Long-term (up to 4.5 years) treatment with fingolimod in multiple sclerosis: results from the extension of the randomised TRANSFORMS study

Jeffrey A Cohen, Bhupendra Khatri, Frederik Barkhof, Giancarlo Comi, Hans-Peter Hartung, Xavier Montalban, Jean Pelletier, Tracy Stites, Shannon Ritter, Philipp von Rosenstiel, Davorka Tomic, Ludwig Kappos, TRANSFORMS (TRial Assessing injectable interferoN vS. FTY720 Oral in RRMS) Study Group, Jeffrey A Cohen, Bhupendra Khatri, Frederik Barkhof, Giancarlo Comi, Hans-Peter Hartung, Xavier Montalban, Jean Pelletier, Tracy Stites, Shannon Ritter, Philipp von Rosenstiel, Davorka Tomic, Ludwig Kappos, TRANSFORMS (TRial Assessing injectable interferoN vS. FTY720 Oral in RRMS) Study Group

Abstract

Objective: The 12-month (M), phase 3, double-blind, randomised TRANSFORMS study demonstrated significant benefits of fingolimod 0.5 or 1.25 mg over interferon β-1a (IFNβ-1a) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. We report the results of long-term (up to 4.5 years) extension of TRANSFORMS.

Methods: Patients randomised to fingolimod (0.5/1.25 mg) in the core phase continued the same dose (continuous-fingolimod) in the extension, whereas those on IFNβ-1a were re-randomised (1:1) to fingolimod (IFN-switch; IFN: 0.5/1.25 mg). Outcomes included annualised relapse rate (ARR), confirmed disability progression and MRI measures. Results are presented here for the continuous-fingolimod 0.5 mg and pooled IFN-switch groups.

Results: Of the 1027 patients who entered the extension, 772 (75.2%) completed the study. From baseline to the end of the study (EOS), ARR in patients on continuous-fingolimod 0.5 mg was significantly lower than in the IFN-switch group (M0-EOS: 0.17 vs 0.27). After switching to fingolimod (M0-12 vs M13-EOS), patients initially treated with IFN had a 50% reduction in ARR (0.40 vs 0.20), reduced MRI activity and a lower rate of brain volume loss. In a post hoc analysis, the proportion of IFN-switch patients with no evidence of disease activity increased by approximately 50% in the first year after switching to fingolimod treatment (44.3% to 66.0%). The safety profile was consistent with that observed in the core phase.

Conclusions: These results support a continued effect of long-term fingolimod therapy in maintaining a low rate of disease activity and sustained improved efficacy after switching from IFNβ-1a to fingolimod.

Clinical trial registration no: NCT00340834.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time to first confirmed relapse up to the end of the study (core intent to treat (ITT) population).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Annualised relapse rate of completers versus non-completers over time. *Number of patients who completed the study during M36–48. #Interval non-completers are patients who did not continue to the next yearly time interval. For interval non-completers, M0–24 summarises the aggregate ARR from M0 to M24 for patients who discontinued during the interval of M12–24. M0–36 summarises the aggregate ARR from M0 to M36 for patients who discontinued during the interval of M24–36. M0–48 summarises the aggregate ARR from M0 to M48 for patients who discontinued during the interval of M36–48. ARR, annualised relapse rate; IFN, interferon; M, month.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Between-group comparison of cumulative PBVC from core baseline. ***p

Figure 5

Comparison of NEDA status in…

Figure 5

Comparison of NEDA status in the core study and the first extension year…

Figure 5
Comparison of NEDA status in the core study and the first extension year by treatment group (A) IFN-switch group (B) Continuous-fingolimod group. Data presented here are for the pooled fingolimod 0.5 and 1.25 mg groups. N, total number of patients in the group; n, number of patients achieving NEDA; IFN, interferon; NEDA, no evidence of disease activity.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of NEDA status in the core study and the first extension year by treatment group (A) IFN-switch group (B) Continuous-fingolimod group. Data presented here are for the pooled fingolimod 0.5 and 1.25 mg groups. N, total number of patients in the group; n, number of patients achieving NEDA; IFN, interferon; NEDA, no evidence of disease activity.

References

    1. Cohen JA, Barkhof F, Comi G, et al. . Oral fingolimod or intramuscular interferon for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2010;362:402–15. 10.1056/NEJMoa0907839
    1. Khatri B, Barkhof F, Comi G, et al. . Comparison of fingolimod with interferon beta-1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a randomised extension of the TRANSFORMS study. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:520–9. 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70099-0
    1. [No authors listed] 2014 Joint ACTRIMS-ECTRIMS Meeting (MSBoston 2014) MS Journal Online: Poster Session 1. Mult Scler 2014;20(1 Suppl):67–284. 10.1177/1352458514546077
    1. Rio J, Castillo J, Rovira A, et al. . Measures in the first year of therapy predict the response to interferon beta in MS. Mult Scler 2009;15:848–53. 10.1177/1352458509104591
    1. Temple R. Hy's law: predicting serious hepatotoxicity. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2006;15:241–3. 10.1002/pds.1211
    1. Martinez-Yelamos S, Martinez-Yelamos A, Martin Ozaeta G, et al. . Regression to the mean in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2006;12:826–9. 10.1177/1352458506070820
    1. Kappos L, Connor PO, Radue E-W, et al. . Long-term effects of fingolimod in multiple sclerosis: the randomized FREEDOMS extension trial. Neurology 2015;84:1582–91. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001462
    1. Bevan CJ, Cree BA. Disease activity free status: a new end point for a new era in multiple sclerosis clinical research? JAMA Neurol 2014;71:269–70. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5486
    1. Khatri B, Barkhof F, Comi G, et al. . Fingolimod treatment increases the proportion of patients who are free from disease activity in multiple sclerosis compared to IFN-b1a: results from a phase 3, active-controlled study (TRANSFORMS) (PD5.006). Neurology 2012;78:PD5.006.
    1. Rio J, Rovira A, Tintore M, et al. . Relationship between MRI lesion activity and response to IFN-beta in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 2008;14:479–84. 10.1177/1352458507085555
    1. Prosperini L, Gallo V, Petsas N, et al. . One-year MRI scan predicts clinical response to interferon beta in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 2009;16:1202–9. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02708.x
    1. Prosperini L, Mancinelli CR, De Giglio L, et al. . Interferon beta failure predicted by EMA criteria or isolated MRI activity in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2014;20:566–76. 10.1177/1352458513502399
    1. Kappos L, Radue EW, O'Connor P, et al. . A placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2010;362:387–401. 10.1056/NEJMoa0909494
    1. Kappos L, Antel J, Comi G, et al. . Oral fingolimod (FTY720) for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1124–40. 10.1056/NEJMoa052643
    1. Comi G, O'Connor P, Montalban X, et al. . Phase II study of oral fingolimod (FTY720) in multiple sclerosis: 3-year results. Mult Scler 2010;16:197–207. 10.1177/1352458509357065
    1. O'Connor P, Comi G, Montalban X, et al. . Oral fingolimod (FTY720) in multiple sclerosis: two-year results of a phase II extension study. Neurology 2009;72:73–9. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000338569.32367.3d
    1. Calabresi PA, Radue EW, Goodin D, et al. . Safety and efficacy of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (FREEDOMS II): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:545–56.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera