Randomized clinical trial of streaming dichoptic movies versus patching for treatment of amblyopia in children aged 3 to 7 years

Reed M Jost, Lindsey A Hudgins, Lori M Dao, David R Stager Jr, Becky Luu, Cynthia L Beauchamp, Jeffrey S Hunter, Prashanthi Giridhar, Yi-Zhong Wang, Eileen E Birch, Reed M Jost, Lindsey A Hudgins, Lori M Dao, David R Stager Jr, Becky Luu, Cynthia L Beauchamp, Jeffrey S Hunter, Prashanthi Giridhar, Yi-Zhong Wang, Eileen E Birch

Abstract

Contrast-rebalanced dichoptic movies have been shown to be an effective binocular treatment for amblyopia in the laboratory. Yet, at-home therapy is a more practical approach. In a randomized clinical trial, we compared dichoptic movies, streamed at-home on a handheld 3D-enabled game console, versus patching as amblyopia treatment. Sixty-five amblyopic children (3-7 years; 20/32-125) were randomly assigned to one of two parallel arms, binocular treatment (3 movies/week) or patching (14 h/week). The primary outcome, change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the 2-week visit was completed by 28 and 30, respectively. After the primary outcome, both groups of children had the option to complete up to 6 weeks of binocular treatment. At the 2-week primary outcome visit, BCVA had improved in the movie (0.07 ± 0.02 logMAR; p < .001) and patching (0.06 ± 0.01 logMAR; p < 0.001) groups. There was no significant difference between groups (CI95%: - 0.02 to 0.04; p = .48). Visual acuity improved in both groups with binocular treatment up to 6 weeks (0.15 and 0.18 logMAR improvement, respectively). This novel, at-home, binocular movie treatment improved amblyopic eye BCVA after 2 weeks (similar to patching), with additional improvement up to 6 weeks. Repeated binocular visual experience with contrast-rebalanced binocular movies provides an additional treatment option for amblyopia.Clincaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03825107 (31/01/2019).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Amblyopic eye visual acuity improvement relative to baseline for 60 children randomized to watch contrast rebalanced dichoptic movies or patching for 2 weeks. Also shown are visual acuity differences from baseline extracted from medical records at 1, 3, and 6 months prior to the baseline/randomization visit and further visual acuity improvement with continued viewing of dichoptic movies by children in the dichoptic movie group at 4 and 6 weeks and by children who crossed over to watch dichoptic movies after their initial two weeks of patching treatment and participated through 8 weeks.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Visual acuity improvement in the movie and patching groups in children who had a clinical history of prior visual acuity improvement when treated with glasses and patching and children who had no visual acuity improvement when treated with glasses and patching. Numbers to the right of each data point indicate the n at each timepoint for each subgroup. Note that 3 children in the movie group and 1 child in the patching group were too young to provide visual acuity data on two visits prior to the enrollment visit and, as a result, could not be categorized as no response or response. These children were excluded from this analysis.

References

    1. Birch, E. E. et al. Binocular amblyopia treatment with contrast-rebalanced movies. J AAPOS23, 160 e161–160 e165. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2019.02.007 (2019).
    1. Li SL, et al. Dichoptic movie viewing treats childhood amblyopia. J. AAPOS. 2015;19:401–405. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.08.003.
    1. Xiao, S. et al. Digital therapeutic improves visual acuity and encourages high adherence in amblyopic children in open-label pilot study. J. AAPOS25, 87 e81–87 e86. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.11.022 (2021).
    1. Xiao S, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a dichoptic digital therapeutic for amblyopia. Ophthalmology. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.09.001.
    1. Holmes JM, et al. Effect of age on response to amblyopia treatment in children. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2011;129:1451–1457. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.179.
    1. Lasker/IRRF Initiative for Innovation in Vision Science Amblyopia: Challenges and opportunities. Vis. Neurosci. 2018;35:E010. doi: 10.1017/S0952523817000177.
    1. Ophthalmology, A. A. o. Pediatric Eye Evaluations PPP 2017. (2017).
    1. Kelly KR, et al. Binocular iPad game vs patching for treatment of amblyopia in children: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134:1402–1408. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4224.
    1. Jost, R. M. et al. A randomized clinical trial of contrast increment protocols for binocular amblyopia treatment. J. AAPOS24, 282 e281–282 e287. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.06.009 (2020).
    1. Birch EE, et al. Binocular iPad treatment for amblyopia in preschool children. J. AAPOS. 2015;19:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.09.009.
    1. Moke PS, et al. Computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2001;132:903–909. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01256-9.
    1. Holmes JM, et al. The amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1345–1353. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.9.1345.
    1. Drover JR, et al. Normative pediatric visual acuity using single surrounded HOTV optotypes on the Electronic Visual Acuity Tester following the Amblyopia Treatment Study protocol. J. AAPOS. 2008;12:145–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.08.014.
    1. Beck R, et al. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2003;135:194–205. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01825-1.
    1. Cotter S, et al. Reliability of the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol in children 7 to <13 years old. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2003;136:655–661. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00388-X.
    1. Morale SE, Cheng-Patel CS, Jost RM, Donohoe N, Birch EE. Normative pediatric visual acuity using electronic early treatment for diabetic retinopathy protocol. J. AAPOS. 2021;25:172–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.01.003.
    1. Birch E, et al. Randot preschool stereoacuity test: Normative data and validity. J. AAPOS. 2008;12:23–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.06.003.
    1. Rosenbaum, A. L. & Santiago, A. P. Clinical strabismus management: Principles and surgical techniques. (Saunders, 1999).
    1. Birch EE, et al. Assessing suppression in amblyopic children with a dichoptic eye chart. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57:5649–5654. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19986.
    1. Webber AL, Wood JM, Thompson B, Birch EE. From suppression to stereoacuity: A composite binocular function score for clinical research. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 2019;39:53–62. doi: 10.1111/opo.12599.
    1. Dhand, N. K. & Khatkar, M. S. Statulator: An online statistical calculator. Sample size calculator for comparing two independent means., 2014).
    1. Yao J, Moon HW, Qu X. Binocular game versus part-time patching for treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in Chinese children: A randomised clinical trial. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2020;104:369–375. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313815.
    1. Jost RM, et al. A randomized clinical trial of contrast increment protocols for binocular amblyopia treatment. J. AAPOS. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.06.009.
    1. Kelly KR, et al. Improved binocular outcomes following binocular treatment for childhood amblyopia. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59:1221–1228. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-23235.
    1. Webber AL, Wood JM, Thompson B. Fine motor skills of children with amblyopia improve following binocular treatment. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57:4713–4720. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19797.
    1. Holmes, J. M. et al. in American Academy of Ophthalmology (Virtual, 2020).
    1. Holmes JM, et al. Effect of a binocular iPad game vs part-time patching in children aged 5 to 12 years with amblyopia: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134:1391–1400. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4262.
    1. Birch EE, Kelly KR, Wang J. Recent advances in screening and treatment for amblyopia. Ophthalmol. Ther. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00394-7.
    1. van Onzenoort H, Menger FE, Neef C, Verberk W. Participation in a clinical trial enhances adherence and persistence to treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Hypertension. 2011;58:573–578. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.171074.
    1. Wang, J. et al. Improved monitoring of adherence with patching treatment using a microsensor and Eye Patch Assistant. J. AAPOS24, 96 e91–96 e97. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.01.006 (2020).
    1. Birch EE, et al. Baseline and clinical factors associated with response to amblyopia treatment in a randomized clinical trial. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2020;97:316–323. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001514.
    1. Wang J, et al. A pilot randomized clinical trial of intermittent occlusion therapy liquid crystal glasses versus traditional patching for treatment of moderate unilateral amblyopia. J. AAPOS. 2016;20:326–331. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2016.05.014.
    1. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group Writing, C. et al. A randomized trial comparing Bangerter filters and patching for the treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology117, 998–1004 e1006. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.10.014 (2010).
    1. Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Stephens DA, Fielder AR. Treatment dose-response in amblyopia therapy: the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS) Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45:3048–3054. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0250.
    1. Lueder GT, Garibaldi D. Comparison of visual acuity measured with allen figures and snellen letters using the B-VAT II monitor. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1758–1761. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30030-X.
    1. Birch, E. E., Strauber, S. F., Beck, R. W., Holmes, J. M. & Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator, G. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and the electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in amblyopic children aged 5 to 11 years. J. AAPOS13, 75–78. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.07.007 (2009).
    1. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch. Ophthalmol.120, 268–278 (2002).
    1. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group A randomized trial of patching regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2003;121:603–611. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.5.603.
    1. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group A randomized trial of prescribed patching regimens for treatment of severe amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:2075–2087. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.08.001.
    1. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group A randomized trial of atropine regimens for the treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2076–2085. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.04.032.
    1. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group A randomized trial of near versus distance activities while patching for amblyopia in children aged 3 to less than 7 years. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:2071–2078. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.06.031.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera