A cluster randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote healthy lifestyle habits to school leavers: study rationale, design, and methods

Fiona Gillison, Martyn Standage, Bas Verplanken, Fiona Gillison, Martyn Standage, Bas Verplanken

Abstract

Background: Physical inactivity and a poor diet predict lifestyle diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain types of cancer. Marked declines in physical activity occur during late adolescence, coinciding with the point at which many young people leave school and enter the workforce and begin to take greater control over their lifestyle behaviours. The work outlined within this paper sought to test a theoretically-informed intervention aimed at supporting increased engagement in physical activity and healthy eating habits in young people at the point of transition from school to work or work-based learning. As actively engaging young people in initiatives based on health messages is challenging, we also tested the efficacy of financial incentives in promoting initial engagement with the programme.

Methods/design: A three-arm cluster-randomised design was used. Participants were school pupils from Year 11 and 13 (i.e., in their final year of study), aged 16-18 years. To reduce contamination effects, the unit of randomisation was school. Participants were randomly allocated to receive (i) a 12-week behavioural support intervention consisting of six appointments, (ii) a behavioural support intervention plus incentives (totalling £40), or (iii) an information-only control group. Behavioural support was provided by fitness advisors at local leisure centres following an initial consultation with a dietician. Sessions focused on promoting habit formation through setting implementation intentions as part of an incremental goal setting process. Consistent with self-determination theory, all advisors were trained to provide guidance in an autonomy-supportive manner so that they were equipped to create a social context supportive of autonomous forms of participant motivation. The primary outcome was objectively assessed physical activity (via GT1M accelerometers). Secondary outcome measures were diet, motivation and habit strength. Data were collected at baseline, post-intervention (12 weeks) and 12 months.

Discussion: Findings of this trial will provide valuable insight into the feasibility of promoting autonomous engagement in healthy physical activity and dietary habits among school leavers. The research also provides much needed data and detailed information related to the use of incentives for the initial promotion of young peoples' behaviour change during this important transition.

Trial registration: The trial is registered as Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN55839517.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary intervention map of systematic intervention design. *Note: Full details can be provided by the authors.

References

    1. Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, Gortmaker SL, Brown M. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):815–825. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60814-3.
    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999–2010. JAMA. 2012;307(5):483–490. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.40.
    1. Stamatakis E, Zaninotto P, Falaschetti E, Mindell J, Head J. Time trends in childhood and adolescent obesity in England from 1995 to 2007 and projections of prevalence to 2015. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(2):167–174. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.098723.
    1. Foresight. Tackling Obesities: Future Choices - Project Report. London: The Stationary Office; 2007. . (accessed Feb 12, 2014)
    1. Tirosh A, Shai I, Afek A, Dubnov-Raz G, Ayalon N, Gordon B, Derazne E, Tzur D, Shamis A, Vinker S, Rudich A. Adolescent BMI trajectory and risk of diabetes versus coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(14):1315–1325. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1006992.
    1. The NS, Suchindran C, North KE, Popkin BM, Gordon-Larsen P. Association of adolescent obesity with risk of severe obesity in adulthood. JAMA. 2010;304(18):2042–2047.
    1. Baranowski T, Cullen KW, Nicklas T, Thompson D. School-based obesity prevention: a blueprint for taming the epidemic. Am J Health Behav. 2002;26(6):486–493. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.26.6.9.
    1. Haase CM, Heckhausen J, Koller O. Goal engagement during the school–work transition: beneficial for all, particularly for girls. J Res Adolesc. 2008;18(4):671–698. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2008.00576.x.
    1. Ng TWH, Feldman D. The school-to-work transition: a role identity perspective. J Vocat Behav. 2007;71(1):114–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.004.
    1. Trudeau F, Laurencelle L, Shephard RJ. Tracking of physical activity from childhood to adulthood. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(11):1937–1943. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000145525.29140.3B.
    1. van Sluijs EM, McMinn AM, Griffin SJ. Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity in children and adolescents: systematic review of controlled trials. BMJ. 2007;335(7622):703. doi: 10.1136/.
    1. Doak CM, Visscher TL, Renders CM, Seidell JC. The prevention of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: a review of interventions and programmes. Obes Rev. 2006;7(1):111–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00234.x.
    1. Ryan RM, Deci EL. In: Handbook of Self Determination Research. Deci EL, Ryan RM, editor. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press; 2002. Overview of Self-Determination Theory: An Organismic Dialectical Perspective; pp. 3–33.
    1. Williams GC. In: Handbook of Self Determination Research. Deci EL, Ryan RM, editor. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press; 2002. Improving patient’s health through supporting the autonomy of patients and providers.
    1. Williams GC, McGregor HA, Zeldman A, Freedman ZR, Deci EL. Testing a self-determination theory process model for promoting glycemic control through diabetes self-management. Health Psychol. 2004;23(1):58–66.
    1. Williams GC, Patrick H, Niemiec CP, Ryan RM, Deci EL, Lavigne HM. The smoker’s health project: a self-determination theory intervention to facilitate maintenance of tobacco abstinence. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011;32(4):535–543. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.03.002.
    1. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78.
    1. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum; 1985.
    1. Edmunds JK. Perceived autnomy support adn pscyhological need satisfaction as key psychological constructs in the exercise domain. in press.
    1. Edmunds JK, Ntoumanis N, Duda JL. In: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Exercise and Sport. Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, editor. Champaign, IL, US: Human Kinetics; 2007. Perceived autonomy support and psychological need satisfaction in exercise; p. 375.
    1. Wilson DK, Griffin S, Saunders RP, Evans A, Mixon G, Wright M, Beasley A, Umstattd MR, Lattimore D, Watts A, Freelove J. Formative evaluation of a motivational intervention for increasing physical activity in underserved youth. Eval Program Plann. 2006;29(3):260–268. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2005.12.008.
    1. Standage M, Ryan RM. In: Advances in Motivation in Sport and Exercise. 3. Roberts GC, Treasure DC, editor. Champaign, U. S. A: Human Kinetics; 2012. Self-determination theory and exercise motivation: facilitating self-regulatory processes to support and maintain health and well-being; pp. 233–270.
    1. Levesque C, Copeland KJ, Sutcliffe RA. Conscious and nonconscious processes: Implications for self-determination theory. Can Psychol. 2008;49(3):218–224.
    1. Verplanken B, Wood W. Interventions to break and create consumer habits. Amer Mar As. 2006;25(1):60–103.
    1. Verplanken B. Beyond frequency: habit as mental construct. Br J Soc Psychol. 2006;45:639–656. doi: 10.1348/014466605X49122.
    1. Verplanken B, Walker I, Davis A, Jurasek M. Context change and travel mode choice: combining the habit discontinuity and self-activation hypotheses. J Environ Psychol. 2008;28(2):121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.005.
    1. Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2006;38:69–119.
    1. Verplanken B, Faes S. Good intentions, bad habits, and effects of forming implementation intentions on healthy eating. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1999;29:591–604. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<591::AID-EJSP948>;2-H.
    1. Verplanken B, Melkevik O. Predicting habit: the case of physical exercise. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2008;9(1):15–26. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.01.002.
    1. Ziegelmann JP, Luszczynska A, Lippke S, Schwarzer R. Are goal intentions or implementation intentions better predictors of health behavior? A longitudinal study in orthopedic rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 2007;52(1):97–102.
    1. Koestner R, Horberg EJ, Gaudreau P, Powers T, Di Dio P, Bryan C, Jochum R, Salter N. Bolstering implementation plans for the long haul: the benefits of simultaneously boosting self-concordance or self-efficacy. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2006;32(11):1547–1558. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291782.
    1. Wall J, Ni Mhurchu C, Blakely T, Rodgers A, Wilton J. Effectiveness of monetary incentives in modifying dietary behavior: a review of randomized, controlled trials. Nutr Rev. 2006;64(12):518–531. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2006.tb00185.x.
    1. Martinson BC, Lazovich D, Lando HA, Perry CL, McGovern PG, Boyle RG. Effectiveness of monetary incentives for recruiting adolescents to an intervention trial to reduce smoking. Prev Med. 2000;31(6):706–713. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0762.
    1. Kamb ML, Rhodes F, Hoxworth T, Rogers J, Lentz A, Kent C, MacGowen R, Peterman TA. What about money? Effect of small monetary incentives on enrolment, retention, and motivation to change behaviour in an HIV/STD prevention counselling intervention. Sex Transm Infect. 1998;74(4):253–255. doi: 10.1136/sti.74.4.253.
    1. Anderson JV, Bybee DI, Brown RM, McLean DF, Garcia EM, Breer ML, Schillo BA. 5 a day fruit and vegetable intervention improves consumption in a low income population. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101(2):195–202. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00052-9.
    1. Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(6):627–668. discussion 692–700.
    1. Moller AC, Buscemi CP, McFadden HG, Hedeker D, Spring B. Financial motivation undermines potential enjoyment in an intensive diet and activity intervention. J Behav Med. in press.
    1. Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. The undermining effect is a reality after all - extrinsic rewards, task interest, and self-determination: reply to Eisenberger, Pierce and Cameron (1999) and Lepper, Henderlong, and Gingras (1999) Psychol Bull. 1999;125(6):692–7000.
    1. Deci EL, Eghrari H, Patrick BC, Leone DR. Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. J Pers. 1994;62(1):119–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x.
    1. Marteau TM, Ashcroft RE, Oliver A. Using financial incentives to achieve healthy behaviour. BMJ. 2009;338:1415. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1415.
    1. Kok G, Schaalma H, Ruiter RA, van Empelen P, Brug J. Intervention mapping: protocol for applying health psychology theory to prevention programmes. J Health Psychol. 2004;9(1):85–98. doi: 10.1177/1359105304038379.
    1. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH. Intervention Mapping: Designing Theory and Evidence-Based Health Promotion Programs. Mountain View, California: Mayfield Publishing Company; 2001.
    1. Michie S. Designing and implementing behaviour change interventions to improve population health. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13(Suppl 3):64–69. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008014.
    1. Michie S, Ashford S, Sniehotta FF, Dombrowski SU, Bishop A, French DP. A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: the CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol Health. 2011;26(11):1479–1498. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2010.540664.
    1. Welk GJ, Blair SN, Wood K, Jones S, Thompson RW. A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S489–S497.
    1. Bingham SA. Dietary assessments in the European prospective study of diet and cancer (EPIC) Eur J Cancer Prev. 1997;6(2):118–124.
    1. Brown T, Kelly S, Summerbell C. Prevention of obesity: a review of interventions. Obes Rev. 2007;8(Suppl 1):127–130.
    1. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000;321(7262):694–696. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694.
    1. Officer CM, editor. Health Do. At least five a week: evidence on the impact of physical activity and its relationship to health. 2004.
    1. de Vries SI, Bakker I, Hopman-Rock M, Hirasing RA, van Mechelen W. Clinimetric review of motion sensors in children and adolescents. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(7):670–680. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.020.
    1. Markland D, Tobin V. A modification of the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2004;26:191–196.
    1. Wilson PM, Rogers WT, Wild TC. The psychological need satisfaction in exercise scale. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2006;28:231–251.
    1. Verplanken B, Orbell S. Reflections on past behavior: a self-report index of habit strength. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2003;33(6):1313–1330. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01951.x.
    1. Jago R, Baranowski T, Baranowski JC, Thompson D, Cullen KW, Watson K, Liu Y. Fit for Life Boy Scout badge: outcome evaluation of a troop and Internet intervention. Prev Med. 2006;42(3):181–187. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.12.010.
    1. Bacchetti P, Wolf LE, Segal MR, McCulloch CE. Ethics and sample size. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(2):105–110. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi014.
    1. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS, Cheong YF, Congdon RT, du Toit M. Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Scientific Software International: Lincolnwood, IL; 2011.
    1. Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Glasgow RE. The future of physical activity behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2004;32(2):57–63. doi: 10.1097/00003677-200404000-00004.
    1. Wood W, Tam L, Guerrero WM. Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;88:918–933.
    1. Croll JK, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M. Healthy eating: what does it mean to adolescents? J Nutr Educ. 2001;33(4):193–198. doi: 10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60031-6.
    1. O’Dea JA. Why do kids eat healthful food? Perceived benefits of and barriers to healthful eating and physical activity among children and adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103(4):497–501.
    1. Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J, Team RS. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006;332(7538):413–416. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.
    1. Harachi TW, Abbott RD, Catalano RF, Haggerty KP, Fleming CB. Opening the black box: using process evaluation measures to assess implementation and theory building. Am J Community Psychol. 1999;27(5):711–731. doi: 10.1023/A:1022194005511.
    1. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(1):26–33. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155.
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001;357(9263):1191–1194. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04337-3.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera