Risk assessment of morbidly obese parturient in cesarean section delivery: A prospective, cohort, single-center study

Xiaohu An, Yanhong Zhao, Ying Zhang, Qiling Yang, Yilong Wang, Weiwei Cheng, Zeyong Yang, Xiaohu An, Yanhong Zhao, Ying Zhang, Qiling Yang, Yilong Wang, Weiwei Cheng, Zeyong Yang

Abstract

Background: Up to 40% of women gain excessive weight during pregnancy. Obesity complications and risks in parturient women undergoing cesarean section (CS) with different anesthetic methods remain unknown. This study aimed to assess the safety and risk of obese women undergoing CS delivery with various perioperative anesthetic methods.

Methods: Seven hundred ninety parturient women underwent CS under general anesthesia (GA), intraspinal anesthesia including epidural anesthesia (EA) and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA). They were divided into morbid (n = 255), severe (n = 274), and non-obesity (n = 261) groups. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT03002636).

Result: Between 2013 and 2016, 790 pregnant were assessed. Compared with the non-obesity group, there were significantly more fetal distress and higher body mass index (BMI) in the morbid obesity group (P = .0001 and P = .001, respectively). Significantly more patients showed preeclampsia, multifetation, amniotic fluid abnormality, and high bleeding amounts in the morbid obesity group compared with the non-obesity group (P = .0001, P = .048, P = .017, and P = .018, respectively); more patients were administered EA and GA compared with the non-obesity group (P = .0001 and P = .0001, respectively). More post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) patients were found in the severe obesity group no more than the non-obesity group. Significantly increased anesthesia puncture times for 5 > n ≥ 3 and n ≥ 5 were obtained in the morbid obesity group (P = .0001 and P = .0001, respectively), with more patients in the puncture sitting position, compared with the non-obesity group (P = .0001).

Conclusion: GA, EA, and CSEA are safe and effective in severely or morbidly obese patients. Morbidly obese parturient show increased likelihood for fetal distress, PACU, sitting position puncture, puncture difficulty, and other pregnancy complications. There were more anesthesia puncture times in morbidly obese patients.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Between January 1, 2013 and September 30, 2016, a total of 892 women met inclusion criteria, including 810 women received allocated intervention (Fig. 1). The medical records of 5, 6, and 9 women were lost in the morbid obesity, severe obesity, and non-obesity groups, respectively. A total of 790 patients completed the protocol, and 20 women did not complete it for missing baseline characteristics.

References

    1. Donohoe CL, Feeney C, Carey MF, et al. Perioperative evaluation of the obese patients. J Clin Anesth 2011;23:575–86.
    1. Lemmens HJ. Perioperative pharmacology in morbid obesity. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010;23:485–91.
    1. Simas TA, Liao X, Garrison A, et al. Impact of updated Institute of Medicine guidelines on prepregnancy body mass index categorization, gestational weight gain recommendations, and needed counseling. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011;20:837–44.
    1. Bader AM. Chestnut D. Neurologic and neuromuscular diseases. Obstetric Anesthesia: Principles and Practice 3rd ed.Pennsylvania: Elsevier Mosby; 2004. 872–91.
    1. Perlow JH, Morgan MA. Massive maternal obesity and perioperative cesarean morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:560–5.
    1. Weiss JL, Malone FD, Emig D, et al. Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate—a population-based screening study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:1091–7.
    1. Wataba K, Mizutani T, Wasada K, et al. Impact of prepregnant body mass index and maternal weight gain on the risk of pregnancy complications in Japanese women. Acta Obstet Gynecol 2006;85:269–76.
    1. Murakami M, Ohmichi M, Takahashi T, et al. Prepregnancy body mass index as an important predictor of perinatal outcomes in Japanese. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005;271:311–5.
    1. Larsen CE, Serdula MK, Sullivan KM. Macro-somia: influence of maternal overweight among a low-income population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:490–4.
    1. Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP, et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287 213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001;25:1175–82.
    1. Johnson JW, Longmate JA, Frentzen B. Excessive maternal weight and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:353–70.
    1. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anaesthesia. Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2007;106:843–63.
    1. Lai HY, Tsai PS, Fan YC, et al. Anesthetic practice for Caesarean section and factors influencing anesthesiologists’ choice of anesthesia: a population-based study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2014;58:843–50.
    1. Ajuzieogu OV, Ezike HA, Amucheazi AO, et al. A retrospective study of the outcome of cesarean section for women with severe pre-eclampsia in a third world setting. Saudi J Anaesth 2011;4:15–8.
    1. Moodley J, Jjuuko G, Rout C. Epidural compared with general anaesthesia for caesarean delivery in conscious women with eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;108:378–82.
    1. Lamon AM, Habib AS. Managing anesthesia for cesarean section in obese patients: current perspectives. Local Reg Anesth 2016;16:45–57.
    1. Garabedian MJ, Williams CM, Pearce CF, et al. Extreme morbid obesity and labor outcome in nulliparous women at term. Am J Perinatol 2011;28:729–34.
    1. Vallejo MC. Anesthetic management of the morbidly obese parturient. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2007;20:175–80.
    1. Allison CL, Howell S. Neurological complications in obstetric regional anaesthesia. Anesth Intensive Care Med 2013;8:331–2.
    1. Kowe O, Waters JH. Neurologic complications in the patient receiving obstetric anesthesia. Neurol Clin 2012;30:823–33.
    1. Sviggum HP, Jacob AK, Arendt KW, et al. Neurologic complications after chlorhexidine antisepsis for spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012;37:139–44.
    1. Staikou C, Tsaroucha A, Vakas P, et al. Maternal and umbilical cord oxygen content and acid-base balance in relation to general, epidural or subarachnoid anesthesia for term elective cesarean section. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2013;40:367–71.
    1. Kuczkowski KM, Benumof JL. Repeat cesarean section in a morbidly obese parturient: a new anesthetic option. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46:753–4.
    1. Mhyre JM, Riesner MN, Polley LS, et al. A series of anesthesia-related maternal deaths in Michigan, 1985–2003. Anesthesiology 2007;106:1096–104.
    1. Sobhy S, Zamora J, Dharmarajah K, et al. Anaesthesia-related maternal mortality in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2016;4:e320–7.
    1. Machado LS. Cesarean section in morbidly obese parturients: practical implications andcomplications. N Am J Med Sci 2012;4:13–8.
    1. Alanis MC, Villers MS, Law TL, et al. Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:271.1–7.
    1. Endler GC. The risk of anesthesia in obese parturients. J Perinatol 1990;10:175–9.
    1. Vricella LK, Louis JM, Mercer BM, et al. Anesthesia complications during scheduled cesarean delivery for morbidly obese women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:e1–5.
    1. Whitty RJ, Maxwell CV, Carvalho JC. Complications of neuraxial anesthesia in an extreme morbidly obese patient for Cesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2007;16:139–44.
    1. Hood DD, Dewan DM. Anesthetic and obstetric outcome in morbidly obese parturients. Anesthesiology 1993;79:1210–8.
    1. Keerath K, Cronje L. Observational study of choice of anaesthesia and outcome in patients with severe preeclampsia who present for emergency caesarean section. Southern Afr J Anaesth Analg 2012;4:206–12.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera