The influence of neuroticism and psychological symptoms on the assessment of images in three-dimensional emotion space

Steffen Walter, Henrik Kessler, Sascha Gruss, Lucia Jerg-Bretzke, Andreas Scheck, Jochen Ströbel, Holger Hoffmann, Harald C Traue, Steffen Walter, Henrik Kessler, Sascha Gruss, Lucia Jerg-Bretzke, Andreas Scheck, Jochen Ströbel, Holger Hoffmann, Harald C Traue

Abstract

Objective: The present study investigated the influence of neuroticism (NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)) and psychological symptoms (Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)) on pleasure, arousal, and dominance (PAD) ratings of the International Affective Picture System (IAPS).

Methods: The subjects (N=131) were presented with images from the IAPS (30 images) and new images (30 images). The influence of neuroticism and BSI (median split: high vs. low) on the assessment of pleasure, arousal and dominance of the images was examined. Correlations of pleasure, arousal and dominance were presented in a 3-D video animation.

Results: Subjects with high scores (compared to subjects with low scores by median split) of neuroticism and psychological symptoms of the BSI rated the presented emotional images more negative in the valence dimension (pleasure), higher in arousal and less dominant.

Conclusion: Neuroticism and psychological symptoms influence the subjective emotional evaluation of emotional images. Therefore the location in the three-dimensional emotion space depends on individual differences. Such differences must be kept in mind, if correlations between emotion ratings and other variables like psychobiological measures are analyzed.

Keywords: emotion space; emotion stimuli; personality; psychological symptoms.

Figures

Table 1. Influence of neuroticism (high vs.…
Table 1. Influence of neuroticism (high vs. low, median split = 2.67) on pleasure (V), arousal- (A), dominance (D) ratings by categories (T test, one-sided, scale: 1–9, N=131, M = means and SD = standard deviation)
Table 2. Influence of the Brief Symptom…
Table 2. Influence of the Brief Symptom Inventory (high vs. low) on pleasure (V), arousal (A), dominance (D) ratings by categories (T test, one-sided, scale: 1–9, N=131, M = mean and SD = standard deviation)
Table 3. Influence of the Brief Symptom…
Table 3. Influence of the Brief Symptom Inventory (detailed, high vs. low) on pleasure (V), arousal (A), dominance (D) ratings by categories (T test, one-sided, scale: 1–9, N=131, M = mean and SD = standard deviation)
Table 4. Ratings of new images (30…
Table 4. Ratings of new images (30 images; N=131) for pleasure, arousal, dominance

References

    1. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective Ractings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report no. A-6. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida; 2005. (Technical Report; no. A-6).
    1. Blake TM, Varnhagen CK, Parent MB. Emotionally arousing pictures increase blood glucose levels and enhance recall. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2001;75(3):262–273. doi: 10.1006/nlme.2000.3973. Available from: .
    1. Bradley MM, Sabatinelli D, Lang PJ, Fitzsimmons JR, King WM, Desai P. Activation of the visual cortex in motivated attention. Behav Neurosci. 2003;117(2):369–380. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.2.369. Available from: .
    1. Codispoti M, Gerra G, Montebarocci O, Zaimovic A, Raggi MA, Baldaro B. Emotional perception and neuroendocrine changes. Psychophysiology. 2003;40(6):863–868. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.00104. Available from: .
    1. Keil A, Bradley MM, Hauk O, Rochstroh B, Elbert T, Lang PJ. Large-scale neural correlates of affective picture-processing. Psychophysiology. 2002;39(5):641–649. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3950641. Available from: .
    1. Larsen JT, Norris CJ, Cacioppo JT. Effects of positive and negative affect on electromyographic activity over zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii. Psychophysiology. 2003;40(5):776–785. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.00078. Available from: .
    1. Schupp HT, Cuthbert BN, Bradley MM, Hillman CH, Hamm AO, Lang PJ. Brain processes in emotional perception: Motivated attention. Cogn Emot. 2004;18(5):593–611. doi: 10.1080/02699930341000239. Available from: .
    1. Bradley MM, Lang PJ. The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in the Study of Emotion and Attention. In: Coan JA, Allen JJ, editors. Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. pp. 29–46.
    1. Bartussek D, Diedrich O, Naumann E, Collet W. Introversion-extraversion and event-related potential (ERP): A test of J.A. Gray's theory. Person Individ Diff. 1993;14(4):565–574. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90149-W. Available from: .
    1. Norris C, Larsen JT, Cacioppo JT. Neuroticism is associated with larger and more prolonged electrodermal responses to emotionally evocative picture. Psychophysiology. 2007;44(5):823–826. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00551.x. Available from: .
    1. Canli T, Zhao Z, Desmond JE, Kang E, Gross J, Gabrieli JD. An fMRI study of personality influences on brain reactivity to emotional stimuli. Behav Neurosci. 2001;115(1):33–42. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.115.1.33. Available from: .
    1. Osgood C, Suci G, Tannenbaum P. The measurement of meaning. Urabana, IL: University of Illinois Press; 1957.
    1. Tellegen A. Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In: Tuma AH, Maser JD, editors. Anxiety and anxiety disorders. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1985. pp. 681–706.
    1. Libkuman TM, Otani H, Kern R, Viger SG, Novak N. Multidimensional normative ratings for the International Affective Picture System. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):326–334. doi: 10.3758/BF03193164. Available from: .
    1. Duley RD, Conroy DE, Morris K, Wiley J, Janelle CM. Fear of Failure Biases Affective and Attentional Responses to Lexical and Pictorial Stimuli. Motiv Emot. 2005;29(1):1–17. doi: 10.1007/s11031-005-4413-1. Available from: .
    1. Borkenau P, Ostendorf F. NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1993. p. 5.
    1. Franke GH. Brief symptom inventory von Derogatis (BSI). Deutsche Fassung der Kurzform des SCL-90-R. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2001.
    1. Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994;25(1):49–59. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9. Available from: .

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera