Circular pOlyethylene drape in preVEntion of suRgical site infection (COVER trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Ri Na Yoo, Hyung Jin Kim, Jae Im Lee, Won-Kyung Kang, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Chang Woo Kim, Sung Uk Bae, Soomin Nam, Byung Mo Kang, Ri Na Yoo, Hyung Jin Kim, Jae Im Lee, Won-Kyung Kang, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Chang Woo Kim, Sung Uk Bae, Soomin Nam, Byung Mo Kang

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical site infection (SSI) after abdominal surgery remains a significant cause of morbidity and is associated with an increased socioeconomic burden and a reduced quality of life. Circular wound protectors have been expected to reduce the risk of SSI, but previous studies reported conflicting results on their protective effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of circular wound protectors in reducing SSI in open abdominal surgery.

Methods and analysis: The circular pOlyethylen drape in preVEntion of suRgical site infection (COVER) trial investigates whether the application of a dual-ring circular plastic wound protector reduces the rate of SSI in patients undergoing elective or emergent open abdominal surgery related to the gastrointestinal tract, regardless of the type of wound classified by the Centers for Disease Control. The COVER trial is a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial with two parallel arms-one using a dual-ring wound protector with circular polyethylene drape and the other using conventional surgical dressing gauze. The primary outcome will measure the rate of SSI within 30 days after surgery in two groups. Statistical analysis of the primary end point will be based on the intention-to-treat population. The sample size was determined to achieve a study power of 80% with 95% two-sided confidence limits. Considering a dropout rate of up to 5%, a total of 458 patients, 229 patients in each group, will be enrolled in this study.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial protocol and informed consent document have been reviewed and approved by the institutional review board at each participating centre. Written informed consent will be obtained from each study participant. The clinical outcomes of this trial will be submitted to an international peer-reviewed journal and presented at international conferences.

Trial registration number: NCT03170843.

Keywords: gastroenterology; infection control; surgery; wound management.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial flow.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SPIRIT figure. PO, postoperative; SSI, surgical site infection.

References

    1. De Pastena M, Paiella S, Marchegiani G, et al. . Postoperative infections represent a major determinant of outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results from a high-volume center. Surgery 2017;162:792–801. 10.1016/j.surg.2017.05.016
    1. Badia JM, Casey AL, Petrosillo N, et al. . Impact of surgical site infection on healthcare costs and patient outcomes: a systematic review in six European countries. J Hosp Infect 2017;96:1–15. 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.03.004
    1. Mujagic E, Marti WR, Coslovsky M, et al. . Associations of hospital length of stay with surgical site infections. World J Surg 2018;42:3888–96. 10.1007/s00268-018-4733-4
    1. Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, et al. . Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National nosocomial infections surveillance system. Am J Med 1991;91:152s–7. 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90361-z
    1. Smith RL, Bohl JK, McElearney ST, et al. . Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg 2004;239:599–607. discussion -7 10.1097/01.sla.0000124292.21605.99
    1. Hernandez K, Ramos E, Seas C, et al. . Incidence of and risk factors for surgical-site infections in a Peruvian hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:473–7. 10.1086/502570
    1. Ruiz-Tovar J, Alonso N, Morales V, et al. . Association between triclosan-coated sutures for abdominal wall closure and incisional surgical site infection after open surgery in patients presenting with fecal peritonitis: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Infect 2015;16:588–94. 10.1089/sur.2014.072
    1. Pinkney TD, Calvert M, Bartlett DC, et al. . Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI trial). BMJ 2013;347:f4305 10.1136/bmj.f4305
    1. Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, et al. . The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Technol Assess 2001;5:1–194. 10.3310/hta5220
    1. Psaila JV, Wheeler MH, Crosby DL. The role of plastic wound drapes in the prevention of wound infection following abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 1977;64:729–32. 10.1002/bjs.1800641012
    1. Nyström PO, Broomé A, Höjer H, et al. . A controlled trial of a plastic wound ring drape to prevent contamination and infection in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:451–3. 10.1007/BF02555535
    1. Mihaljevic AL, Schirren R, Özer M, et al. . Multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial of standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings versus coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections: a CHIR-Net trial (BaFO; NCT01181206). Ann Surg 2014;260:730–9. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000954
    1. Horiuchi T, Tanishima H, Tamagawa K, et al. . Randomized, controlled investigation of the anti-infective properties of the alexis retractor/protector of incision sites. J Trauma 2007;62:212–5. 10.1097/
    1. National Healthcare Safety Network, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Surgical site infection (SSI) event. Available: [Accessed 25 Jan 2017].
    1. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. . The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250:187–96. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
    1. Barie PS. Surgical site infections: epidemiology and prevention. Surg Infect 2002;3 Suppl 1:s9–21. 10.1089/sur.2002.3.s1-9
    1. International Conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use (ICH) adopts consolidated guideline on good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Int Dig Health Legis 1997;48:231–4.
    1. Owens CD, Stoessel K. Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention. J Hosp Infect 2008;70 Suppl 2:3–10. 10.1016/S0195-6701(08)60017-1
    1. Leaper DJ, van Goor H, Reilly J, et al. . Surgical site infection - a European perspective of incidence and economic burden. Int Wound J 2004;1:247–73. 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2004.00067.x
    1. Mangram AJ. A brief overview of the 1999 CDC guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection. centers for disease control and prevention. J Chemother 2001;13 Spec No 1:35–9. 10.1179/joc.2001.13.Supplement-2.35
    1. Alexander JW, Solomkin JS, Edwards MJ. Updated recommendations for control of surgical site infections. Ann Surg 2011;253:1082–93. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821175f8
    1. Berríos-Torres SI. Evidence-Based update to the U.S. centers for disease control and prevention and healthcare infection control practices Advisory Committee guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection: developmental process. Surg Infect 2016;17:256–61. 10.1089/sur.2015.264
    1. Gulland A. Who launches global guidelines to stop surgical site infections. BMJ 2016;355:i5942 10.1136/bmj.i5942
    1. Mueller TC, Loos M, Haller B, et al. . Intra-Operative wound irrigation to reduce surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2015;400:167–81. 10.1007/s00423-015-1279-x
    1. Yoshioka T, Kondo Y, Fujiwara T. Successful wound treatment using negative pressure wound therapy without primary closure in a patient undergoing highly contaminated abdominal surgery. Surg Case Rep 2018;4:85 10.1186/s40792-018-0493-5
    1. Acosta S, Björck M, Wanhainen A. Negative-Pressure wound therapy for prevention and treatment of surgical-site infections after vascular surgery. Br J Surg 2017;104:e75–84. 10.1002/bjs.10403
    1. Kang SI, Oh H-K, Kim MH, et al. . Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the clinical effectiveness of impervious plastic wound protectors in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Surgery 2018;164:939–45. 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.024
    1. Mihaljevic AL, Müller TC, Kehl V, et al. . Wound edge protectors in open abdominal surgery to reduce surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0121187 10.1371/journal.pone.0121187
    1. Reid K, Pockney P, Draganic B, et al. . Barrier wound protection decreases surgical site infection in open elective colorectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2010;53:1374–80. 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181ed3f7e
    1. Cheng KP, Roslani AC, Sehha N, et al. . ALEXIS O-Ring wound retractor vs conventional wound protection for the prevention of surgical site infections in colorectal resections(1). Colorectal Dis 2012;14:e346–51. 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02943.x
    1. Alexander M, Perera G, Ford L, et al. . Age-Stratified prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and dementia in European populations: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis 2015;48:355–9. 10.3233/JAD-150168
    1. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. . Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) hospital infection control practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:97–132.
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. . Spirit 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586 10.1136/bmj.e7586
    1. Sanger PC, Simianu VV, Gaskill CE, et al. . Diagnosing surgical site infection using wound photography: a Scenario-Based study. J Am Coll Surg 2017;224:8–15. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.027

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera