Emotional Meaning in Context in Relation to Hypomanic Personality Traits: An ERP Study

Sarah Terrien, Pamela Gobin, Alexandre Coutté, Flavien Thuaire, Galina Iakimova, Pascale Mazzola-Pomietto, Chrystel Besche-Richard, Sarah Terrien, Pamela Gobin, Alexandre Coutté, Flavien Thuaire, Galina Iakimova, Pascale Mazzola-Pomietto, Chrystel Besche-Richard

Abstract

The ability to integrate contextual information is important for the comprehension of emotional and social situations. While some studies have shown that emotional processes and social cognition are impaired in people with hypomanic personality trait, no results have been reported concerning the neurophysiological processes mediating the processing of emotional information during the integration of contextual social information in this population. We therefore chose to conduct an ERP study dealing with the integration of emotional information in a population with hypomanic personality trait. Healthy participants were evaluated using the Hypomanic Personality Scale (HPS), and ERPs were recorded during a linguistic task in which participants silently read sentence pairs describing short social situations. The first sentence implicitly conveyed the positive or negative emotional state of a character. The second sentence was emotionally congruent or incongruent with the first sentence. We analyzed the difference in the modulation of two components (N400 and LPC) in response to the emotional word present at the end of the "target" sentences as a function of the HPS score and the emotional valence of the context. Our results showed a possible modulation of the N400 component in response to both positive and negative context among the participants who scored high on the Mood Volatility subscale of the Hypomanic Personality Scale. These results seem to indicate that the participants with hypomanic personality traits exhibited specificities in the integration of emotions at the level of the early-mobilized neurocognitive processes (N400). Participants with hypomanic personality traits found it difficult to integrate negative emotional contexts, while simultaneously exhibiting an enhanced integration of positive emotional contexts.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Trial procedure.
Fig 1. Trial procedure.
Each trial had the following structure: a fixation point was presented in the center of the screen (2000 ms), followed by a context sentence (3500 ms) and a target sentence, with each word being presented sequentially (500 ms for each word). Each trial was followed by a black screen which was displayed for 750 ms.
Fig 2. ERPs for the three central…
Fig 2. ERPs for the three central electrodes and topographical representations for the Low Mood Volatility-HPS and the High Mood Volatility-HPS as a function of type of Emotional valence and Congruency.

References

    1. Akhtar S (1998) Hypomanic personality disorder. Integrative Psychiatry 6: 37–52.
    1. Eckblad M, Chapman LJ (1986) Development and validation of a scale for hypomanic personality. J Abnorm Psychol 95: 214–222.
    1. McCarthy-Jones S, Knowles R, Rowse G (2012) More than words? Hypomanic personality traits, visual imagery and verbal thought in young adults. Conscious Cogn 21: 1375–1381. 10.1016/j.concog.2012.07.004
    1. Schalet BD, Durbin CE, Revelle W (2011) Multidimensional structure of the Hypomanic Personality Scale. Psychol Assess 23: 504–522. 10.1037/a0022301
    1. Kwapil TR, Miller MB, Zinser MC, Chapman LJ, Chapman J and Eckblad M al. (2000) A longitudinal study of high scorers on the Hypomanic Personality Scale. J Abnorm Psychol 109: 222–226.
    1. Miller CJ, Johnson SL, Kwapil TR, Carver CS (2011) Three studies on self-report scales to detect bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord 128: 199–210. 10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.012
    1. Bora E, Vahip S, Gonul AS, Akdeniz F, Alkan M, Ogut M, et al. (2005) Evidence for theory of mind deficits in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 112: 110–116.
    1. Kohler CG, Richard JA, Brensinger CM, Borgmann-Winter KE, Conroy CG, Moberg PJ, et al. (2014) Facial emotion perception differs in young persons at genetic and clinical high-risk for psychosis. Psychiatry Res 216: 206–212. 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.01.023
    1. Martino DJ, Strejilevich SA, Fassi G, Marengo E, Igoa A (2011) Theory of mind and facial emotion recognition in euthymic bipolar I and bipolar II disorders. Psychiatry Res 189: 379–384. 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.04.033
    1. Kerr N, Dunbar RI, Bentall RP (2003) Theory of mind deficits in bipolar affective disorder. J Affect Disord 73: 253–259.
    1. Samame C, Martino DJ, Strejilevich SA (2012) Social cognition in euthymic bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analytic approach. Acta Psychiatr Scand 125: 266–280. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01808.x
    1. Terrien S, Stefaniak N, Blondel M, Mouras H, Morvan Y, Besche-Richard C (2014) Theory of mind and hypomanic traits in general population. Psychiatry Res 30: 694–9.
    1. Heissler J, Kanske P, Schonfelder S, Wessa M (2014) Inefficiency of emotion regulation as vulnerability marker for bipolar disorder: evidence from healthy individuals with hypomanic personality. J Affect Disord 152–154: 83–90. 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.001
    1. Gruber J, Johnson SL, Oveis C, Keltner D (2008) Risk for mania and positive emotional responding: too much of a good thing? Emotion 8: 23–33. 10.1037/1528-3542.8.1.23
    1. Johnson SL, Gruber JL, Eisner LR. Emotion and bipolar disorder In: Rottenberg J, Johnson SL, editors. Emotion and psychopathology. American psychological association; 2007. pp. 123–160.
    1. Baez S, Herrera E, Villarin L, Theil D, Gonzalez-Gadea ML, Gomez P, et al. (2013) Contextual social cognition impairments in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. PLoS One 8: e57664 10.1371/journal.pone.0057664
    1. Kutas M, Federmeier KD (2000) Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 463–470.
    1. Hagoort P (1993) Impairments of lexical-semantic processing in aphasia: evidence from the processing of lexical ambiguities. Brain Lang 45: 189–232.
    1. Coulson S, King JW, Kutas M (1998) Expect the unexpected: eventrelated brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Lang Cogn Process 13: 21–58.
    1. Iakimova G, Passerieux C, Laurent JP, Hardy-Bayle MC (2005) ERPs of metaphoric, literal, and incongruous semantic processing in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology 42: 380–390.
    1. Andreou C, Bozikas VP, Ramnalis A, Giannakou M, Fokas K (2013) Semantic priming in remitted patients with bipolar disorder. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 44: 48–52. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.07.014
    1. Ryu V, An SK, Ha RY, Kim JA, Ha K, Cho HS (2012) Differential alteration of automatic semantic processing in treated patients affected by bipolar mania and schizophrenia: an N400 study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 38: 194–200. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.03.009
    1. Cermolacce M, Faugere M, Micoulaud-Franchi JA, Belzeaux R, Maurel M, Naudin J, et al. (2014) Natural speech comprehension in bipolar disorders: an event-related brain potential study among manic patients. J Affect Disord 158: 161–171. 10.1016/j.jad.2013.11.013
    1. Holt DJ, Lynn SK, Kuperberg GR (2009) Neurophysiological correlates of comprehending emotional meaning in context. J Cogn Neurosci 21: 2245–2262. 10.1162/jocn.2008.21151
    1. Kolk H, Chwilla D (2007) Late positivities in unusual situations. Brain Lang 100: 257–261.
    1. Van Rheenen TE, Rossell SL (2014) Multimodal emotion integration in bipolar disorder: an investigation of involuntary cross-modal influences between facial and prosodic channels. JINS 20: 525–533. 10.1017/S1355617714000253
    1. Deltour JJ (2005) Échelle de vocabulaire Mill Hill Les Éditions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
    1. Hall JA, Matsumoto D (2004) Gender differences in judgments of multiple emotions from facial expressions. Emotion (Washington, DC) 4: 201–206.
    1. Mill A, Allik J, Realo A, Valk R (2009) Age-related differences in emotion recognition ability: a cross-sectional study. Emotion (Washington, DC) 9: 619–630.
    1. Demenescu LR, Mathiak KA, Mathiak K (2014) Age- and gender-related variations of emotion recognition in pseudowords and faces. Exp Aging Res 40: 187–207. 10.1080/0361073X.2014.882210
    1. Pratt NL, Kelly SD (2008) Emotional states influence the neural processing of affective language. Soc Neurosci 3: 434–442. 10.1080/17470910802188339

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera