Components of clean delivery kits and newborn mortality in the Zambia Chlorhexidine Application Trial (ZamCAT): An observational study

Jason H Park, Davidson H Hamer, Reuben Mbewe, Nancy A Scott, Julie M Herlihy, Kojo Yeboah-Antwi, Katherine E A Semrau, Jason H Park, Davidson H Hamer, Reuben Mbewe, Nancy A Scott, Julie M Herlihy, Kojo Yeboah-Antwi, Katherine E A Semrau

Abstract

Background: Neonatal infection, a leading cause of neonatal death in low- and middle-income countries, is often caused by pathogens acquired during childbirth. Clean delivery kits (CDKs) have shown efficacy in reducing infection-related perinatal and neonatal mortality. However, there remain gaps in our current knowledge, including the effect of individual components, the timeline of protection, and the benefit of CDKs in home and facility deliveries.

Methods and findings: A post hoc secondary analysis was performed using nonrandomized data from the Zambia Chlorhexidine Application Trial (ZamCAT), a community-based, cluster-randomized controlled trial of chlorhexidine umbilical cord care in Southern Province of Zambia from February 2011 to January 2013. CDKs, containing soap, gloves, cord clamps, plastic sheet, razor blade, matches, and candle, were provided to all pregnant women. Field monitors made a home-based visit to each participant 4 days postpartum, during which CDK use and newborn outcomes were ascertained. Logistic regression was used to study the association between different CDK components and neonatal mortality rate (NMR). Of 38,579 deliveries recorded during the study, 36,996 newborns were analyzed after excluding stillbirths and those with missing information. Gloves, cord clamps, and plastic sheets were the most frequently used CDK item combination in both home and facility deliveries. Each of the 7 CDK components was associated with lower NMR in users versus nonusers. Adjusted logistic regression showed that use of gloves (odds ratio [OR] 0.33, 95% CI 0.24-0.46), cord clamp (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38-0.68), plastic sheet (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34-0.63), and razor blade (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.89) were associated with lower risk of newborn mortality. Use of gloves and cord clamp were associated with reduced risk of immediate newborn death (<24 hours). Reduction in risk of early newborn death (1-6 days) was associated with use of gloves, cord clamps, plastic sheets, and razor blades. In examining perinatal mortality (stillbirth plus neonatal death in the first 7 days of life), similar patterns were observed. There was no significant reduction in risk of late newborn mortality (7-28 days) with CDK use. Study limitations included potential recall bias of CDK use and inability to establish causality, as this was a secondary observational study.

Conclusions: CDK use was associated with reductions in early newborn mortality at both home and facility deliveries, especially when certain kit components were used. While causality could not be established in this nonrandomized secondary analysis, given these beneficial associations, scaling up the use of CDKs in rural areas of sub-Saharan Africa may improve neonatal outcomes.

Trial registration: Name of trial: Zambia Chlorhexidine Application Trial (ZamCAT) Name of registry: Clinicaltrials.gov Trial number: NCT01241318.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Participant flow chart.
Fig 1. Participant flow chart.
CDK, clean delivery kit.

References

    1. You D, Wardlaw T, Newby H, Anthony D, Rogers K. Renewing the promise of survival for children. Lancet. 2013;382(9897):1002–04. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61895-4
    1. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee ACC, Waiswa P, et al.. Every newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):189–205. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7
    1. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Perin J, Rudan I, Lawn JE, et al.. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000–13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet. 2015;385(9966):430–40. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61698-6
    1. Ganatra HA, Stoll BJ, Zaidi AK. International perspective on early-onset neonatal sepsis. Clin Perinatol. 2010;37(2):501–23. 10.1016/j.clp.2010.02.004
    1. Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement (AMANHI) mortality study group. Population-based rates, timing, and causes of maternal deaths, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country prospective cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(12):e1297–308. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30385-1
    1. Technical Working Group on Essential Newborn Care. Essential newborn care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1994. [cited 2021 Apr 26]. Available from: .
    1. Aleman A, Tomasso G, Cafferata ML, Colomar M, Betran AP. Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):175. 10.1186/s12978-017-0436-9
    1. Garner P, Lai D, Baea M, Edwards K, Heywood P. Avoiding neonatal death: an intervention study of umbilical cord care. J Trop Pediatr. 1994;40(1):24–8. 10.1093/tropej/40.1.24
    1. Raza SA, Avan BI. Disposable clean delivery kits and prevention of neonatal tetanus in the presence of skilled birth attendants. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;120(2):148–51. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.07.030
    1. Balsara ZP, Hussein MH, Winch PJ, Gipson R, Santosham M, Darmstadt GL. Impact of clean delivery kit use on clean delivery practices in Beni Suef governorate, Egypt. J Perinatol. 2009;29(10):673–9. 10.1038/jp.2009.80
    1. Jokhio AH, Winter HR, Cheng KK. An intervention involving traditional birth attendants and perinatal and maternal mortality in Pakistan. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(20):2091–9. 10.1056/NEJMsa042830
    1. Seward N, Osrin D, Li L, Costello A, Pulkki-Brannstrom AM, Houweling TAJ, et al.. Association between clean delivery kit use, clean delivery practices, and neonatal survival: pooled analysis of data from three sites in South Asia. PLoS Med. 2012;9(2):e1001180. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001180
    1. Darmstadt GL, Hassan M, Balsara ZP, Winch PJ, Gipson R, Santosham M. Impact of clean delivery-kit use on newborn umbilical cord and maternal puerperal infections in Egypt. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27(6):746–54. 10.3329/jhpn.v27i6.4326
    1. Semrau KEA, Herlihy J, Grogan C, Musokotwane K, Yeboah-Antwi K, Mbewe R, et al.. Effectiveness of 4% chlorhexidine umbilical cord care on neonatal mortality in Southern Province, Zambia (ZamCAT): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(11):e827–36. 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30215-7
    1. Hamer DH, Herlihy JM, Musokotwane K, Banda B, Mpamba C, Mwangelwa B, et al.. Engagement of the community, traditional leaders, and public health system in the design and implementation of a large community-based, cluster-randomized trial of umbilical cord care in Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92(3):666–72. 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0218
    1. Central Statistical Office, Ministry of Health, Tropical Diseases Research Centre, University of Zambia. Zambia demographic and health survey 2007. Calverton (MD): Macro International; 2009.
    1. World Health Organization. Managing possible serious bacterial infection in young infants when referral is not feasible. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. [cited 2021 Apr 27]. Available from: .
    1. World Health Organization. Preterm birth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. [cited 2021 Apr 27]. Available from: .
    1. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (ICD). ICD-11. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. [cited 2021 Apr 27]. Available from: .
    1. Oza S, Lawn JE, Hogan DR, Mathers C, Cousens SN. Neonatal cause-of-death estimates for the early and late neonatal periods for 194 countries: 2000–2013. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93(1):19–28. 10.2471/BLT.14.139790
    1. Republic of Zambia Ministry of Health. Reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health and nutrition communication and advocacy strategy 2018–2021. Lusaka: Republic of Zambia Ministry of Health; 2019. [cited 2020 Jun 16]. Available from: .
    1. Owens L, Semrau K, Mbewe R, Musokotwane K, Grogan C, Maine D, et al.. The state of routine and emergency obstetric and neonatal care in Southern Province, Zambia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;128(1):53–7. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.07.028
    1. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, Lawn JE, Salam RA, Paul VK, et al.. Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? Lancet. 2014;384(9940):347–70. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60792-3
    1. Winani S, Wood S, Coffey P, Chirwa T, Mosha F, Changalucha J. Use of a clean delivery kit and factors associated with cord infection and puerperal sepsis in Mwanza, Tanzania. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007;52(1):37–43. 10.1016/j.jmwh.2006.09.004
    1. Hundley VA, Avan BI, Braunholtz D, Graham WJ. Are birth kits a good idea? A systematic review of the evidence. Midwifery. 2012;28(2):204–15. 10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.004
    1. Pell LG, Turab A, Bassani DG, Shi J, Soofi S, Hussain M, et al.. Effect of an integrated neonatal care kit on neonatal health outcomes: a cluster randomised controlled trial in rural Pakistan. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(3):e001393. 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001393

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera