Phase 1a study of the CDK4/6 inhibitor, FCN-437c, in Chinese patients with HR + /HER2- advanced breast cancer

Jian Zhang, Xiaojia Wang, Xian Wang, Aimin Hui, Zhuli Wu, Ling Tian, Changjiang Xu, Yuchen Yang, Wenjing Zhang, Xichun Hu, Jian Zhang, Xiaojia Wang, Xian Wang, Aimin Hui, Zhuli Wu, Ling Tian, Changjiang Xu, Yuchen Yang, Wenjing Zhang, Xichun Hu

Abstract

Purpose This phase 1a, first-in-human study assessed the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity of FCN-437c, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor. Methods The study enrolled female patients with HR + /HER2- advanced breast cancer (BC) who failed standard of care therapy. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was utilized with a starting dose of 50 mg daily for 3 weeks on and 1 week off treatment in 28-day cycles. Patients received escalating doses of FCN-437c monotherapy (50, 100, 200, 300, and 450 mg). Results Seventeen patients received FCN-437c 50 mg (n = 3), 100 mg (n = 3), 200 mg (n = 3), 300 mg (n = 6), and 450 mg (n = 2). Two patients who received the 450-mg dose experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia); no DLT was observed at any other dose level. Frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were hematological: leukopenia (94.1%), neutropenia (88.2%), anemia (64.7%), and thrombocytopenia (47.1%). Grade 3-4 TEAEs included neutropenia (64.7%) and leukopenia (47.1%). Exposure of FCN-437c increased almost proportionally to doses ranging from 50 to 200 mg. At doses from 200 to 450 mg, there appeared to be a trend of saturation. The MTD was determined to be 300 mg. Of 15 patients with measurable disease, nine (60.0%) patients experienced stable disease; no complete or partial responses were observed. Conclusions These results established an acceptable safety profile for FCN-437c in patients with advanced BC, and there were no unexpected signals relative to other CDK4/6 inhibitors. (NCT04488107; July 13, 2020).

Keywords: Antitumor activity; CDK4/6 inhibitor; FCN-437c; Pharmacokinetics; Safety.

Conflict of interest statement

The study was initiated, funded, and sponsored by Avanc Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Jian Zhang, Xiaojia Wang, Xian Wang, and Xichun Hu declare no potential conflicts of interest. Aimin Hui is a full-time employee of Fosun Pharma USA Inc. Zhuli Wu, Changjiang Xu, Yuchen Yang, and Wenjing Zhang are full-time employees of Beijing Fosun Pharmaceutical Research and Development Co., Ltd. Ling Tian is a full-time employee of Avanc Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean plasma concentrations of FCN-437c versus time by dose level following a single dose (linear scale); b single dose (semi-log scale); c multiple doses (linear scale); d multiple doses (semi-log scale)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Waterfall plot and b spider plot of best percentage change from baseline in sum of diameters by dose level

References

    1. Cancer Facts and Figures (2019) American Cancer Society. . Accessed 21 April 2021
    1. Sherr CJ, Beach D, Shapiro GI. Targeting CDK4 and CDK6: From discovery to therapy. Cancer Discov. 2016;6:353–367. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.
    1. Santamaria D, Ortega S. Cyclins and CDKS in development and cancer: lessons from genetically modified mice. Front Biosci. 2006;11:1164–1188. doi: 10.2741/1871.
    1. Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490(7418):61–70. 10.1038/nature11412
    1. Lange CA, Yee D (2011) Killing the second messenger: targeting loss of cell cycle control in endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 18(4):C19–24. 10.1530/ERC-11-0112
    1. Spring L, Bardia A, Modi S (2016) Targeting the cyclin D-cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6-retinoblastoma pathway with selective CDK 4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: rationale, current status, and future directions. Discov Med 2(113):65–74
    1. O'Leary B, Finn RS, Turner NC. Treating cancer with selective CDK4/6 inhibitors (2016) Nat Rev Clin Oncol 13(7):417–430. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.26
    1. Piezzo M, Chiodini P, Riemma M, Cocco S, Caputo R, Cianniello D (2020) Progression-free survival and overall survival of CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Mol Sci 3;21(17):6400. 10.3390/ijms21176400
    1. Anders CK, Le Rhun E, Bachelot TD, Yardley DA, Awada A, Conte PF (2019) A phase II study of abemaciclib in patients (pts) with brain metastases (BM) secondary to HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 37(suppl 15):1017. 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.1017
    1. Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, Jones S, Im S-A, Gelmon K (2016) Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 17;375(20):1925–1936. 10.1056/NEJMoa1607303
    1. Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap Y-S, Sonke GS, Paluch-Shimon S (2016) Ribociclib as first-line therapy for HR-positive, advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 3;375(18):1738–1748. 10.1056/NEJMoa1609709
    1. Tripathy D, Im S-A, Colleoni M, Franke F, Bardia A, Harbeck N (2018) Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 19(7):904–915. 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30292-4
    1. Sledge Jr GW, Toi M, Neven P, Sohn J, Inoue K, Pivot X (2017) MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer who had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 35(25):2875–2884. 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7585
    1. Goetz MP, Toi M, Campone M, Sohn J, Paluch-Shimon S, Huober J (2017) MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 35(32):3638–3646. 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.6155
    1. Infante JR, Cassier PA, Gerecitano JF, Witteveen PO, Chugh R, Ribrag V (2016) A phase I study of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib (LEE011) in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res 22(23):5696–5705. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1248
    1. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. NDA/BLA multi-disciplinary review and evaluation NDA 209092 KISQALI (ribociclib). Available at: . Accessed 4 May 2021
    1. Piezzo M, Chiodini P, Riemma M, Cocco S, Caputo R, Cianniello D (2020) Progression-free survival and overall survival of CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Mol Sci 21(17):6400. 10.3390/ijms21176400
    1. Zheng J, Wu J, Wang C, Zhuang S, Chen J, Ye F (2020) Combination cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy versus endocrine monotherapy for hormonal receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 15(6):e0233571. 10.1371/journal.pone.0233571
    1. Schwartz GK, LoRusso PM, Dickson MA, Randolph SS, Shaik MN, Wilner KD (2011) Phase I study of PD 0332991, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, administered in 3-week cycles (Schedule 2/1). Br J Cancer 104(12):1862–1868. 10.1038/bjc.2011.177
    1. Flaherty KT, Lorusso PM, Demichele A, Abramson VG, Courtney R, Randolph SS (2012) Phase I, dose-escalation trial of the oral cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor PD 0332991, administered using a 21-day schedule in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res 18(2):568–576. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0509
    1. Doi T, Hewes B, Kakizume T, Tajima T, Ishikawa N, Yamada Y (2018) Phase I study of single-agent ribociclib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Sci 109(1):193–198. 10.1111/cas.13428
    1. Dickler MN, Tolaney SM, Rugo HS, Cortés J, Diéras V, Patt D (2017) MONARCH 1, a phase II study of abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor, as a single agent, in patients with refractory HR +/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 23(17):5218–5224. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0754

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera