Handheld ECG Tracking of in-hOspital Atrial Fibrillation (HECTO-AF): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Marco Mancinetti, Sara Schukraft, Yannick Faucherre, Stéphane Cook, Diego Arroyo, Serban Puricel, Marco Mancinetti, Sara Schukraft, Yannick Faucherre, Stéphane Cook, Diego Arroyo, Serban Puricel

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequent and causes substantial morbidity through AF-related strokes. Given the increasing prevalence of AF, screening methods are of interest given the potential to initiate timely appropriate anticoagulation. Aims: The HECTO-AF trial aims to determine the efficacy of AF screening with a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) handheld device in naïve in-hospital patients. Methods: The HECTO-AF is a single-center, open label, randomized controlled trial. Patients admitted to the general internal medicine ward of the University and Hospital Fribourg without previous diagnosis of AF were invited to participate in a screening program with a 1:1 allocation to either the screening group with intermittent single-lead handheld ECG recordings vs. a control group undergoing detection of AF as per routine clinical practice. The primary outcome was the prevalence of newly diagnosed AF during the hospital stay. Enrolment was terminated for poor patient recruitment and apparent futility before a sufficient sample for powered efficacy comparisons was enrolled. Results: A total of 804 patients were included of whom 381 were allocated to the intervention and 423 to the control group. Mean age was 65 ± 16 and 464 (58%) were male. Median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3 (13% heart failure, 57% hypertension, 19% diabetes mellitus, 14% prior stroke/transient ischemic attack, and 29% arterial disease) and all CHA2DS2-VASc risk factors were equally distributed between groups. The incidence of newly detected AF was 1.4% over a median of 6 hospitalized days. Seven patients (1.8%) were diagnosed with AF in the intervention group vs. 3 (0.7%) in the control group (p = 0.20). Conclusion: There was a trend toward a higher AF detection over a median of 6 hospitalized days in the intervention group, but a definitive conclusion cannot be drawn due to the early termination of the present study. Systematic screening for AF in the hospital setting is resource-consuming, and of uncertain clinical benefit. The interpretation of single-lead handheld ECG is challenging and may result in inaccurate AF diagnosis. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier [NCT03197090].

Keywords: ECG handheld device; atrial fibrillation; prevention; screening; stroke.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Mancinetti, Schukraft, Faucherre, Cook, Arroyo and Puricel.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart. Participants are 1:1 randomized to either handheld single-lead ECG (Zenicor) screening or control group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Single-lead ECG recording and interpretation with the Zenicor device. (A) Thirty second single-lead ECG handheld device recording, (B) analysis of the ECG on the central server, and (C) final validation by two cardiologists in case of newly detected AF. AF, atrial fibrillation; ECG, electrocardiogram.

References

    1. Di Carlo A, Bellino L, Consoli D, Mori F, Zaninelli A, Baldereschi M, et al. . Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the Italian elderly population and projections from 2020 to 2060 for Italy and the European Union: the FAI Project. Europace. (2019) 21:1468–75. 10.1093/europace/euz141
    1. Miyasaka Y, Barnes Marion E, Gersh Bernard J, Cha Stephen S, Bailey Kent R, Abhayaratna Walter P, et al. . Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000 and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. (2006) 114:119–25. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595140
    1. Kim MH, Johnston SS, Chu B-C, Dalal MR, Schulman KL. Estimation of total incremental health care costs in patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. (2011) 4:313–20. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.958165
    1. Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, Israel CW, Van Gelder IC, Capucci A, et al. . Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med. (2012) 366:120–9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1105575
    1. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, et al. . 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. (2016) 37:2893–962. 10.5603/KP.2016.0172
    1. Jones NR, Taylor CJ, Hobbs FDR, Bowman L, Casadei B. Screening for atrial fibrillation: a call for evidence. Eur Heart J. (2019) 41:1075–85. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz834
    1. Doliwa PS, Frykman V, Rosenqvist M. Short-term ECG for out of hospital detection of silent atrial fibrillation episodes. Scand Cardiovasc J. (2009) 43:163–8. 10.1080/14017430802593435
    1. Schukraft S, Mancinetti M, Hayoz D, Faucherre Y, Cook S, Arroyo D, et al. . Handheld ECG Tracking of in-hOspital Atrial Fibrillation the HECTO-AF trial Clinical Study Protocol. Trials. (2019) 20:92. 10.1186/s13063-019-3189-7
    1. Gargiulo G, Goette A, Tijssen J, Eckardt L, Lewalter T, Vranckx P, et al. . Safety and efficacy outcomes of double vs. triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation following percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant-based randomized clinical trials. Eur Heart J. (2019) 40:3757–67. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz732
    1. Fitzmaurice DA, Hobbs FDR, Jowett S, Mant J, Murray ET, Holder R, et al. . Screening versus routine practice in detection of atrial fibrillation in patients aged 65 or over: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. (2007) 335:383. 10.1136/bmj.39280.660567.55
    1. Morgan S, Mant D. Randomised trial of two approaches to screening for atrial fibrillation in UK general practice. Br J Gen Pract. (2002) 52:373–80.
    1. Halcox JPJ, Wareham K, Cardew A, Gilmore M, Barry JP, Phillips C, et al. . Assessment of remote heart rhythm sampling using the AliveCor heart monitor to screen for atrial fibrillation: the REHEARSE-AF study. Circulation. (2017) 136:1784–94. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030583
    1. Svennberg E, Engdahl J, Al-Khalili F, Friberg L, Frykman V, Rosenqvist M. Mass screening for untreated atrial fibrillation: the STROKESTOP study. Circulation. (2015) 131:2176–84. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014343
    1. Perez MV, Mahaffey KW, Hedlin H, Rumsfeld JS, Garcia A, Ferris T, et al. . Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. (2019) 381:1909–17. 10.1056/NEJMoa1901183
    1. Jonas DE, Kahwati LC, Yun JDY, Middleton JC, Coker-Schwimmer M, Asher GN. Screening for atrial fibrillation with electrocardiography: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. (2018) 320:485–98. 10.1001/jama.2018.4190
    1. Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, Davidson KW, et al. . Screening for atrial fibrillation with electrocardiography: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. (2018) 320:478–84. 10.1001/jama.2018.10321
    1. Walkey AJ, Hammill BG, Curtis LH, Benjamin EJ. Long-term outcomes following development of new-onset atrial fibrillation during sepsis. Chest. (2014) 146:1187–95. 10.1378/chest.14-0003
    1. Gundlund A, Olesen JB, Butt JH, Christensen MA, Gislason GH, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. . One-year outcomes in atrial fibrillation presenting during infections: a nationwide registry-based study. Eur Heart J. (2020) 41:1112–9. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz873
    1. Quon MJ, Behlouli H, Pilote L. Anticoagulant use and risk of ischemic stroke and bleeding in patients with secondary atrial fibrillation associated with acute coronary syndromes, acute pulmonary disease, or sepsis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. (2018) 4:386–93. 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.08.003

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera