Clinical Bioequivalence of Wixela Inhub and Advair Diskus in Adults With Asthma

Dik Ng, Edward M Kerwin, Martha V White, S David Miller, Scott Haughie, Jonathan K Ward, Richard Allan, Dik Ng, Edward M Kerwin, Martha V White, S David Miller, Scott Haughie, Jonathan K Ward, Richard Allan

Abstract

Background: Wixela® Inhub® is a dry powder inhaler approved as a generic equivalent to Advair® Diskus® (fluticasone propionate [FP]/salmeterol fixed-dose combination) for patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed at confirming the local (lung) therapeutic equivalence of both the FP and salmeterol components of Wixela Inhub (test [T]) to Advair Diskus (reference [R]) after inhalation. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in patients ≥18 years with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma compared the local therapeutic equivalence (using forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]) of FP/salmeterol (100/50 μg) after inhaled delivery via T and R. Results: Randomized patients (N = 1127) received T (n = 512), R (n = 512), or placebo (n = 103). T and R significantly increased day 1 FEV1 area under the effect curve over 12 hours of the change from baseline (AUC[0-12]) and day 29 trough FEV1 over placebo, indicating that these endpoints were sufficiently sensitive for evaluation of bioequivalence. On day 1, T and R each increased FEV1 AUC(0-12) over placebo (3.134 L•h [T], 2.677 L•h [R]; each p < 0.0001). Following twice-daily dosing for 28 days, T and R also each increased trough FEV1 (measured on day 29) over placebo (235 mL [T], 215 mL [R]; each p < 0.0001). Least-squares mean T/R ratios (90% confidence intervals) for day 1 FEV1 AUC(0-12) and day 29 trough FEV1 were 1.120 (1.016-1.237) and 1.069 (0.938-1.220), respectively, indicating that T and R were bioequivalent for both co-primary endpoints. FP/salmeterol was well tolerated when administered via either T or R. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that the therapeutic effects of Wixela Inhub are bioequivalent to Advair Diskus in the lung. Wixela Inhub represents a therapeutically equivalent new FP/salmeterol treatment option for use in the treatment of asthma and COPD.

Keywords: Advair Diskus; Wixela Inhub; fluticasone propionate; generic drugs; local bioequivalence; salmeterol.

Conflict of interest statement

D.N., S.H., J.K.W., and R.A. are employees of Mylan and have stock ownership in Mylan.

E.M.K. has participated in consulting, advisory boards, speaker panels, or received travel reimbursement for Amphastar, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Mylan, Novartis, Oriel, Pearl, Sunovion, Teva, and Theravance. He has conducted multicenter clinical research trials for ∼40 pharmaceutical companies.

M.V.W. reports grants from Mylan, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Mylan; grants from Sanofi-Aventis; and grants from Genentech, outside the submitted work.

S.D.M. has no disclosures to declare.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Patient flow. One of the patients randomized to the reference product (Advair Diskus) was not treated because of a failure to meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria, which resulted in 512 patients treated with Advair Diskus and 1127 total treated patients. All 1127 patients receiving a study treatment (Wixela Inhub [T], Advair Diskus [R], or placebo) were analyzed for safety. The FAS consisted of 1122 patients (509 [R], 511 [T], and 102 [placebo]); 5 treated patients (3 [T], 1 [R], and 1 [placebo]) were excluded from the FAS due to being enrolled into the study twice and so the second participations were excluded from the FAS. The PPS consisted of 1105 patients (502 [T and R], 101 [placebo]); 17 patients (7 [T], 9 [R], and 1 [placebo]) were excluded from the PPS due to ≥1 significant protocol deviation. FAS, full analysis set; PPS, per protocol set; R, reference product (Advair Diskus); T, test product (Wixela Inhub).
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Change from baseline in FEV1 over time on day 1 with placebo (open squares), test (open circles), and reference (open triangles) FPS. Test FPS, Wixela Inhub; reference FPS, Advair Diskus. Data are mean and 95% CI. CI, confidence interval; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second. FPS, fluticasone propionate/salmeterol.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Day 1 (A) and day 29 (B) improvement in lung function after treatment with test and reference FPS and placebo. Baseline-subtracted data presented as LS mean and 95% CI. Test, Wixela Inhub; Reference, Advair Diskus. *Difference from placebo p < 0.0001. AUC(0–12), area under the effect curve over 12 hours; LS, least squares.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Day 1 and day 29 bioequivalence test. T/R FEV1 LS mean ratio and 90% CI for both day 1 (FEV1 AUC(0–12)) and day 29 (trough FEV1) co-primary endpoints were within the standard bioequivalence limits, shown as dotted lines. AUC(0–12), area under the effect curve over 12 hours postdose; R, reference product (Advair Diskus); T, test product (Wixela Inhub).

References

    1. Yawn BP, Raphiou I, Hurley JS, and Dalal AA: The role of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination therapy in preventing exacerbations of COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2010;5:165–178
    1. McKeage K, and Keam SJ: Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate: A review of its use in asthma. Drugs. 2009;69:1799–1828
    1. NAEPP: Expert panel report 3: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. 2007. (accessed October16, 2018)
    1. GINA: GINA report Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention 2018. (accessed October16, 2018)
    1. GOLD. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). 2017. (accessed February13, 2017)
    1. Steinfeld J, Yiu G, and Miller SD: Dose-ranging study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of four doses of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol multidose dry powder inhaler (FS MDPI) compared with fluticasone propionate (FP) MDPI and FS DPI in subjects with persistent asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135:AB6 [Abstract].
    1. Longphre MV, Getz EB, and Fuller R: Clinical bioequivalence of OT329 SOLIS and ADVAIR DISKUS in adults with asthma. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14:182–189
    1. Gerald JK: Generic competition for orally inhaled respiratory medications. Two steps forward, one step back. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14:165–167
    1. Kuna P, Thyroff-Friesinger U, Gath I, and Jones S: Randomized equivalence trial: A novel multidose dry powder inhaler and originator device in adult and adolescent asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015;36:352–364
    1. US National Library of Medicine: An open study to assess the robustness of the CRC749 inhaler. 2015. (accessed August2, 2019)
    1. US National Library of Medicine: Advair Diskus local equivalence study in asthma. 2014. (accessed August2, 2019)
    1. Mylan. Mylan announces FDA approval of Wixela™ Inhub™ (fluticasone propionate and salmeterol inhalation powder USP), first generic of ADVAIR DISKUS® (fluticasone propionate and salmeterol inhalation powder). 2019. (accessed August2, 2019)
    1. Food and Drug Administration: Draft guidance on fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate. 2013. (accessed October16, 2018)
    1. Haughie S, Allan R, Wood N, and Ward J: Equivalent systemic exposure to fluticasone propionate/salmeterol following single inhaled doses from Advair® Diskus® and Wixela® Inhub®: Results of three pharmacokinetic bioequivalence studies. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2019. [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2019.1537
    1. International Council for Harmonisation: International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use: Integrated addendum to ICH harmonised guideline: Guideline for good clinical practice E6 (R2); 2016
    1. World Medical Association: WMA Declaration of Helsinki—Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2018. (accessed October16, 2018)
    1. Allan R, Newcomb C, Canham K, Wallace R, and Ward J: Usability and robustness of the Wixela® Inhub® dry powder inhaler. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199:A2206
    1. Cooper A, Newcomb C, Wallace R, Canham K, Ward J, Allan R, Berry M, Parker J, and Clift E: Wixela® Inhub® dry powder inhaler—In vitro performance compared with advair diskus and inhalation profiles in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199:A2207
    1. Kavuru M, Melamed J, Gross G, Laforce C, House K, Prillaman B, Baitinger L, Woodring A, and Shah T: Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate combined in a new powder inhalation device for the treatment of asthma: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;105:1108–1116
    1. Shapiro G, Lumry W, Wolfe J, Given J, White MV, Woodring A, Baitinger L, House K, Prillaman B, and Shah T: Combined salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone propionate 250 microg in the diskus device for the treatment of asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:527–534
    1. Bateman ED, Silins V, and Bogolubov M: Clinical equivalence of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in combination (50/100 microg twice daily) when administered via a chlorofluorocarbon-free metered dose inhaler or dry powder inhaler to patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. Respir Med. 2001;95:136–146
    1. Fieller EC: Some problems in interval estimation. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1954:175–185
    1. Pocock SJ, Hughes MD, and Lee RJ: Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:426–432
    1. Boulet LP, FitzGerald JM, and Reddel HK: The revised 2014 GINA strategy report: Opportunities for change. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2015;21:1–7
    1. GlaxoSmithKline: ADVAIR DISKUS prescribing information. 2017. (accessed October16, 2018)
    1. Lu D, Lee SL, Lionberger RA, Choi S, Adams W, Caramenico HN, Chowdhury BA, Conner DP, Katial R, Limb S, Peters JR, Yu L, Seymour S, and Li BV: International guidelines for bioequivalence of locally acting orally inhaled drug products: Similarities and differences. AAPS J. 2015;17:546–557
    1. Day SJ, and Altman DG: Statistics notes: Blinding in clinical trials and other studies. Br Med J. 2000;321:19–26
    1. Pildal J, Hrobjartsson A, Jorgensen KJ, Hilden J, Altman DG, and Gotzsche PC: Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:847–857

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera