Cross-sectional area measurements versus volumetric assessment of the quadriceps femoris muscle in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

Magda Marcon, Bernhard Ciritsis, Christoph Laux, Daniel Nanz, Thi Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim, Michael A Fischer, Gustav Andreisek, Erika J Ulbrich, Magda Marcon, Bernhard Ciritsis, Christoph Laux, Daniel Nanz, Thi Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim, Michael A Fischer, Gustav Andreisek, Erika J Ulbrich

Abstract

Objective: Our aim was to validate the use of cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements at multiple quadriceps muscle levels for estimating the total muscle volume (TMV), and to define the best correlating measurement level.

Methods: Prospective institutional review board (IRB)-approved study with written informed patient consent. Thighs of thirty-four consecutive patients with ACL-reconstructions (men, 22; women, 12) were imaged at 1.5-T using three-dimensional (3D) spoiled dual gradient-echo sequences. CSA was measured at three levels: 15, 20, and 25 cm above the knee joint line. TMV was determined using dedicated volumetry software with semiautomatic segmentation. Pearson's correlation and regression analysis (including standard error of the estimate, SEE) was used to compare CSA and TMV.

Results: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) for the CSA was 60.6 ± 12.8 cm(2) (range, 35.6-93.4 cm(2)), 71.1 ± 15.1 cm(2) (range, 42.5-108.9 cm(2)) and 74.2 ± 17.1 cm(2) (range, 40.9-115.9 cm(2)) for CSA-15, CSA-20 and CSA-25, respectively. The mean ± SD quadriceps' TMV was 1949 ± 533.7 cm(3) (range, 964.0-3283.0 cm(3)). Pearson correlation coefficient was r = 0.835 (p < 0.01), r = 0.906 (p < 0.01), and r = 0.956 (p < 0.01) for CSA-15, CSA-20 and CSA-25, respectively. Corresponding SEE, expressed as percentage of the TMV, were 15.2%, 11.6% and 8.1%, respectively.

Conclusion: The best correlation coefficient between quadriceps CSA and TMV was found for CSA-25, but its clinical application to estimate the TMV is limited by a relatively large SEE.

Key points: • Cross-sectional area was used to estimate QFM size in patients with ACL-reconstruction • A high correlation coefficient exists between quadriceps CSA and volume • Best correlation was seen 25 cm above the knee joint line • A relatively large standard error of the estimate limits CSA application.

References

    1. Eur Radiol. 2009 Aug;19(8):2033-40
    1. Radiology. 2013 Feb;266(2):555-63
    1. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Jun;25(3):301-7
    1. Invest Radiol. 2010 Aug;45(8):465-70
    1. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Aug;23(4):431-42
    1. Radiology. 1987 Aug;164(2):531-7
    1. Am J Sports Med. 1984 May-Jun;12(3):192-5
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Mar;33(3):402-7
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1992;65(5):438-44
    1. Br J Sports Med. 1997 Mar;31(1):59-64
    1. Br J Sports Med. 2004 Jun;38(3):295-9
    1. Muscle Nerve. 1999 Jul;22(7):831-9
    1. Radiographics. 2009 Jan-Feb;29(1):231-60
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):1047-53
    1. Eur J Clin Invest. 1984 Aug;14(4):282-7
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Nov;30(5):1116-23
    1. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Jun;20(6):532-40
    1. Magn Reson Med. 1991 Jan;17(1):82-94
    1. J Biomech. 2005 Apr;38(4):685-93
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Nov;13(8):632-7
    1. J Anat. 1991 Jun;176:139-56
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):2117-27
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999 Jan;86(1):195-201
    1. Radiology. 1984 Oct;153(1):189-94
    1. Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
    1. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2008 Jun;11(3):281-90
    1. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;28(2):88-96
    1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Apr 29;14:150
    1. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jun;24(6):1366-75
    1. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Jun;35(6):928-35
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Mar;35(3):425-33
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jul;40(1):239-47
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Aug;42(2):515-25
    1. Clin Sports Med. 2008 Jul;27(3):405-24, vii-ix
    1. Eur Radiol. 2002 Dec;12(12):2982-7
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Sep;28(3):543-58
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Mar;25(3):644-52
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 May;87(1):90-2
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Jan;96(1):24-31
    1. BMC Med Imaging. 2010 Aug 11;10:18
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Apr;21(4):914-27
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul;(304):78-83
    1. Int J Sports Med. 2002 Apr;23(3):196-201
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Jun;100(3):267-74
    1. Knee. 2001 Oct;8(3):229-34
    1. Clin Physiol. 1985 Apr;5(2):145-54
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):108-13
    1. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Jan;86(3):203-8
    1. Radiology. 2003 Aug;228(2):303-8
    1. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Nov;22(11):1537-46

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera