Combining brief contact interventions (BCI) into a decision-making algorithm to reduce suicide reattempt: the VigilanS study protocol

Stéphane Duhem, Sofian Berrouiguet, Christophe Debien, François Ducrocq, Anne Laure Demarty, Antoine Messiah, Philippe Courtet, Louis Jehel, Pierre Thomas, Dominique Deplanque, Thierry Danel, Michel Walter, Charles-Edouard Notredame, Guillaume Vaiva, Stéphane Duhem, Sofian Berrouiguet, Christophe Debien, François Ducrocq, Anne Laure Demarty, Antoine Messiah, Philippe Courtet, Louis Jehel, Pierre Thomas, Dominique Deplanque, Thierry Danel, Michel Walter, Charles-Edouard Notredame, Guillaume Vaiva

Abstract

Introduction: The early postattempt period is considered to be one of the most at-risk time windows for suicide reattempt or completion. Among the postcrisis prevention programmes developed to compensate for this risk, brief contact interventions (BCIs) have been proven to be efficient but not equally for each subpopulation of attempters. VigilanS is a region-wide programme that relies on an algorithmic system to tailor surveillance and BCI provisions to individuals discharged from the hospital after a suicide attempt.

Aim: VigilanS' main objective is to reduce suicide and suicide reattempt rates both at the individual level (patients included in VigilanS) and at the populational level (inhabitants of the Nord-Pas-de-Calais region).

Methods and analysis: At discharge, every attempter coming from a participating centre is given a crisis card with an emergency number to contact in case of distress. Patients are then systematically recontacted 6 months later. An additional 10-day call is also given if the index suicide attempt is not the first one. Depending on the clinical evaluation during the phone call, the call team may carry out proportionated crisis interventions. Personalised postcards are sent whenever patients are unreachable by phone or in distress. On the populational level, mean suicide and suicide attempt rates in Nord-Pas-de-Calais will be compared before and after the implementation of the programme. Here/there cross-sectional comparisons with a control region will test the spatial specificity of the observed fluctuations, while time-series analyses will be performed to corroborate the temporal plausibility of imputing these fluctuations to the implementation of the programme. On the individual level, patients entered in VigilanS will be prospectively compared with a matched control cohort by means of survival analyses (survival curve comparisons and Cox models).

Discussion: VigilanS interventional components fall under the ordinary law care regime, and the individuals' general rights as patients apply with no addendums or restrictions for their participation in the programme. The research section received authorisation from the Ethical Committee of Lille Nord-Ouest under the caption 'Study aimed at evaluating routine care' and is registered in 'Clinical Trials'. The French Ministry of Health plans to extend the experimentation to other regions and probe the relevance of this type of 'bottom-up' territorial prevention policy at the national level.

Trial registration number: NCT03134885.

Keywords: crisis management; emergencies; organization of healthcare; prevention; suicide; telemedicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
VigilanS’ territorial coverage in the Nord–Pas-de-Calais Region: inventory of the partner centres.
Figure 2
Figure 2
VigilanS’ algorithm for surveillance and brief contact interventions provision. SMS, short message service.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Data collection and evaluation timescales, as appraised through different levels of analysis. CS, completed suicide; C-SSRS: Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale; KSS, Knowledge of Suicide Scale; MINI, Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview; SA, suicide attempt.

References

    1. Pirkola S, Sohlman B, Wahlbeck K. The characteristics of suicides within a week of discharge after psychiatric hospitalisation - a nationwide register study. BMC Psychiatry 2005;5:32 10.1186/1471-244X-5-32
    1. Goldacre M, Seagroatt V, Hawton K. Suicide after discharge from psychiatric inpatient care. The Lancet 1993;342:283–6. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91822-4
    1. Zalsman G, Hawton K, Wasserman D, et al. . Suicide prevention strategies revisited: 10-year systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry 2016;3:646–59. 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30030-X
    1. du Roscoät E, Beck F. Efficient interventions on suicide prevention: a literature review. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2013;61:363–74. 10.1016/j.respe.2013.01.099
    1. Vaiva G, Ducrocq F, Meyer P, et al. . Systematic telephone contacting of patients leaving the emergency department after a suicide attempt: does it affect the one-year outcome? Syscall, a randomized controlled study. BMJ 2006;332:1241–5.
    1. Evans J, Evans M, Morgan HG, et al. . Crisis card following self-harm: 12-month follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2005;187:186–7. 10.1192/bjp.187.2.186
    1. Motto JA, Bostrom AG. A randomized controlled trial of postcrisis suicide prevention. Psychiatr Serv 2001;52:828–33. 10.1176/appi.ps.52.6.828
    1. Carter GL, Clover K, Whyte IM, et al. . Postcards from the EDge project: randomised controlled trial of an intervention using postcards to reduce repetition of hospital treated deliberate self poisoning. BMJ 2005;331:805 10.1136/bmj.38579.455266.E0
    1. Berrouiguet S, Gravey M, Le Galudec M, et al. . Post-acute crisis text messaging outreach for suicide prevention: a pilot study. Psychiatry Res 2014;217:154–7. 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.02.034
    1. Milner AJ, Carter G, Pirkis J, et al. . Letters, green cards, telephone calls and postcards: systematic and meta-analytic review of brief contact interventions for reducing self-harm, suicide attempts and suicide. Br J Psychiatry 2015;206:184–90. 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.147819
    1. Inagaki M, Kawashima Y, Kawanishi C, et al. . Interventions to prevent repeat suicidal behavior in patients admitted to an emergency department for a suicide attempt: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2015;175:66–78. 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.048
    1. Vaiva G, Jardon V, Ducrocq F, et al. . Surveillance Is a Powerful Tool to Prevent Suicidal Acts Courtet P, Understanding Suicide [Internet]: Springer International Publishing, 2016:269–79.
    1. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, et al. . The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59(Suppl 20):22–33.
    1. Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, et al. . The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry 2011;168:1266–77. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704
    1. Plancke L, Amariei A. Les conduites sucidaires dans le Nord - Pas-de-Calais. F2RSM Psy.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera