Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors

A Nakeeb, H A Pitt, T A Sohn, J Coleman, R A Abrams, S Piantadosi, R H Hruban, K D Lillemoe, C J Yeo, J L Cameron, A Nakeeb, H A Pitt, T A Sohn, J Coleman, R A Abrams, S Piantadosi, R H Hruban, K D Lillemoe, C J Yeo, J L Cameron

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this article is to introduce a simple method for classifying cholangiocarcinomas and to apply this system to analyze a large number of patients from a single institution.

Summary background data: For the past 2 decades, most western reports on cholangiocarcinoma have separated intrahepatic from extrahepatic tumors and have subclassified this latter group into proximal, middle, and distal subgroups. However, "middle" lesions are uncommon and are managed most often either with hilar resection or with pancreatoduodenectomy. The spectrum of cholangiocarcinoma, therefore, is best classified into three broad groups: 1) intrahepatic, 2) perihilar, and 3) distal tumors. These categories correlate with anatomic distribution and imply preferred treatment.

Methods: The records of all patients with histologically confirmed cholangiocarcinoma who underwent surgical exploration at The Johns Hopkins Hospital over a 23-year period were reviewed.

Results: Of 294 patients with cholangiocarcinoma, 18 (6%) had intrahepatic, 196 (67%) had perihilar, and 80 (27%) had distal tumors. Age, gender, race, and associated diseases were similar among the three groups. Patients with intrahepatic tumors, by definition, were less likely (p < 0.01) to be jaundiced and more likely (p < 0.05) to present with abdominal pain. The resectability rate increased with a more distal location (50% vs. 56% vs. 91%), and resection improved survival at each site. Five-year survival rates for resected intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors were 44%, 11%, and 28%, and median survival rates were 26, 19, and 22 months, respectively. Postoperative radiation therapy did not improve survival. In a multivariate analysis resection (p < 0.001. hazard ratio 2.80), negative microscopic margins (p < 0.01, hazard ratio 1.79), preoperative serum albumin (p < 0.04, hazard ratio 0.82), and postoperative sepsis (p < 0.001, hard ratio 0.27) were the best predictors of outcome.

Conclusions: Cholangiocarcinoma is best classified into three broad categories. Resection remains the primary treatment, whereas postoperative adjuvant radiation has no influence on survival. Therefore, new agents or strategies to deliver adjuvant therapy are needed to improve survival.

References

    1. World J Surg. 1995 Jan-Feb;19(1):83-8
    1. Arch Surg. 1995 Mar;130(3):270-6
    1. Ann Surg. 1995 Jun;221(6):788-97; discussion 797-8
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975 Feb;140(2):170-8
    1. Ann Surg. 1981 Oct;194(4):447-57
    1. Surgery. 1985 Oct;98(4):752-9
    1. Cancer. 1989 Dec 1;64(11):2226-32
    1. Arch Surg. 1989 Nov;124(11):1275-9
    1. Am J Surg. 1990 Jan;159(1):91-7; discussion 97-8
    1. Ann Surg. 1990 May;211(5):614-20; discussion 620-1
    1. Surgery. 1990 Sep;108(3):495-501
    1. Surgery. 1990 Sep;108(3):572-80
    1. Ann Surg. 1991 Mar;213(3):236-41
    1. Br J Surg. 1991 Jun;78(6):727-31
    1. Am J Clin Oncol. 1991 Oct;14(5):433-7
    1. Surgery. 1992 Jun;111(6):617-22
    1. HPB Surg. 1992;5(2):95-101; discussion 101-2
    1. Ann Surg. 1993 Jan;217(1):20-7
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Mar;176(3):239-45
    1. Surgery. 1993 Mar;113(3):270-8
    1. Am J Surg. 1993 May;165(5):554-7
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Jul;11(7):1286-93
    1. Arch Surg. 1993 Aug;128(8):871-7; discussion 877-9
    1. Br J Surg. 1993 Nov;80(11):1434-9
    1. Ann Surg. 1994 Mar;219(3):267-74
    1. J Surg Oncol. 1994 Apr;55(4):239-45
    1. Surgery. 1994 Apr;115(4):445-51
    1. Curr Probl Surg. 1995 Jan;32(1):1-90
    1. J Surg Oncol. 1995 May;59(1):40-4

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera