Effects of intraoperative individualized PEEP on postoperative atelectasis in obese patients: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial

Chen Zhu, Jing-Wen Yao, Li-Xin An, Ya-Fan Bai, Wen-Jing Li, Chen Zhu, Jing-Wen Yao, Li-Xin An, Ya-Fan Bai, Wen-Jing Li

Abstract

Background: Obese patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation during laparoscopic abdominal surgery commonly have a higher incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), due to factors such as decreasing oxygen reserve, declining functional residual capacity, and reducing lung compliance. Pulmonary atelectasis caused by pneumoperitoneum and mechanical ventilation is further aggravated in obese patients. Recent studies demonstrated that individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (iPEEP) was one of effective lung-protective ventilation strategies. However, there is still no exact method to determine the best iPEEP, especially for obese patients. Here, we will use the best static lung compliance (Cstat) method to determine iPEEP, compared with regular PEEP, by observing the atelectasis area measured by electrical impedance tomography (EIT), and try to prove a better iPEEP setting method for obese patients.

Methods: This study is a single-center, two-arm, prospective, randomized control trial. A total number of 80 obese patients with body mass index ≥ 32.5 kg/m2 scheduled for laparoscopic gastric volume reduction and at medium to high risk for PPCs will be enrolled. They will be randomly assigned to control group (PEEP5 group) and iPEEP group. A PEEP of 5 cmH2O will be used in PEEP5 group, whereas an individualized PEEP value determined by a Cstat-directed PEEP titration procedure will be applied in the iPEEP group. Standard lung-protective ventilation methods such as low tidal volumes (7 ml/kg, predicted body weight, PBW), a fraction of inspired oxygen ≥ 0.5, and recruitment maneuvers (RM) will be applied during and after operation in both groups. Primary endpoints will be postoperative atelectasis measured by chest electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and intraoperative oxygen index. Secondary endpoints will be serum IL-6, TNF-α, procalcitonin (PCT) kinetics during and after surgery, incidence of PPCs, organ dysfunction, length of in-hospital stay, and hospital expense.

Discussion: Although there are several studies about the effect of iPEEP titration on perioperative PPCs in obese patients recently, the iPEEP setting method they used was complex and was not always feasible in routine clinical practice. This trial will assess a possible simple method to determine individualized optimal PEEP in obese patients and try to demonstrate that individualized PEEP with lung-protective ventilation methods is necessary for obese patients undergoing general surgery. The results of this trial will support anesthesiologist a feasible Cstat-directed PEEP titration method during anesthesia for obese patients in attempt to prevent PPCs.

Trial registration: www.chictr.org.cn ChiCTR1900026466. Registered on 11 October 2019.

Keywords: Atelectasis; Cstat; Electrical impedance tomography; Individualized PEEP; Obesity.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram for this trail. PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; iPEEP, individual PEEP, COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ICU, intensive care unit; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, PaO2, partial pressure of arterial oxygen, FiO2, inspiratory fraction of inspired oxygen, EIT, electrical impedance tomography, PPCs, postoperative pulmonary complications, PCT, procalcitonin
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The ventilator-driven alveolar recruitment maneuver protocol. Ppeak, peak airway pressure; Pplat, plateau airway pressure; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; VT, tidal volume normalized for adjusted body weight; I:E, ratio between inspiratory and expiratory time; RR, respiratory rate
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Individualized PEEP and perioperative management process. PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; iPEEP, individualized positive end-expiratory pressure; RM, the ventilator-driven alveolar recruitment maneuver; PEEP5, PEEP is 5 cmH2O
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Individualized PEEP titrated by optimal Cstat. Cstat, static lung compliance; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; iPEEP, individualized positive end-expiratory pressure; RM, the ventilator-driven alveolar recruitment maneuver; PEEP5, PEEP is 5 cmH2O
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Standard protocol items: time schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments. PEEP, positive end-expiratory airway pressure; iPEEP, individual PEEP; RM, recruitment maneuver; EIT, electrical impedance tomography; PNP, pneumoperitoneum; PCT, serum procalcitonin; PPCs, postoperative pulmonary complications; POD, postoperative day; ICU, intensive care unit

References

    1. Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, et al. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(6):1338–1350. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc6e0a.
    1. Fernandez-Bustamante A, Frendl G, Sprung J, et al. Postoperative pulmonary complications, early mortality, and hospital stay following noncardiothoracic surgery: a multicenter study by the perioperative research network investigators. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:157e66.
    1. Weiser TG, Makary MA, Haynes AB, Dziekan G, Berry WR, Gawande AA. Standardised metrics for global surgical surveillance. Lancet. 2009;374:1113–1117. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61161-2.
    1. Young CC, Harris EM, Vacchiano C, et al. Lung-protective ventilation for the surgical patient: international expert panel-basedconsensus recommendations. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(6):898–913. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.017.
    1. Mazo V, Sabate S, Canet J, et al. Prospective external validation of a predictive score for postoperative pulmonary complications. Anesthesiology. 2014;121:219–231. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000334.
    1. Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, Beiderlinden M, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Futier E, et al. Incidence of mortality and morbidity related to postoperative lung injury in patients who have undergone abdominal or thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(12):1007–1015. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70228-0.
    1. Canet J, Sabaté S, Mazo V, Gallart L, et al. Development and validation of a score to predict postoperative respiratory failure in a multicentre European cohort: a prospective, observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32:458–470. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000223.
    1. Ball L, Hemmes SNT, Serpa Neto A, et al. Intraoperative ventilation settings and their associations with postoperative pulmonary complications in obese patients. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121(4):899–908. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.021.
    1. Pelosi P, Gregoretti C. Perioperative management of obese patients. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2010;24(2):211–225. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2010.02.001.
    1. Pereira SM, Tucci MR, Morais CCA, et al. Individual positive end-expiratory pressure settings optimize intraoperative mechanical ventilation and reduced postoperative atelectasis. Anesthesiology. 2018;129(6):1070–1081. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002435.
    1. Nestler C, Simon P, Petroff D, et al. Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients during general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled clinical trial using electrical impedance tomography. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(6):1194–1205. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex192.
    1. Eichler L, Truskowska K, Dupree A, et al. Intraoperative ventilation of morbidly obese patients guided by transpulmonary pressure. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):122–129. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2794-3.
    1. Carron M. Positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients during general anaesthesia. The role of intra-abdominal pressure. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(2):409–410. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.013.
    1. Ruszkai Z, Kiss E, László I, et al. Effects of intraoperative PEEP optimization on postoperative pulmonary complications and the inflammatory response: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18(1):375–384. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2116-z.
    1. Minami E, Ito S, Sugiura T, et al. Markedly elevated procalcitonin in early postoperative period in pediatric open heart surgery: a prospective cohort study. J Intensive Care. 2014;2(1):38–42. doi: 10.1186/2052-0492-2-38.
    1. Bluth T, Teichmann R, Kiss T, et al. Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18(1):202–224. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1929-0.
    1. Lim JU, Lee JH, Kim JS, Hwang YI, Kim TH, Lim SY, Yoo KH, Jung KS, Kim YK, Rhee CK. Comparison of World Health Organization and Asia-Pacific body mass index classifications in COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017;21(12):2465–2475. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S141295.
    1. Güldner A, Kiss T, Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SN, Canet J, Spieth PM, Rocco PR, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M. Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications: a comprehensive review of the role of tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, and lung recruitment maneuvers. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(3):692–713. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000754.
    1. Hales CM, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, et al. Differences in obesity prevalence by demographic characteristics and urbanization level among adults in the United States, 2013-2016. JAMA. 2018;319(23):2419–2429. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7270.
    1. Littleton SW, Tulaimat A. The effects of obesity on lung volumes and oxygenation. Respir Med. 2017;124:15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.01.004.
    1. Dixon AE, Peters U. The effect of obesity on lung function. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2018;12(9):755–767. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2018.1506331.
    1. Zewari S, Vos P, van den Elshout F, et al. Obesity in COPD: revealed and unrevealed issues. COPD. 2017;14(6):663–673. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2017.1383978.
    1. Hedenstierna G, Tokics L, Scaramuzzo G, et al. Oxygenation impairment during anesthesia: influence of age and body weight. Anesthesiology. 2019;131(1):46–57. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002693.
    1. Pfurtscheller K, Ring S, Beran E, et al. Effect of body position on ventilation distribution during PEEP titration in a porcine model of acute lung injury using advanced respiratory monitoring and electrical impedance tomography. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2015;3(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40635-014-0038-6.
    1. Pirrone M, Fisher D, Chipman D, et al. Recruitment maneuvers and positive end-expiratory pressure titration in morbidly obese ICU patients. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(2):300–307. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001387.
    1. De Jong A, Chanques G, Jaber S. Mechanical ventilation in obese ICU patients: from intubation to extubation. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1641-1.
    1. Xie J, Jin F, Pan C, et al. The effects of low tidal ventilation on lung strain correlate with pulmonary compliance. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1600-x.
    1. He X, Jiang J, Liu Y, et al. Electrical impedance tomography-guided PEEP titration in patients undergoing laparoseopic abdominal surgery. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95(14):e3306. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003306.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera