A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments

Diana E Bowler, Lisette M Buyung-Ali, Teri M Knight, Andrew S Pullin, Diana E Bowler, Lisette M Buyung-Ali, Teri M Knight, Andrew S Pullin

Abstract

Background: There is increasing interest in the potential role of the natural environment in human health and well-being. However, the evidence-base for specific and direct health or well-being benefits of activity within natural compared to more synthetic environments has not been systematically assessed.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review to collate and synthesise the findings of studies that compare measurements of health or well-being in natural and synthetic environments. Effect sizes of the differences between environments were calculated and meta-analysis used to synthesise data from studies measuring similar outcomes.

Results: Twenty-five studies met the review inclusion criteria. Most of these studies were crossover or controlled trials that investigated the effects of short-term exposure to each environment during a walk or run. This included 'natural' environments, such as public parks and green university campuses, and synthetic environments, such as indoor and outdoor built environments. The most common outcome measures were scores of different self-reported emotions. Based on these data, a meta-analysis provided some evidence of a positive benefit of a walk or run in a natural environment in comparison to a synthetic environment. There was also some support for greater attention after exposure to a natural environment but not after adjusting effect sizes for pretest differences. Meta-analysis of data on blood pressure and cortisol concentrations found less evidence of a consistent difference between environments across studies.

Conclusions: Overall, the studies are suggestive that natural environments may have direct and positive impacts on well-being, but support the need for investment in further research on this question to understand the general significance for public health.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The number of studies that measured health or well-being data within different categories (total number of studies = 25). 'Emotions' included self-reported emotions based on questionnaire scores; 'Attention' included tests of attention (e.g. Digit Span test) and symptoms of ADD/ADHD; 'Cardiovascular' included blood pressure and pulse; 'Endrocrine' included measurements of hormone concentrations; 'Immune function' included measurements of factors involved in immune function and 'Others' are detailed within the text.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The pooled (weighted average) effect sizes (Hedges g) and 95% CI for each outcome. The sign of the effect size reflects the benefit on health (positive effects indicate greater attention, energy and tranquillity but lower values for the other outcomes). In brackets are shown the number of studies that was used to calculate the effect size and an asterisk is used to denote significant heterogeneity (p < 0.05) within a particular group.

References

    1. Miles I, Sullivan WC, Kuo FE. Ecological restoration volunteers: the benefits of participation. Urban Ecosystems. 1998;2:27–41. doi: 10.1023/A:1009501515335.
    1. Maller C, Townsend M, Pryor A, Brown P, St Leger L. Healthy nature healthy people: 'contact with nature' as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promot Int. 2006;21:45–54. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dai032.
    1. Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kazmierczak A, Niemela J, James P. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review. Landsc Urban Plann. 2007;81:167–178. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001.
    1. Kaczynski AT, Henderson KA. Environmental correlates of physical activity: A review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leisure Sciences. 2007;29:315–354. doi: 10.1080/01490400701394865.
    1. Pretty J, Peacock J, Hine R, Sellens M, South N, Griffin M. Green exercise in the UK countryside: Effects on health and psychological well-being, and implications for policy and planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2007;50:211–231. doi: 10.1080/09640560601156466.
    1. Bauman AE. Updating the evidence that physical activity is good for health: an epidemiological review 2000-2003. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7:6–19. doi: 10.1016/S1440-2440(04)80273-1.
    1. Brown WJ, Burton NW, Rowan PJ. Updating the evidence on physical activity and health in women. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:404–411. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.029.
    1. Blair SN, Morris JN. Healthy hearts - and the universal benefits of being physically active: physical activity and health. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19:253–256. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.01.019.
    1. Berger BG, Motl RW. Exercise and mood: a selective review and synthesis of research employing the Profile of Mood States. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2000;12:69–92. doi: 10.1080/10413200008404214.
    1. Street G, James R, Cutt H. The relationship between organised physical recreation and mental health. Health Promot J Austr. 2007;18:236–239.
    1. Rethorst CD, Wipfli BM, Landers DM. The antidepressive effects of exercise: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Sports Med. 2009;39:491–511. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200939060-00004.
    1. Barton J, Pretty J. What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:3947–3955. doi: 10.1021/es903183r.
    1. Kaplan R, Kaplan S. The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York, Cambridge University Press; 1989.
    1. Kaplan S. The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol. 1995;15:169–182. doi: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2.
    1. Ulrich RS. In: Behavior and the natural environment. Altman I, Wohlwill JF, editor. New York, Plenum Press; 1983. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment; pp. 85–125.
    1. Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, de Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P. Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:587–592. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.043125.
    1. Mitchell R, Popham F. Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. The Lancet. 2008;372:1655–1660. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61689-X.
    1. Frumkin H. Beyond toxicity: Human health and the natural environment. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20:234–240. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00317-2.
    1. Brown T, Bell M. Off the couch and on the move: Global public health and the medicalisation of nature. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1343–1354. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.020.
    1. Nature and Health. The influence of nature on social, psychological and physical well-being. The Hague; 2004. Health Council of the Netherlands and Dutch Advisory Council for Research on Spatial Planning, Nature and the Environment.
    1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM. The need for evidence-based medicine. J R Soc Med. 1995;88:620–624.
    1. Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G. Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine. London, Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd; 2003.
    1. Pullin AS, Knight TM. Effectiveness in conservation practice: pointers from medicine and public health. Conserv Biol. 2001;15:50–54.
    1. Pullin AS, Stewart GB. Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol. 2006;20:1647–1656. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x.
    1. Thomas BH, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Micucci S. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1:176–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04006.x.
    1. Telles S, Srinivas RB. Autonomic and respiratory measures in children with impaired vision following yoga and physical activity programs. International Journal of Rehabilitation & Health. 1998;4:117–122.
    1. Cuvo AJ, May ME, Post TM. Effects of living room, Snoezelen room, and outdoor activities on stereotypic behavior and engagement by adults with profound mental retardation. Res Dev Disabil. 2001;22:183–204. doi: 10.1016/S0891-4222(01)00067-1.
    1. Isaacs AJ, Critchley JA, See Tai S, Buckingham K, Westley D, Harridge SDR, Smith C, Gottlieb JM. Exercise Evaluation Randomised Trial (EXERT): a randomised trial comparing GP referral for leisure centre-based exercise, community based walking and advice only. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11:10.
    1. Scholz U, Krombholz H. A study of the physical performance ability of children from wood kindergartens and from regular kindergartens. Motorik Mar. 2007;1:17–22.
    1. Park BJ, Tsunetsugu Y, Kasetani T, Hirano H, Kagawa T, Sato M, Miyazaki Y. Physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the atmosphere of the forest)--using salivary cortisol and cerebral activity as indicators. J Physiol Anthropol. 2007;26:123–128. doi: 10.2114/jpa2.26.123.
    1. Tsunetsugu Y, Park BJ, Ishii H, Hirano H, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y. Physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the atmosphere of the forest) in an old-growth broadleaf forest in Yamagata Prefecture, Japan. J Physiol Anthropol. 2007;26:135–142. doi: 10.2114/jpa2.26.135.
    1. Hartig T, Mang M, Evans GW. Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environ Behav. 1991;23:3–26. doi: 10.1177/0013916591231001.
    1. Peacock J, Hine R, Pretty J. The mental health benefits of green exercise activities and green care. Report for MIND; 2007.
    1. Faber Taylor A, Kuo FE. Children with attention deficits concentrate better after walk in the park. J Atten Disord. 2009;12:402–409. doi: 10.1177/1087054708323000.
    1. Hartig T, Evans GW, Jamner LD, Davis DS, Gärling T. Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J Environ Psychol. 2003;23:109–123. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3.
    1. Li Q, Morimoto K, Kobayashi M, Inagaki H, Katsumata M, Hirata Y, Hirata K, Suzuki H, Li YJ, Wakayama Y, Kawada T, Park BJ, Ohira T, Matsui N, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y, Krensky AM. Visiting a forest, but not a city, increases human natural killer activity and expression of anti-cancer proteins. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2008;21:117–127.
    1. Plante TG, Cage C, Clements S, Stover A. Psychological Benefits of Exercise Paired With Virtual Reality: Outdoor Exercise Energizes Whereas Indoor Virtual Exercise Relaxes. Int J Stress Manag. 2006;13:108–117. doi: 10.1037/1072-5245.13.1.108.
    1. Plante TG, Gores C, Brecht C, Carrow J, Imbs A, Willemsen E. Does Exercise Environment Enhance the Psychological Benefits of Exercise for Women? Int J Stress Manag. 2007;14:88–98. doi: 10.1037/1072-5245.14.1.88.
    1. Teas J, Hurley T, Ghumare S, Ogoussan K. Walking outside improves mood for healthy postmenopausal women. Clin Med Oncol. 2007;1:35–43.
    1. Yamaguchi M, Deguchi M, Miyazaki Y. The effects of exercise in forest and urban environments on sympathetic nervous activity of normal young adults. J Int Med Res. 2006;34:152–159.
    1. Berman MG, Jonides J, Kaplan S. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science. 2008;19:1207–1212. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x.
    1. Bodin M, Hartig T. Does the outdoor environment matter for psychological restoration gained through running? Psychol Sport Exerc. 2003;4:141–153. doi: 10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00038-3.
    1. Butryn TM, Furst DM. The effects of park and urban settings on the moods and cognitive strategies of female runners. Journal of Sport Behavior. 2003;4:335–355.
    1. Kerr JH, Fujiyama H, Sugano A, Okamura T, Chang M, Onouha F. Psychological responses to exercising in laboratory and natural environments. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2006;7:345–359. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2005.09.002.
    1. Harte JL, Eifert GH. The effects of running, environment, and attentional focus on athletes' catecholamine and cortisol levels and mood. Psychophysiology. 1995;32:49–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb03405.x.
    1. Hull RB, Michael SE. Nature-Based Recreation, Mood Change, and Stress Restoration. Leisure Sciences. 1995;17:1–14. doi: 10.1080/01490409509513239.
    1. Hartig T, Nyberg L, Nilsson L-G, Gärling T. Testing for mood congruent recall with environmentally induced mood. J Environ Psychol. 1999;19:353–367. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1999.0142.
    1. Faber Taylor A, Kuo FE, Sullivan WC. Coping with ADD: the surprising connection to green play setting. Environ Behav. 2001;33:54–77. doi: 10.1177/00139160121972864.
    1. Kuo FE, Faber Taylor A. A potential natural treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: evidence from a national study. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1580–1586. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.94.9.1580.
    1. Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett. 2007;3:390–394. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149.
    1. Pretty J. How nature contributes to mental and physical health. Spirituality and Health International. 2004;5:68–78. doi: 10.1002/shi.220.
    1. Ulrich R. Natural vs. urban scenes: some psychophysiological effects. Environ Behav. 1981;13:523–556. doi: 10.1177/0013916581135001.
    1. Laumann K, Gärling T, Stormark KM. Selective attention and heart rate responses to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol. 2003;23:125–134. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00110-X.
    1. Gill B, Simeoni E. Residents' perceptions of an environmental enhancement project in Australia. Health Promot Int. 1995;10:253–259. doi: 10.1093/heapro/10.4.253.
    1. Korpela KM, Hartig T, Kaiser FG, Fuhrer U. Restorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places. Environ Behav. 2001;33:572–589. doi: 10.1177/00139160121973133.
    1. Hillsdon M, Panter J, Foster C, Jones A. The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity. Public Health. 2006;120:1127–1132. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.10.007.
    1. Hartig T. Green space, psychological restoration, and health inequalities. The Lancet. 2008;372:1614–1615. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61669-4.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera