Comparison of 3 Paclitaxel-Based Chemoradiotherapy Regimens for Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Dashan Ai, Jinjun Ye, Shihong Wei, Yunhai Li, Hui Luo, Jianzhong Cao, Zhengfei Zhu, Weixin Zhao, Qin Lin, Huanjun Yang, Xiangpeng Zheng, Jialiang Zhou, Guang Huang, Ling Li, Jiancheng Li, Zhi Zhang, Guoren Zhou, Dayong Gu, Mingyu Du, Miao Mo, HuiXun Jia, Zhen Zhang, Kuaile Zhao, Dashan Ai, Jinjun Ye, Shihong Wei, Yunhai Li, Hui Luo, Jianzhong Cao, Zhengfei Zhu, Weixin Zhao, Qin Lin, Huanjun Yang, Xiangpeng Zheng, Jialiang Zhou, Guang Huang, Ling Li, Jiancheng Li, Zhi Zhang, Guoren Zhou, Dayong Gu, Mingyu Du, Miao Mo, HuiXun Jia, Zhen Zhang, Kuaile Zhao

Abstract

Importance: Multiple paclitaxel-based regimens are widely used in chemoradiation therapy against esophageal cancer, including regimens combining paclitaxel with fluorouracil, cisplatin, and carboplatin. However, which among these 3 regimens provides the best prognosis with minimum adverse events is still unknown.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse events of fluorouracil, cisplatin, and carboplatin in definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial of patients with ESCC was conducted in 11 treatment centers in China. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years and had histologically confirmed ESCC stages IIa to IVa with no prior treatment, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, and adequate organ functions. The study was conducted between July 2015 and February 2018, and the cutoff date for data analysis was August 31, 2020.

Interventions: Patients with locally advanced ESCC were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to groups combining paclitaxel treatment with fluorouracil, cisplatin, or carboplatin. Patients in the cisplatin group were treated with 2 cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by 2 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with monthly paclitaxel plus cisplatin. For the fluorouracil group, patients were administered 6 cycles of weekly paclitaxel plus fluorouracil in concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by 2 cycles of monthly paclitaxel plus fluorouracil in consolidation chemotherapy. Patients in the carboplatin group were treated with 6 cycles of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin in concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by 2 cycles of monthly paclitaxel plus carboplatin in consolidation chemotherapy. All patients received radiotherapy of 61.2 Gy delivered in 34 fractions.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The secondary end points were progression-free survival and adverse events.

Results: Overall, 321 patients (median [IQR] age, 64 years [59-69 years]; 248 [77.3%] men) with ESCC from 11 centers were randomized into fluorouracil, cisplatin, or carboplatin groups between July 2015 and February 2018. Over a median (IQR) follow-up time of surviving patients of 46.0 months (36.6-53.0 months), the 3-year OS rates were 57.2% in the fluorouracil group, 60.1% in the cisplatin group, and 56.5% in the carboplatin group, respectively (fluorouracil vs cisplatin: HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.71-1.60; P = .77; fluorouracil vs carboplatin: HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63-1.40; P = .77). The cisplatin group had significantly higher incidences of acute grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (69 events [60.8%] vs 19 [17.8%] for fluorouracil and 37 [34.6%] carboplatin; P < .001), thrombocytopenia (14 events [13.1%] vs 4 [3.7%] for fluorouracil and 5 [4.7%] for carboplatin; P = .01), anemia (50 events above grade 2 [46.7%] vs 25 [23.4%] for fluorouracil and 37 [34.6%] for carboplatin; P = .35), fatigue (11 events [10.3%] vs 2 [1.9%] for fluorouracil and 1 [0.9%] carboplatin; P = .007), and vomiting (17 events above grade 2 [15.9%] vs 3 [2.8%] for fluorouracil and 5 [4.7%] for carboplatin; P < .001) than the other 2 groups.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, paclitaxel plus fluorouracil did not show OS superiority over paclitaxel plus cisplatin or paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimens in definitive chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced ESCC. Higher rates of hematologic and gastrointestinal toxic effects were reported in the cisplatin group compared with those in the fluorouracil or carboplatin groups.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02459457.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Trial Profile
Figure 1.. Trial Profile
ECOG indicates Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Three hundred forty-six patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were assessed for eligibility at registration in 11 centers in China. Three hundred twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to the paclitaxel plus fluorouracil group, the paclitaxel plus cisplatin group, or the paclitaxel plus carboplatin group as an intention-to-treat population.
Figure 2.. Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival…
Figure 2.. Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Enrolled Patients

References

    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. . Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115-132. doi:10.3322/caac.21338
    1. Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A, et al. ; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group . Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). JAMA. 1999;281(17):1623-1627. doi:10.1001/jama.281.17.1623
    1. Chen Y, Ye J, Zhu Z, et al. . Comparing paclitaxel plus fluorouracil versus cisplatin plus fluorouracil in chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase III clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(20):1695-1703. doi:10.1200/JCO.18.02122
    1. Rogers JE, Ajani JA. Taxane- versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy with radiation therapy is a better platform to refine esophageal cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(30):2805-2806. doi:10.1200/JCO.19.01247
    1. Ajani JA, Winter K, Komaki R, et al. . Phase II randomized trial of two nonoperative regimens of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation in patients with localized carcinoma of the esophagus: RTOG 0113. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(28):4551-4556. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6918
    1. Adelstein DJ, Rice TW, Rybicki LA, et al. . Does paclitaxel improve the chemoradiotherapy of locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer? a nonrandomized comparison with fluorouracil-based therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(10):2032-2039. doi:10.1200/JCO.2000.18.10.2032
    1. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. ; CROSS Group . Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(22):2074-2084. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1112088
    1. Ai D, Chen Y, Liu Q, et al. . Comparison of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin (TP), carboplatin (TC) or fluorouracil (TF) concurrent with radiotherapy for patients with local advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a three-arm phase III randomized trial (ESO-Shanghai 2). BMJ Open. 2018;8(10):e020785. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020785
    1. Haj Mohammad N, Hulshof MC, Bergman JJ, et al. . Acute toxicity of definitive chemoradiation in patients with inoperable or irresectable esophageal carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:56. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-56
    1. Honing J, Smit JK, Muijs CT, et al. . A comparison of carboplatin and paclitaxel with cisplatinum and 5-fluorouracil in definitive chemoradiation in esophageal cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(3):638-643. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt589
    1. Wu SX, Wang LH, Luo HL, et al. . Randomised phase III trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with extended nodal irradiation and erlotinib in patients with inoperable oesophageal squamous cell cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2018;93:99-107. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2018.01.085
    1. Ardizzoni A, Boni L, Tiseo M, et al. ; CISCA (CISplatin versus CArboplatin) Meta-analysis Group . Cisplatin- versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(11):847-857. doi:10.1093/jnci/djk196

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera