Pain pressure threshold of a muscle tender spot increases following local and non-local rolling massage

S J Aboodarda, A J Spence, Duane C Button, S J Aboodarda, A J Spence, Duane C Button

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to determine the acute effect of rolling massage on pressure pain threshold (PPT) in individuals with tender spots in their plantar flexor muscles.

Methods: In a randomized control trial and single blinded study, tender spots were identified in 150 participants' plantar flexor muscles (gastrocnemius or soleus). Then participants were randomly assigned to one of five intervention groups (n = 30): 1) heavy rolling massage on the calf that exhibited the higher tenderness (Ipsi-R), 2) heavy rolling massage on the contralateral calf (Contra-R), 3) light stroking of the skin with roller massager on the calf that exhibited the higher tenderness (Sham), 4) manual massage on the calf that exhibited the higher tenderness (Ipsi-M) and 5) no intervention (Control). PPT was measured at 30 s and up to 15 min post-intervention via a pressure algometer.

Results: At 30 s post-intervention, the Ipsi-R (24 %) and Contra-R (21 %) demonstrated higher (p < 0.03) PPT values compared with Control and Sham. During 15 min post-intervention, PPT was higher (p < 0.05) following Ipsi-R (19.2 %), Contra-R (15.9 %) and Ipsi-M (10.9 %) compared with Control. There was no difference between the effects of three deep tissue massages (Ipsi-R, Ipsi-M and Contra-R) on PPT.

Discussion: Whereas the increased PPT following ipsilateral massage (Ipsi-R and Ipsi-M) might be attributed to the release of fibrous adhesions; the non-localized effect of rolling massage on the contralateral limb suggests that other mechanisms such as a central pain-modulatory system play a role in mediation of perceived pain following brief tissue massage.

Conclusion: Overall, rolling massage over a tender spot reduces pain perception.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02528812 ), August 19(th), 2015.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Experimental design. PPT: Pressure pain threshold, Ipsi-R: heavy rolling massage on the calf that exhibited the higher tenderness, Con-R: heavy rolling massage on the calf of the contralateral limb, Sham: light stroking of the skin with roller massager on the calf that exhibited the higher tenderness, Ipsi-M: manual massage on the calf that exhibited the higher tenderness, and Control: no intervention
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) values (mean and SE) pre- and 30s post-intervention (n = 150, 30 per group). # denotes that the PPT value was significantly greater than 3rd to 6th trials (p < 0.01)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) values (mean and SE) 30s post-intervention depicted as a percentage of pre-intervention value for each intervention group (n = 150, 30 per group). Ipsi-R: heavy rolling massage on the calf that exhibited the higher tenderness, Contra-R: heavy rolling massage on the calf of the contralateral limb, Sham: light stroking of the skin with roller massager on the calf that exhibited the higher tenderness, Ipsi-M: manual massage on the calf that exhibited the higher tenderness, and Control: no intervention. * denotes that the PPT was greater than Sham. † denotes that the PPT was greater than Control
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) values (mean and SE) depicted as a percentage of pre-intervention value for each intervention group (n = 75, 15 per group) up to 15 min post-intervention. Ipsi-R: heavy rolling massage on the calf that exhibited the higher tenderness, Contra-R: heavy rolling massage on the calf of the contralateral limb, Sham: light stroking of the skin with roller massager on the calf that exhibited the higher tenderness, Ipsi-M: manual massage on the calf that exhibited the higher tenderness, and Control: no intervention. # denotes significant main effects for five time points. § denotes significant main effect for five interventions

References

    1. Schleip R. Fascial plasticity–a new neurobiological explanation: part 1. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2003;7(1):11–9. doi: 10.1016/S1360-8592(02)00067-0.
    1. Schleip R. Fascial plasticity–a new neurobiological explanation: Part 2. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2003;7(2):104–16. doi: 10.1016/S1360-8592(02)00076-1.
    1. Meseguer AA, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Navarro-poze JL, Blanco RC, Bosca Gandia JJ. Intermediate effects of the strain counterstrain technique in local pain evoked by tender points in the upper trapezius muscle. Clin Chiropr. 2006;9:112–8. doi: 10.1016/j.clch.2006.06.003.
    1. Weerapong P, Hume PA, Kolt GS. The mechanisms of massage and effects on performance, muscle recovery and injury prevention. Sports Med. 2005;35(3):235–56. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200535030-00004.
    1. Han SC, Harrison P. Myofascial pain syndrome and trigger-point management. Reg Anesth. 1997;22(1):89–101. doi: 10.1016/S1098-7339(06)80062-3.
    1. Kutner JS, Smith MC, Corbin L, Hemphill L, Benton K, Mellis BK, et al. Massage therapy versus simple touch to improve pain and mood in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(6):369–79. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-6-200809160-00003.
    1. Lund I. Massage as a pain relieving method. Physiotherapy. 2000;86(12):638–9. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61300-4.
    1. Okamoto T, Masuhara M, Ikuta K. Acute effects of self-myofascial release using a foam roller on arterial function. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(1):69–73. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31829480f5.
    1. Renan-Ordine R, Alburquerque-Sendin F, de Souza DP, Cleland JA, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Effectiveness of myofascial trigger point manual therapy combined with a self-stretching protocol for the management of plantar heel pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(2):43–50. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3504.
    1. Shah S, Bhalara A. Myofascial release. Inter J Health Sci Res. 2012;2(2):69–77.
    1. Curran PF, Fiore RD, Crisco JJ. A comparison of the pressure exerted on soft tissue by 2 myofascial rollers. J Sport Rehabil. 2008;17(4):432–42. doi: 10.1123/jsr.17.4.432.
    1. Healey KC, Hatfield DL, Blanpied P, Dorfman LR, Riebe D. The effects of myofascial release with foam rolling on performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(1):61–8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182956569.
    1. Macdonald GZ, Button DC, Drinkwater EJ, Behm DG. Foam rolling as a recovery tool after an intense bout of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(1):131–42. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a123db.
    1. Vaughan B, McLaughlin P. Immediate changes in pressure pain threshold in the iliotibial band using a myofascial (foam) roller. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2014;21:569–74. doi: 10.12968/ijtr.2014.21.12.569.
    1. Sullivan KM, Silvey DB, Button DC, Behm DG. Roller-massager application to the hamstrings increases sit-and-reach range of motion within five to ten seconds without performance impairments. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013;8(3):228–36.
    1. Pearcey GE, Bradbury-Squires DJ, Kawamoto JE, Drinkwater EJ, Behm DG, Button DC. Foam rolling for delayed-onset muscle soreness and recovery of dynamic performance measures. J Athl Train. 2015;50(1):5–13. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-50.1.01.
    1. Bradbury-Squires DJ, Noftall JC, Sullivan KM, Behm DG, Power KE, Button DC. Roller-massager application to the quadriceps and knee-joint range of motion and neuromuscular efficiency during a lunge. J Athl Train. 2015;50(2):133–40. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.5.03.
    1. Antonaci F, Sand T, Lucas GA. Pressure algometry in healthy subjects: inter-examiner variability. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1998;30(1):3–8. doi: 10.1080/003655098444255.
    1. Chesterton LS, Foster NE, Wright CC, Baxter GD, Barlas P. Effects of TENS frequency, intensity and stimulation site parameter manipulation on pressure pain thresholds in healthy human subjects. Pain. 2003;106(1–2):73–80. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00292-6.
    1. Fischer AA. Pressure algometry over normal muscles. Standard values, validity and reproducibility of pressure threshold. Pain. 1987;30(1):115–26. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90089-3.
    1. Kosek E, Ekholm J, Hansson P. Increased pressure pain sensibility in fibromyalgia patients is located deep to the skin but not restricted to muscle tissue. Pain. 1995;63(3):335–9. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00061-5.
    1. Reeves JL, Jaeger B, Graff-Radford SB. Reliability of the pressure algometer as a measure of myofascial trigger point sensitivity. Pain. 1986;24(3):313–21. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90117-X.
    1. Ohrbach R, Gale EN. Pressure pain thresholds in normal muscles: reliability, measurement effects, and topographic differences. Pain. 1989;37(3):257–63. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90189-9.
    1. Wolff BB, Jarvik ME. Relationship between superficial and deep somatic thresholds of pain with a note on handedness. Am J Psychol. 1964;77:589–99. doi: 10.2307/1420769.
    1. Sisto SA, Dyson-Hudson T. Dynamometry testing in spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Develop. 2007;44(1):123–36. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2005.11.0172.
    1. Granges G, Littlejohn G. Pressure pain threshold in pain-free subjects, in patients with chronic regional pain syndromes, and in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 1993;36(5):642–6. doi: 10.1002/art.1780360510.
    1. Frey Law LA, Evans S, Knudtson J, Nus S, Scholl K, Sluka KA. Massage reduces pain perception and hyperalgesia in experimental muscle pain: a randomized, controlled trial. J Pain. 2008;9(8):714–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.03.009.
    1. Rolke R, Andrews Campbell K, Magerl W, Treede RD. Deep pain thresholds in the distal limbs of healthy human subjects. Eur J Pain. 2005;9(1):39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.04.001.
    1. Halperin I, Aboodarda SJ, Button DC, Andersen LL, Behm DG. Roller massager improves range of motion of plantar flexor muscles without subsequent decreases in force parameters. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(1):92–102.
    1. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–8. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420.
    1. Hendricks WA, Robey KW. The sampling distribution of the coefficient of variation. Ann Math Stat. 1936;7(3):129–32. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177732503.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
    1. Riley JL, 3rd, Robinson ME, Wise EA, Myers CD, Fillingim RB. Sex differences in the perception of noxious experimental stimuli: a meta-analysis. Pain. 1998;74(2–3):181–7. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00199-1.
    1. Mense S. Neurobiological concepts of fibromyalgia–the possible role of descending spinal tracts. Scand J Rheumatol Supp. 2000;113:24–9. doi: 10.1080/030097400446599.
    1. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965;150(3699):971–9. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971.
    1. Moayedi M, Davis KD. Theories of pain: from specificity to gate control. J Neurophysiol. 2013;109(1):5–12. doi: 10.1152/jn.00457.2012.
    1. Kostopoulos D, Nelson J, Arthur J, Ingber RS, Larkin RW. Reduction of spontaneous electrical activity and pain perception of trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle through trigger point compression and passive stretching. J Muscoskel Pain. 2008;16(4):266–78. doi: 10.1080/10582450802479594.
    1. Hanten WP, Olson SL, Butts NL, Nowicki AL. Effectiveness of a home program of ischemic pressure followed by sustained stretch for treatment of myofascial trigger points. Phys Ther. 2000;80(10):997–1003.
    1. Le Bars D, Villanueva L, Bouhassira D, Willer JC. Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) in animals and in man. Patol Fiziol Eksp Ter. 1992;4:55–65.
    1. Sigurdsson A, Maixner W. Effects of experimental and clinical noxious counterirritants on pain perception. Pain. 1994;57(3):265–75. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90002-7.
    1. Borg-Stein J, Simons DG. Focused review: myofascial pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(3 Suppl 1):S40–7. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.32155.
    1. Simons DG. Myofascial pain syndrome due to trigger points. International Rehabilitation Medicine Association. 1987.
    1. Lucas N, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Moran R, Bogduk N. Reliability of physical examination for diagnosis of myofascial trigger points: a systematic review of the literature. Clin J Pain. 2009;25(1):80–9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31817e13b6.
    1. Myburgh C, Larsen AH, Hartvigsen J. A systematic, critical review of manual palpation for identifying myofascial trigger points: evidence and clinical significance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(6):1169–76. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.033.
    1. Kosek E, Ekholm J, Hansson P. Pressure pain thresholds in different tissues in one body region. The influence of skin sensitivity in pressure algometry. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1999;31(2):89–93. doi: 10.1080/003655099444597.
    1. Mense S. Descending antinociception and fibromyalgia. Z Rheumatol. 1998;57(2):23–6. doi: 10.1007/s003930050229.
    1. Lee KM, Lee J, Chung CY, Ahn S, Sung KH, Kim TW, et al. Pitfalls and important issues in testing reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients in orthopaedic research. Clin Orthop Surg. 2012;4(2):149–55. doi: 10.4055/cios.2012.4.2.149.
    1. Brennum J, Kjeldsen M, Jensen K, Jensen TS. Measurements of human pressure-pain thresholds on fingers and toes. Pain. 1989;38(2):211–7. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90240-6.
    1. Jensen K, Andersen HO, Olesen J, Lindblom U. Pressure-pain threshold in human temporal region. Evaluation of a new pressure algometer. Pain. 1986;25(3):313–23. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90235-6.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera