Effects of wearing functional foot orthotic on pelvic angle among college students in their 20s with flatfoot

KwangYong Park, KwangYong Park

Abstract

[Purpose] This study examined the impact of wearing a functional foot orthotic on the pelvic angle of young adults who have flatfoot. [Subjects and Methods] A total of 15 college students diagnosed with flatfoot were included in the study. Changes in the pelvic angle in the stance period during walking before and after orthotic use were measured using a VICON Motion System (VICON, Hansung, Korea). The data were analyzed using SPSS 12.0 for Windows. [Results] In the experimental group, the pelvic angle during the mid-stance and mid-swing periods of the gait cycle significantly decreased on the left and right sides after wearing the orthotic, compared to the measurements taken before orthotic usage. The pelvic angle change on the left and right sides also decreased after wearing the orthotic, though this difference was not significant. [Conclusion] The pelvic angle of college students with flatfoot decreased after they wore orthotics. This implies that wearing orthotic shoes can greatly benefit individuals during normal walking by promoting passive changes that decrease the pelvic angle.

Keywords: Flat-foot; Gait cycle; VICON.

References

    1. Perry J: Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. SLACK Inc., 2010.
    1. Houglum PA, Bertoti DB: Brunnstrom’ clinical kinesiology, 6th ed. F.A. Davis, 2012.
    1. Neumann DA: Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system, 2nd ed. Elsevier Korea LLC, 2011.
    1. Eng JJ, Pierrynowski MR: Evaluation of soft foot orthotics in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Phys Ther, 1993, 73: 62–68, discussion 68–70.
    1. Pratt DJ: A critical review of the literature on foot orthoses. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 2000, 90: 339–341.
    1. Song JH: The Kinematic comparative study about effects of foot orthotics. Korean J Sport Sci, 2008, 19: 11–21.
    1. Hannaford DR: Soft orthoses for athletes. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 1986, 76: 566–569.
    1. Nigg BM, Nurse MA, Stefanyshyn DJ: Shoe inserts and orthotics for sport and physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1999, 31: S421–S428.
    1. Gross ML, Napoli RC: Treatment of lower extremity injuries with orthotics shoe insert. Sprots Med, 1993, 15: 99–70.
    1. Takata Y, Matsuoka S, Okumura N, et al. : Standing balance on the ground -the influence of flatfeet and insoles. J Phys Ther Sci, 2013, 25: 1519–1521.
    1. Lee Y, Her JG, Choi Y, et al. : Effects of ankle-foot orthosis on lower limb muscle activities and static balance of stroke patients author’s names. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26: 179–182.
    1. Han JM, Kim HA, Koo JP, et al. : Effects respiratory muscle activity in stroke patients after feedback breathing exercise. IAPTR, 2013, 4: 552–556.
    1. Franco AH: Pes cavus and pes planus. Analyses and treatment. Phys Ther, 1987, 67: 688–694.
    1. Wu KK: Foot orthoses, principles and clinical applications. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1990, p 97.
    1. Magee DJ: Orthopedic physical assessment, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1997.
    1. Hertel J, Sloss BR, Earl JE: Effect of foot orthotics on quadriceps and gluteus medius electromyographic activity during selected exercises. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2005, 86: 26–30.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera