Rationale and study design of the MINERVA study: Multicentre Investigation of Novel Electrocardiogram Risk markers in Ventricular Arrhythmia prediction-UK multicentre collaboration

G Andre Ng, Amar Mistry, Michelle Newton, Fernando Soares Schlindwein, Craig Barr, Matthew Gd Bates, Jane Caldwell, Moloy Das, Mohsin Farooq, Neil Herring, Pier Lambiase, Faizel Osman, Manav Sohal, Andrew Staniforth, Muzahir Tayebjee, David Tomlinson, Zachary Whinnett, Arthur Yue, Will B Nicolson, G Andre Ng, Amar Mistry, Michelle Newton, Fernando Soares Schlindwein, Craig Barr, Matthew Gd Bates, Jane Caldwell, Moloy Das, Mohsin Farooq, Neil Herring, Pier Lambiase, Faizel Osman, Manav Sohal, Andrew Staniforth, Muzahir Tayebjee, David Tomlinson, Zachary Whinnett, Arthur Yue, Will B Nicolson

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of two new ECG markers (Regional Repolarisation Instability Index (R2I2) and Peak Electrical Restitution Slope) to predict sudden cardiac death (SCD) or ventricular arrhythmia (VA) events in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy undergoing implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for primary prevention indication.

Methods and analysis: Multicentre Investigation of Novel Electrocardiogram Risk markers in Ventricular Arrhythmia prediction is a prospective, open label, single blinded, multicentre observational study to establish the efficacy of two ECG biomarkers in predicting VA risk. 440 participants with ischaemic cardiomyopathy undergoing routine first time implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation for primary prevention indication are currently being recruited. An electrophysiological (EP) study is performed using a non-invasive programmed electrical stimulation protocol via the implanted device. All participants will undergo the EP study hence no randomisation is required. Participants will be followed up over a minimum of 18 months and up to 3 years. The first patient was recruited in August 2016 and the study will be completed at the final participant follow-up visit. The primary endpoint is ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia >200 beats/min as recorded by the ICD. The secondary endpoint is SCD. Analysis of the ECG data obtained during the EP study will be performed by the core lab where blinding of patient health status and endpoints will be maintained.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been granted by Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (reference no. 16/NI/0069). The results will inform the design of a definitive Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT). Dissemination will include peer reviewed journal articles reporting the qualitative and quantitative results, as well as presentations at conferences and lay summaries.

Trial registration number: NCT03022487.

Keywords: heart failure; ischaemic heart disease; pacing & electrophysiology.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The University of Leicester has applied for a patent for the R2I2 and PERS ECG markers on behalf of WBN and GAN. GAN reports research fellow support from Boston Scientific Ltd and Abbott Ltd.AM’s salary is supported by Abbott (formerly St Jude Medical).

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart. EP, electrophysiological; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; PI, Principal Investigator.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of captured stimulus. For valid data, the final two S1 of the drive train and S2 must successfully capture in succession, or else the drive train should be repeated.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Derivation of Regional Restitution Instability Index (R2I2) and Peak ECG Restitution Slope (PERS). (A) Stimulation protocol demonstrating the fiducial points of TpeakQ and QTpeak (blue) which are required to plot on the restitution curve (B) gradients are fitted for each 40 ms overlapping least square linear segment. The mean of the SD of gradient differences from the mean gradient is taken as the R2I2. The mean of the peak restitution curve slope is calculated to be the PERS value (reproduced with permission from Nicolson 2014).

References

    1. Chugh SS, Reinier K, Teodorescu C, et al. . Epidemiology of sudden cardiac death: clinical and research implications. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2008;51:213–28. 10.1016/j.pcad.2008.06.003
    1. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, et al. . Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1933–40. 10.1056/NEJM199612263352601
    1. Buxton AE, Lee KL, Fisher JD, et al. . A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. multicenter Unsustained tachycardia trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1882–90. 10.1056/NEJM199912163412503
    1. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, et al. . Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:877–83. 10.1056/NEJMoa013474
    1. Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, et al. . Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005;352:225–37. 10.1056/NEJMoa043399
    1. Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, et al. . Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2140–50. 10.1056/NEJMoa032423
    1. Murgatroyd F, Linker N, Cunningham D, et al. . NICOR: national audit of cardiac rhythm management devices, 2016. Available:
    1. Myerburg RJ, Kessler KM, Castellanos A. Sudden cardiac death. Structure, function, and time-dependence of risk. Circulation 1992;85:I2–10.
    1. Gould PA, Krahn AD, Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Working Group on Device Advisories . Complications associated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator replacement in response to device advisories. JAMA 2006;295:1907–11. 10.1001/jama.295.16.1907
    1. Taggart P, Sutton P, Chalabi Z, et al. . Effect of adrenergic stimulation on action potential duration restitution in humans. Circulation 2003;107:285–9. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000044941.13346.74
    1. Chen PS, Garfinkel A, Weiss JN, et al. . Spirals, chaos, and new mechanisms of wave propagation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997;20:414–21. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb06200.x
    1. Karma A. Electrical alternans and spiral wave breakup in cardiac tissue. Chaos 1994;4:461–72. 10.1063/1.166024
    1. Weiss JN, Chen PS, Qu Z, et al. . Ventricular fibrillation: how do we stop the waves from breaking? Circ Res 2000;87:1103–7. 10.1161/01.res.87.12.1103
    1. Banville I, Gray RA. Effect of action potential duration and conduction velocity restitution and their spatial dispersion on alternans and the stability of arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2002;13:1141–9. 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.01141.x
    1. Liu DW, Gintant GA, Antzelevitch C. Ionic bases for electrophysiological distinctions among epicardial, midmyocardial, and endocardial myocytes from the free wall of the canine left ventricle. Circ Res 1993;72:671–87. 10.1161/01.RES.72.3.671
    1. Pak H-N, Hong SJ, Hwang GS, et al. . Spatial dispersion of action potential duration restitution kinetics is associated with induction of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation in humans. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2004;15:1357–63. 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.03569.x
    1. Ng GA, Mistry A, Li X, et al. . LifeMap: towards the development of a new technology in sudden cardiac death risk stratification for clinical use. Europace 2018;20:f162–70. 10.1093/europace/euy080
    1. Nicolson WB, McCann GP, Brown PD, et al. . A novel surface electrocardiogram-based marker of ventricular arrhythmia risk in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Heart Assoc 2012;1:e001552. 10.1161/JAHA.112.001552
    1. Nicolson WB, McCann GP, Smith MI, et al. . Prospective evaluation of two novel ECG-based restitution biomarkers for prediction of sudden cardiac death risk in ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Heart 2014;100:1878–85. 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305672
    1. National Institute for Health and Care . Excellence implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronisation therapy for arrhythmias and heart failure. NICE guideline (TA314) 2014.
    1. Wilkoff BL, Fauchier L, Stiles MK, et al. . 2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing. J Arrhythm 2016;32:1–28. 10.1016/j.joa.2015.12.001
    1. Pinski SL, Shewchick J, Tobin M, et al. . Safety and diagnostic yield of noninvasive ventricular stimulation performed via tiered therapy implantable defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994;17:2263–73. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb02374.x
    1. Moss AJ, Schuger C, Beck CA, et al. . Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through ICD programming. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2275–83. 10.1056/NEJMoa1211107

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera