: 10.1080/00498254.2016.1261307.
    1. Shaik MN, LaBadie RR, Rudin D, Levin WJ. Evaluation of the effect of food and ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of the Smoothened inhibitor PF-04449913 in healthy volunteers. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;74:411–418. doi: 10.1007/s00280-014-2502-0.
    1. Lin S, Shaik N, Martinelli G, Wagner AJ, Cortes J, Ruiz-Garcia A. Population pharmacokinetics of glasdegib in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;60:605–616. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1556.
    1. European Medicines Agency (2015) Guideline on the evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of medicinal products in patients with decreased renal function. . Accessed 14 August 2019
    1. Cortes JE, Douglas Smith B, Wang ES, Merchant A, Oehler VG, Arellano M, DeAngelo DJ, Pollyea DA, Sekeres MA, Robak T, Ma WW, Zeremski M, Naveed Shaik M, Douglas Laird A, O’Connell A, Chan G, Schroeder MA. Glasdegib in combination with cytarabine and daunorubicin in patients with AML or high-risk MDS: phase 2 study results. Am J Hematol. 2018;93:1301–1310. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25238.
    1. Cortes JE, Heidel FH, Hellmann A, Fiedler W, Smith BD, Robak T, Montesinos P, Pollyea DA, DesJardins P, Ottmann O, Ma WW, Shaik MN, Laird AD, Zeremski M, O’Connell A, Chan G, Heuser M. Randomized comparison of low-dose cytarabine with or without glasdegib in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia. 2019;33:379–389. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0312-9.
    1. Shaik N, Hee B, Wei H, LaBadie RR. Evaluation of the effects of formulation, food, or a proton-pump inhibitor on the pharmacokinetics of glasdegib (PF-04449913) in healthy volunteers: a randomized phase I study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019;83:463–472. doi: 10.1007/s00280-018-3748-8.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera