Efficacy and Safety of the Reduced Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Stratified by Renal Function (REDUCE BOLUS): A Single-Blind, Stratified Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial

Qiang Hu, Ya-Ling Han, Tie-Nan Zhou, Xiao-Zeng Wang, Quan-Yu Zhang, Qiang Hu, Ya-Ling Han, Tie-Nan Zhou, Xiao-Zeng Wang, Quan-Yu Zhang

Abstract

Background: In clinical practice, some cases indicated that the loading dose of bivalirudin increased the bleeding risk, particularly in patients with renal insufficiency. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the low-dose (80%) bolus injection of bivalirudin in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization stratified by renal function.

Methods: A total of 204 individuals in the REDUCE BOLUS trial were stratified 1:1 to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 ml/min cohort or eGFR < 60 ml/min cohort, then randomized 1:1 to the reduced bolus bivalirudin group (i.e., the experimental group) or normal bolus bivalirudin group (i.e., the control group), respectively. The primary end point was to compare the differences of the area under the curve of activated clotting time (ACT) between the two groups. The secondary end points were the postoperative net adverse clinical events (NACEs) before discharge, defined as the all-cause mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, stroke, and bleeding events.

Results: Between January 3, 2020, and March 26, 2021, 204 patients undergoing coronary angiography were randomly assigned, including 102 (i.e., 51 in the control group and 51 in the experimental group) with normal eGFR and 102 (i.e., 51 control and 51 experimental) with abnormal eGFR. No difference was observed in the curve of ACT between the control group and the experimental group (0.55 ± 0.09 vs. 0.56 ± 0.08, P = 0.542 and 0.55 ± 0.06 vs. 0.57 ± 0.05, P = 0.075, respectively, for normal eGFR cohort and abnormal eGFR cohort). The one-sided 97.5% lower confidence bound for the difference in the area under the ACT curve was -0.017 and 0.0015 in eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min and eGFR<60 ml/min cohort, respectively, both above the preset non-inferiority criterion of -0.07, establishing the non-inferiority. There was no incidence of NACE and stent thrombosis before discharge in each group.

Conclusion: In patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, the efficacy and safety of the reduced bolus of bivalirudin were non-inferior to the normal one, even in patients without chronic kidney disease.

Clinical trial registration: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT03588611].

Keywords: activated clotting time; bivalirudin; bleeding; loading dose; percutaneous coronary intervention.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Hu, Han, Zhou, Wang and Zhang.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of the study.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The activated clotting time (ACT) curve in each group for patients with normal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The ACT curve in each group for patients with abnormal eGFR.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
(A) Time-to-event curves for the net adverse clinical events (NACEs) through 6-month follow-up. (B) Time-to-event curves for the NACE through 6-month follow-up in patients with normal eGFR. (C) Time-to-event curves for the NACE through 6-month follow-up in patients with abnormal eGFR.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Selected subgroup analyses for the 6-month rates of NACE.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
(A) Time-to-event curves for any Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding through 6-month follow-up. (B) Time-to-event curves for any BARC bleeding through 6-month follow-up in patients with normal eGFR. (C) Time-to-event curves for any BARC bleeding through 6-month follow-up in patients with abnormal eGFR.

References

    1. Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi M, Abbasifard M, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. (2020) 396:1204–22. 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30925-9
    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 Esc guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with st-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with st-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (Esc). Eur Heart J. (2018) 39:119–77. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
    1. Han S, Kim YH, Choi HY, Kim MJ, Kim WJ, Park H, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation analysis of Ctb-001, a recently developed generic of bivalirudin. Pharm Res. (2019) 36:146. 10.1007/s11095-019-2676-6
    1. Stone GW, White HD, Ohman EM, Bertrand ME, Lincoff AM, McLaurin BT, et al. Bivalirudin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a subgroup analysis from the acute catheterization and urgent intervention triage strategy (Acuity) trial. Lancet. (2007) 369:907–19. 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60450-4
    1. Steg PG, van ’t Hof A, Hamm CW, Clemmensen P, Lapostolle F, Coste P, et al. Bivalirudin started during emergency transport for primary pci. N Engl J Med. (2013) 369:2207–17. 10.1056/NEJMoa1311096
    1. Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, Peruga JZ, Brodie BR, Dudek D, et al. Bivalirudin during primary Pci in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. (2008) 358:2218–30. 10.1056/NEJMoa0708191
    1. Han Y, Guo J, Zheng Y, Zang H, Su X, Wang Y, et al. Bivalirudin Vs Heparin with or without tirofiban during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: the bright randomized clinical trial. JAMA. (2015) 313:1336–46. 10.1001/jama.2015.2323
    1. Kastrati A, Neumann F-J, Mehilli J, Byrne RA, Iijima R, Büttner HJ, et al. Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. (2008) 359:688–96. 10.1056/NEJMoa0802944
    1. Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, Peruga JZ, Brodie BR, Dudek D, et al. Heparin plus a glycoprotein Iib/Iiia inhibitor versus bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction (Horizons-Ami): final 3-year results from a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). (2011) 377:2193–204. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60764-2
    1. Erlinge D, Omerovic E, Frobert O, Linder R, Danielewicz M, Hamid M, et al. Bivalirudin versus heparin monotherapy in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:1132–42. 10.1056/NEJMoa1706443
    1. Shahzad A, Kemp I, Mars C, Wilson K, Roome C, Cooper R, et al. Unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (Heat-Ppci): an open-label, single centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. (2014) 384:1849–58. 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60924-7
    1. Iijima R, Ndrepepa G, Mehilli J, Byrne RA, Schulz S, Neumann FJ, et al. Profile of bleeding and ischaemic complications with bivalirudin and unfractionated heparin after percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. (2008) 30:290–6. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn586
    1. Fox CS, Muntner P, Chen AY, Alexander KP, Roe MT, Cannon CP, et al. Use of evidence-based therapies in short-term outcomes of St-Segment elevation myocardial infarction and Non-St-Segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease: a report from the national cardiovascular data acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network registry. Circulation. (2010) 121:357–65. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.865352
    1. Zeng X, Lincoff AM, Schulz-Schupke S, Steg PG, Elbez Y, Mehran R, et al. Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in coronary artery disease patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease: meta-analysis. J Cardiol. (2018) 71:494–504. 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.10.018
    1. Hanna EB, Chen AY, Roe MT, Wiviott SD, Fox CS, Saucedo JF. Characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients with Non-St-Segment elevation myocardial infarction and chronic kidney disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. (2011) 4:1002–8. 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.05.022
    1. Franczyk-Skora B, Gluba A, Banach M, Rysz J. Treatment of Non-St-Elevation myocardial infarction and St-Elevation myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease. Arch Med Sci. (2013) 9:1019–27. 10.5114/aoms.2013.39792
    1. Saltzman AJ, Stone GW, Claessen BE, Narula A, Leon-Reyes S, Weisz G, et al. Long-Term impact of chronic kidney disease in patients with St-Segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the horizons-ami (Harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. (2011) 4:1011–9. 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.06.012
    1. Kiser TH, Fish DN. Evaluation of bivalirudin treatment for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients with hepatic and/or renal dysfunction. Pharmacotherapy. (2006) 26:452–60.
    1. Robson R. The use of bivalirudin in patients with renal impairment. J Invasive Cardiol. (2000) 12(Suppl F):33F–336F.
    1. Chew DP, Lincoff AM, Gurm H, Wolski K, Cohen DJ, Henry T, et al. Bivalirudin versus heparin and glycoprotein Iib/Iiia inhibition among patients with renal impairment undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (a Subanalysis of the Replace-2 Trial). Am J Cardiol. (2005) 95:581–5. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.11.003
    1. Basra SS, Tsai P, Lakkis NM. Safety and efficacy of antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients with chronic kidney disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2011) 58:2263–9. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.051
    1. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 Esc guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. (2020) 41:407–77. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425
    1. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the bleeding academic research consortium. Circulation. (2011) 123:2736–47. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449
    1. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. (2007) 115:2344–51. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313
    1. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR, et al. 2014 Aha/Acc guideline for the management of patients with non–St-Elevation acute coronary syndromes. J Am College Cardiol. (2014) 64:e139–228. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017
    1. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, et al. 2013 Accf/Aha guideline for the management of St-Elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary. Circulation. (2013) 127:529–55. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742c84
    1. Dillinger J-G, Ducrocq G, Elbez Y, Cohen M, Bode C, Pollack C, et al. Activated clotting time to guide heparin dosing in Non–St-Segment–Elevation acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with Iib/Iiia inhibitors. Circulat Cardiovasc Intervent. (2018) 11:e006084. 10.1161/circinterventions.118.006084
    1. Ducrocq G, Jolly S, Mehta SR, Rao SV, Patel T, Moreno R, et al. Activated clotting time and outcomes during percutaneous coronary intervention for Non-St-Segment-Elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the Futura/Oasis-8 trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. (2015) 8:e002044. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002044
    1. Louis DW, Kennedy K, Lima FV, Pancholy SB, Abbott JD, Gordon P, et al. Association between maximal activated clotting time and major bleeding complications during transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. (2018) 11:1036–45. 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.257
    1. Cheneau E, Canos D, Kuchulakanti PK, Rha SW, Satler LF, Suddath WO, et al. Value of monitoring activated clotting time when bivalirudin is used as the sole anticoagulation agent for percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. (2004) 94:789–92. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.05.068
    1. Weeks PA, Alkhateeb HM, Michaud SE, Diez JG. Evaluation of bivalirudin hyper- and hypo-act responses in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. (2013) 25:250–3.
    1. Valgimigli M, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Vranckx P, Rothenbühler M, Tebaldi M, et al. Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (Matrix): final 1-Year results of a multicentre. Randomised Controlled Trial. Lancet. (2018) 392:835–48. 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31714-8
    1. Schulz S, Mehilli J, Ndrepepa G, Neumann FJ, Birkmeier KA, Kufner S, et al. Bivalirudin Vs. Unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris: 1-Year results of the isar-react 3 trial. Eur Heart J. (2010) 31:582–7. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq008
    1. Eikelboom JW, Mehta SR, Anand SS, Xie C, Fox KA, Yusuf S. Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. (2006) 114:774–82. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.612812
    1. Segev A, Strauss BH, Tan M, Constance C, Langer A, Goodman SG, et al. Predictors and 1-Year outcome of major bleeding in patients with Non-St-Elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from the canadian acute coronary syndrome registries. Am Heart J. (2005) 150:690–4. 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.11.012
    1. Kinnaird TD, Stabile E, Mintz GS, Lee CW, Canos DA, Gevorkian N, et al. Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol. (2003) 92:930–5.
    1. Manoukian SV, Feit F, Mehran R, Voeltz MD, Ebrahimi R, Hamon M, et al. Impact of major bleeding on 30-Day mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the acuity trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2007) 49:1362–8. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.027
    1. Venetsanos D, Lawesson SS, James S, Koul S, Erlinge D, Swahn E, et al. Bivalirudin versus heparin with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. (2018) 201:9–16. 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.03.014
    1. Reddan D, Szczech LA, O’Shea S, Califf RM. Anticoagulation in acute cardiac care in patients with chronic kidney disease. Am Heart J. (2003) 145:586–94. 10.1067/mhj.2003.168
    1. Mehran R, Nikolsky E, Lansky AJ, Kirtane AJ, Kim YH, Feit F, et al. Impact of chronic kidney disease on early (30-Day) and Late (1-Year) outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with alternative antithrombotic treatment strategies: an acuity (Acute catheterization and urgent intervention triage strategy) substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. (2009) 2:748–57. 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.018
    1. Chew DP, Lincoff AM, Gurm H, Wolski K, Cohen DJ, Henry T, et al. Bivalirudin versus heparin and glycoprotein Iib/Iiia inhibition among patients with renal impairment undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (a Subanalysis of the Replace-2 Trial). Am J Cardiol. (2005) 95:581–5.
    1. Washam JB, Kaltenbach LA, Wojdyla DM, Patel MR, Klein AJ, Abbott JD, et al. Anticoagulant use among patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis from the national cardiovascular data registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. (2018) 11:e005628. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005628
    1. Valgimigli M, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Rothenbuhler M, Gagnor A, Calabro P, et al. Bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. (2015) 373:997–1009. 10.1056/NEJMoa1507854

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera