Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ravindu P Gunatilake, Geeta K Swamy, Leo R Brancazio, Michael P Smrtka, Jennifer L Thompson, Jennifer B Gilner, Beverly A Gray, Robert Phillips Heine, Ravindu P Gunatilake, Geeta K Swamy, Leo R Brancazio, Michael P Smrtka, Jennifer L Thompson, Jennifer B Gilner, Beverly A Gray, Robert Phillips Heine

Abstract

Background Postcesarean wound morbidity is a costly complication of cesarean delivery for which preventative strategies remain understudied. Objective We compared surgical site occurrences (SSOs) in cesarean patients receiving closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) or standard-of-care (SOC) dressing. Study Design A single-center randomized controlled trial compared ciNPT (5-7 days) to SOC dressing (1-2 days) in obese women (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35), undergoing cesarean delivery between 2012 and 2014. Participants were randomized 1:1 and monitored 42 ± 10 days postoperatively. The primary outcome SSOs included unanticipated local inflammation, wound infection, seroma, hematoma, dehiscence, and need for surgical or antibiotic intervention. Results Of the 92 randomized patients, 82 completed the study. ciNPT and SOC groups had similar baseline characteristics. Mean BMI was 46.5 ± 6.5 and no treatment-related serious adverse events. Compared with SOC, the ciNPT group had fewer SSOs (7/43 [16.3%] vs. 2/39 [5.1%], respectively; p = 0.16); significantly fewer participants with less incisional pain both at rest (39/46 [84.8%] vs. 20/46 [43.5%]; p < 0.001) and with incisional pressure (42/46 [91.3%] vs. 25/46 [54.3%]; p < 0.001); and a 30% decrease in total opioid use (79.1 vs. 55.9 mg morphine equivalents, p = 0.036). Conclusion A trend in SSO reduction and a statistically significant reduction in postoperative pain and narcotic use was observed in women using ciNPT.

Keywords: cesarean; negative pressure wound therapy; obesity; wound infection.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure To the author's knowledge, no conflict of interest, either financial or other, exists.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT study population diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Wound complication rates. The percentage of participants in the ciNPT and SOC groups who had any SSO and those who developed a SSI calculated from the per-protocol population (n = 82). SSO, surgical site occurrence; SSI, surgical site infection; ciNPT, closed-incision negative-pressure therapy; SOC, standard-of-care dressing.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Participant-perceived pain scores at rest. Percentage of participants who reported pain at rest with a value of > 2 (any pain) using the Wong–Baker Faces Scale, calculated from the intention-to-treat population (n = 92). ciNPT, closed-incision negative-pressure therapy; SOC, standard-of-care dressing.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Participant-perceived pain scores with pressure. Percentage of participants who reported pain with pressure applied to a value of > 2 (any pain) using the Wong–Baker Faces Scale, calculated from the intention-to-treat population (n = 92). ciNPT, closed-incision negative-pressure therapy; SOC, standard-of-care dressing.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Total analgesic use for hospital stay. Cumulative total inpatient use of acetaminophen, NSAID, and narcotic opioid medications expressed as milligrams, maximum daily use equivalents, and parenteral morphine mg equivalents, respectively. ciNPT, closed-incision negative-pressure therapy; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory; SOC, standard-of-care dressing.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Births—Method of deliveryAvailable at:. Accessed October 07, 2015
    1. Edwards J R, Peterson K D, Mu Y et al.National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(10):783–805.
    1. Perlow J H, Morgan M A, Montgomery D, Towers C V, Porto M.Perinatal outcome in pregnancy complicated by massive obesity Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992167(4 Pt 1):958–962.
    1. Alanis M C, Villers M S, Law T L, Steadman E M, Robinson C J. Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(03):2710–2.71E9.
    1. Olsen M A, Butler A M, Willers D M, Devkota P, Gross G A, Fraser V J.Risk factors for surgical site infection after low transverse cesarean section Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20082906477–484., discussion 485–486
    1. Tuuli M G, Rampersad R M, Carbone J F, Stamilio D, Macones G A, Odibo A O. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(03):682–690.
    1. Mackeen A D, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J et al.Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(06):1169–1175.
    1. Rousseau J A, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(03):2650–2.65E6.
    1. Basha S L, Rochon M L, Quiñones J N, Coassolo K M, Rust O A, Smulian J C. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(03):2850–2.85E10.
    1. Figueroa D, Jauk V C, Szychowski J M et al.Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(01):33–38.
    1. Stannard J P, Volgas D A, McGwin G, III et al.Incisional negative pressure wound therapy after high-risk lower extremity fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(01):37–42.
    1. Grauhan O, Navasardyan A, Hofmann M, Müller P, Stein J, Hetzer R. Prevention of poststernotomy wound infections in obese patients by negative pressure wound therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(05):1387–1392.
    1. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz K F et al.CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2012;10(01):28–55.
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research Quality.HCUPnet. Healthcare Cost and Utilization ProjectAvailable at:. Accessed October 7, 2015
    1. Gibbs C, Orth T, Gerkovich M, Heitmann E, Parrish M, Lu G. Traditional dressing compared with an external negative pressure system in preventing wound complications. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:145S.
    1. Swift S H, Zimmerman M B, Hardy-Fairbanks A J.Effect of single-use negative pressure wound therapy on postcesarean infections and wound complications for high-risk patients J Reprod Med 201560(5-6):211–218.
    1. Mark K S, Alger L, Terplan M. Incisional negative pressure therapy to prevent wound complications following cesarean section in morbidly obese women: a pilot study. Surg Innov. 2014;21(04):345–349.
    1. Gadsden J, Hart S, Santos A -cesarean delivery analgesia Anesth Analg 2005101(5, Suppl):S62–S69.
    1. Woods A B, Crist B, Kowalewski S, Carroll J, Warren J, Robertson J. A cross-sectional analysis of the effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient controlled analgesia on postcesarean pain and breastfeeding. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012;41(03):339–346.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera