Engaging Experts and Patients to Refine the Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument

Heather D Gibbs, Susan Harvey, Sarah Owens, Diane Boyle, Debra K Sullivan, Heather D Gibbs, Susan Harvey, Sarah Owens, Diane Boyle, Debra K Sullivan

Abstract

Background: An objective measure of nutrition literacy is unavailable for use in the primary care population. The Nutrition Literacy Assessment instrument (NLit) is a tool designed to measure nutrition literacy across six domains and has been previously piloted in breast cancer and parent populations. The purpose of this research was to engage nutrition experts and patients to guide revisions of the NLit for use in adult primary care.

Methods: Experts (n=5) reviewed each item in the NLit using a survey to assign rankings of their agreement according to relevance, clarity, and reading difficulty. Relevance rankings were used to calculate Scale Content Validity Index. After suggested revisions were made, patients (n=12) were recruited from urban primary care clinics of a University Medical Center located in the Midwestern United States and were interviewed by trained researchers using the cognitive interview approach to generate thoughts, feelings, and ideas regarding NLit items. Data analysis involved qualitative and quantitative methods.

Results: Content validity from expert review was confirmed with a total Scale Content Validity Index of 0.90. Themes emerging from the cognitive interviews resulted in changes in the NLit to improve instrument clarity.

Conclusion: These data suggest the NLit achieves its target constructs, is understood by the target audience, and is ready to undergo validity and reliability testing within the primary care population.

Keywords: chronic disease; health literacy; nutrition education; nutrition literacy; patient education; portion size; surveys and questionnaires.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Development of the Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument (NLit) a. b Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument in Breast Cancer; c Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument in Parents

References

    1. Neilson-Bowman L. Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press; 2004.
    1. Kutner M, Greenburg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C. The health literacy of America’s adults: results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. NCES 2006-483. Washington, D. C: National Center for Education Statistics; 2006. .
    1. National Action Plan to Improve Health Literacy Services USDoHaH.2010.. Accessed 15 July 2016.
    1. Franz MJ, Monk A, Barry B, McCLAIN K, Weaver T, Cooper N, Upham P, Bergenstal R, Mazze RS. Effectiveness of medical nutrition therapy provided by dietitians in the management of non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995;95:1009–1017. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00276-6.
    1. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, Appel LJ, Bray GA, Harsha D, Obarzanek E, Conlin PR, Miller ER, Simons-Morton DG. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) diet. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:3–10. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101043440101.
    1. Delahanty LM, Sonnenberg LM, Hayden D, Nathan DM. Clinical and cost outcomes of medical nutrition therapy for hypercholesterolemia: a controlled trial. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101:1012. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00250-4.
    1. Pruitt JD, Bensimhon D, Kraus WE. Nutrition as a contributor and treatment option for overweight and obesity. Am Heart J. 2006;151:628. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.03.004.
    1. Food & Health Survey: Consumer Attitudes toward Food Safety, Nutrition and Health Foundation IFIC. 2012. . Accessed 15 July 2016.
    1. Cowburn G, Stockley L. Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8:21–28. doi: 10.1079/PHN2005666.
    1. Levy AS, Fein SB. Consumers’ ability to perform tasks using nutrition labels. J Nutr Educ. 1998;30:210–217. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3182(98)70321-8.
    1. Rothman RL, Housam R, Weiss H, Davis D, Gregory R, Gebretsadik T, Shintani A, Elasy TA. Patient understanding of food labels: the role of literacy and numeracy. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31:391–398. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.025.
    1. Sinclair S, Hammond D, Goodman S. Sociodemographic differences in the comprehension of nutritional labels on food products. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013;45:767–772. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2013.04.262.
    1. Viswanathan M, Hastak M, Gau R. Understanding and facilitating the usage of nutritional labels by low-literate consumers. J Public Policy Mark. 2009;28:135–145. doi: 10.1509/jppm.28.2.135.
    1. Gibbs H, Chapman-Novakofski K. Establishing content validity for the nutrition literacy assessment instrument. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E109. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120267.
    1. Parker RM, Baker DW, Williams MV, Nurss JR. The test of functional health literacy in adults. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:537–541. doi: 10.1007/BF02640361.
    1. Baker DW, Williams MV, Parker RM, Gazmararian JA, Nurss J. Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;38:33–42. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00116-5.
    1. Weiss BD, Mays MZ, Martz W, Castro KM, DeWalt DA, Pignone MP, Mockbee J, Hale FA. Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:514–522. doi: 10.1370/afm.405.
    1. Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Mayeaux E, George RB, Murphy PW, Crouch MA. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med. 1993;25:391.
    1. Gibbs H, Chapman-Novakofski K. Exploring nutrition literacy: attention to assessment and the skills clients need. Health (N Y) 2012;4:120–124.
    1. Gibbs HD, Ellerbeck EF, Befort C, Gajewski B, Kennett AR, Yu Q, Christifano D, Sullivan DK. Measuring nutrition literacy in breast cancer patients: development of a novel instrument. J Cancer Educ. 2016;31:493–499. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0851-y.
    1. Gibbs HD KA, Kerling EH, Yu Q, Gajewski B, Ptomey LT, Sullivan DK. Assessing the nutrition literacy of parents and its relationship with diet quality. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016;48:505-509.e1.
    1. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 3. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2012.
    1. Taylor WL. " cloze" readability scores as indices of individual differences in comprehension and aptitude. J Appl Psychol. 1957;41:19. doi: 10.1037/h0040591.
    1. MyPlate: USDA Food Guidance System Promotion USDoACfNP. 2011. . Accessed 15 July 2016.
    1. American Dietetic Association . Choose your foods: exchange lists for diabetes. Chicago: American Dietetic Association; 2008.
    1. Rubio DMG, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee ES, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: conducting a content validity study in social work research. Soc Work Res. 2003;27:94–104. doi: 10.1093/swr/27.2.94.
    1. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29:489–497. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
    1. GB. W: Cognitive interviewing and questionnaire design: A training manual., Working Paper Series, No. 7. edn. Hyattsville, MD; 1994.
    1. Christodoulou C, Junghaenel DU, DeWalt DA, Rothrock N, Stone AA. Cognitive interviewing in the evaluation of fatigue items: results from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) Qual Life Res. 2008;17:1239–1246. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9402-x.
    1. Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2004.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
    1. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newberry Park: Sage; 1990. p. 41. .
    1. Denzin NK. The research act: a theoretical orientation to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
    1. Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Després J-P, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2010;121:1356–1364. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876185.
    1. Slawson DL, Eck LH. Intense practice enhances accuracy of portion size estimation of amorphous foods. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997;97:295–297. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(97)00076-X.
    1. Lambert L, Pattison DJ, De Looy AE. Dietetic students’ performance of activities in an objective structured clinical examination. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010;23:224–229. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01076.x.
    1. Group DPPR The diabetes prevention program (DPP) description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:2165–2171. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2165.
    1. Labeling N. Education act of 1990. Public Law. 1990;101:104.
    1. Thompson TG, Veneman AM: Dietary guidelines for Americans 2005. United States Department of Health and Human Services and United States Department of Agriculture. 2005.
    1. Lung NH, Institute B: Your guide to lowering your blood pressure with DASH. NIH publication. 2006.
    1. Willis GB: Cognitive interviewing: a “how to” guide. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute. 1999.
    1. Carbone ET, Campbell MK, Honess-Morreale L. Use of cognitive interview techniques in the development of nutrition surveys and interactive nutrition messages for low-income populations. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:690–696. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90156-2.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera