Complication rates of trainee- versus attending-performed upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
David I Fudman, Kenneth R Falchuk, Joseph D Feuerstein, David I Fudman, Kenneth R Falchuk, Joseph D Feuerstein
Abstract
Background: Although esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is usually the first procedure trainees learn, it is not known whether the involvement of a trainee affects the procedure's complication rate, a key quality and safety indicator. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the complication rate of fellow-performed upper endoscopy differs from that of attending gastroenterologists, and whether that difference varies with the level of training.
Methods: Emergency room visits within 14 days of an outpatient EGD deemed to be probably or definitely related to the EGD were categorized as complications. Complication rates were calculated for attending- and trainee-performed gastrointestinal endoscopies, the latter stratified by level of training.
Results: Forty-five attendings and 43 fellows performed 21,899 EGDs during the study period. There were 43 complications (1.96 per 1000 EGDs). Procedures performed by any fellow were more likely to have a complication than those performed by an attending (odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-4.6). This difference was driven by a higher rate of complications among fellows who had completed general gastroenterology training and were in advanced training (OR 3.8, 95%CI 1.76-8.04); all of these complications involved trainees in interventional endoscopy. Fellows in any year of general gastroenterology training were not more likely to cause complications than attendings.
Conclusions: The rate of complications from EGDs performed by fellows in their general gastroenterology training does not differ from that of attending endoscopists. The complication rate of advanced trainees exceeded that of attendings, but this is likely to be attributable to the higher-risk interventions undertaken by fellows in interventional endoscopy.
Keywords: Endoscopy; complications; education; esophagogastroduodenoscopy; quality; safety; trainee.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: None
References
- Institute of Medicine. To err is human:Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
- Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm:A New Health System for the 21stCentury. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
- Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. New Engl J Med. 2010;362:1795–1803.
- Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:31–53.
- Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, et al. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States:2012 update. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:1179–1187.
- Park WG, Shaheen NJ, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for EGD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:17–30.
- Bielawska B, Day AG, Lieberman DA, Hookey LC. Risk factors for early colonoscopic perforation include non-gastroenterologist endoscopists:a multivariable analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:85–92.
- Anderson ML, Pasha TM, Leighton JA. Endoscopic perforation of the colon:lessons from a 10-year study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:3418–3422.
- Leffler DA, Kheraj R, Garud S, et al. The incidence and cost of unexpected hospital use after scheduled outpatient endoscopy. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1752–1757.
- Levin TR, Zhao W, Conell C, et al. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:880–886.
- Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Early DS, et al. ASGE Stards of Practice Committee. Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:707–718.
- Siegel AB, Yadlapati R, Keswani RN, Gregory DL. Sa1082 risk factors for unplanned hospitalization following ambulatory upper endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:AB183–AB184.
- Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG, et al. Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1223–1231.
- Elhanafi S, Chhana R, Mallawaarachchi I, et al. Effects of starting a gastroenterology fellowship training program on quality measures of colonoscopy. South Med J. 2017;110:200–206.
- Qayed E, Shea L, Goebel S, Bostick RM. Association of trainee participation with adenoma and polyp detection rates. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;9:204–210.
- Patwardhan VR, Feuerstein JD, Sengupta N, et al. Fellowship colonoscopy training and preparedness for independent gastroenterology practice. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;50:45–51.
- Ward ST, Hancox A, Mohammed MA, et al. The learning curve to achieve satisfactory completion rates in upper GI endoscopy:an analysis of a national training database. Gut. 2017;66:1022–1033.
- Ward ST, Mohammed MA, Walt R, Valori R, Ismail T, Dunckley P. An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database. Gut. 2014;63:1746–1754.
- Jowell PS, Baillie J, Branch MS, Affronti J, Browning CL, Bute BP. Quantitative assessment of procedural competence. A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:983–989.
- Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Nicklas M, et al. Impact of skill and experience of the endoscopist on the outcome of endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:628–636.
- Testoni PA, Mariani A, Giussani A, et al. SEIFRED Group. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high- and low-volume centers and among expert and non-expert operators:a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1753–1761.
- Fudman DI, Lightdale CJ, Poneros JM, et al. Positive correlation between endoscopist radiofrequency ablation volume and response rates in Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:71–77.
- Pasricha S, Cotton C, Hathorn KE, et al. Effects of the learning curve on efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:890–896.e2.
Source: PubMed