Cognitive-behavioral intervention via interactive multimedia online video game for active aging: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Fernando L Vázquez, Ángela J Torres, Patricia Otero, Vanessa Blanco, Lara López, Antonio García-Casal, Manuel Arrojo, Fernando L Vázquez, Ángela J Torres, Patricia Otero, Vanessa Blanco, Lara López, Antonio García-Casal, Manuel Arrojo

Abstract

Background: Due to the progressive aging of the population, programs to promote active aging have been recommended. However, older adults have difficulty accessing them. Interventions administered through online video games may increase their accessibility, and complementing these with a smartphone app will likely increase adherence and allow for ongoing professional monitoring. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for active aging administered through an online interactive multimedia video game that includes a smartphone app companion. The secondary objectives are to analyze the moderators and mediators of the change in the outcome variables and to evaluate the adherence to the intervention.

Methods/design: A randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted. Adults 45 years and older will be randomly assigned to a cognitive-behavioral intervention administered through an online multimedia video game that includes a smartphone app companion or to a control group that will receive online information on active aging (274 participants per group). The intervention will be administered in eight weekly 45-min modules. An investigator-blinded evaluation will be conducted using online self-administered tests at baseline, post-intervention, and 6- and 12-month follow-ups. The primary outcome will be mental health status as evaluated using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at post-intervention. Secondary outcomes will be emotional well-being, depressive symptoms, reinforcement, negative thoughts, self-reported memory, cognitive task performance, sleep hygiene behaviors, physical activity, eating habits, body mass index, social support, dropout, treatment adherence, and satisfaction with the intervention.

Discussion: If the results are favorable, this study would involve the development of the first evidence-based active aging promotion intervention based on a video game that includes a smartphone app companion, providing evidence on its efficacy, accessibility, and clinical utility.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03643237. Registered 27 August 2018.

Keywords: Active ageing; Health promotion; Older adults; Study protocol; Video game.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
SPIRIT figure. Phases of the randomized controlled trial

References

    1. Eurostat . Population data. 2017.
    1. World Health Organization . Mental health and older adults. 2016.
    1. Farré M, Haro JM, Kostov B, Alvira C, Risco E, Miguel S, Cabrera E, Zabalegui A. Direct and indirect costs and resource use in dementia care: a cross-sectional study in patients living at home. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;55:39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.10.012.
    1. Sobocki P, Jönsson B, Angst J, Rehnberg C. Cost of depression in Europe. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2006;9:87–98.
    1. Eurostat. People in the EU: Who are we and how do we live? Luxembourg: Publisher is Publications Office of the European Union; 2015.
    1. World Health Organization . MhGAP intervention guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings. Version 2.0. Italy: World Health Organization; 2016.
    1. Bertolini P, Pisano E, Sivini S, Scaramuzzi S. Poverty and social exclusion in rural areas. Italy: European Commission. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities; 2008.
    1. Eurostat. European-Comission. Rural development statistics by urban-rural typology. . Accessed 24 Apr 2018.
    1. DeSmet A, Van Ryckeghem D, Compernolle S, Baranowski T, Thompson D, Crombez G, et al. A meta-analysis of serious digital games for healthy lifestyle promotion. Prev Med. 2014;69:95–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.026.
    1. Ballesteros S, Prieto A, Mayas J, Toril P, Pita C, Ponce de León LP, et al. Brain training with non-action video games enhances aspects of cognition in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:277. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00277.
    1. Buitenweg JIV, van de Ven RM, Prinssen S, Murre JMJ, Ridderinkhof KR. Cognitive flexibility training: a large-scale multimodal adaptive active-control intervention study in healthy older adults. Front Human Neurosci. 2017;11:529. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00529.
    1. U.S. Department of Commerce . Computer and internet use in the United States. 2016.
    1. Pew Research Center. Tech adoption climbs among older adults. . Accessed 22 June 2019.
    1. Wilkinson N, Ang RP, Goh DH. Online video game therapy for mental health concerns: a review. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2008;54:370–382. doi: 10.1177/0020764008091659.
    1. Rahmani E, Boren SA. Videogames and health improvement: a literature review of randomized controlled trials. Games Health J. 2012;1:331–341. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2012.0031.
    1. Primack BA, Carroll MV, McNamara M, Klem ML, King B, Rich M, et al. Role of video games in improving health-related outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42:630–638. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.023.
    1. Rothbaum BO, Hodges L, Smith S, Lee JH, Price L. A controlled study of virtual reality exposure therapy for the fear of flying. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68:1020–1026. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.68.6.1020.
    1. Shandley K, Austin D, Klein B, Kyrios M. An evaluation of ‘Reach Out Central’: an online gaming program for supporting the mental health of young people. Health Educ Res. 2010;25:563–574. doi: 10.1093/her/cyq002.
    1. Vázquez Fernando L., Otero Patricia, García-Casal J. Antonio, Blanco Vanessa, Torres Ángela J., Arrojo Manuel. Efficacy of video game-based interventions for active aging. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(12):e0208192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208192.
    1. Fleming T, Cheek C, Merry SN, Thabrew H, Bridgman H, Stasiak K, et al. Serious games for the treatment or prevention of depression: a systematic review. Rev Psicopatol Psicol Clin. 2014;19:227–242.
    1. Li J, Theng YL, Foo S. Exergames for older adults with subthreshold depression: does higher playfulness lead to better improvement in depression? Games Health J. 2016;5:175–182. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2015.0100.
    1. Howes SC, Charles DK, Marley J, Pedlow K, McDonough SM. Gaming for health: systematic review and meta-analysis of the physical and cognitive effects of active computer gaming in older adults. Phys Ther. 2017;97:1122–1137. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx088.
    1. Barnes DE, Yaffe K. The projected effect of risk factor reduction on Alzheimer’s disease prevalence. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:819–828. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70072-2.
    1. Baranowski T, Buday R, Thompson DI, Baranowski J. Playing for real: video games and stories for health-related behavior change. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34:74–82.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.027.
    1. Torres ACS. Cognitive effects of video games on old people. Int J Disabil Hum Dev. 2011;10:55–58. doi: 10.1515/ijdhd.2011.003.
    1. National Statistics Institute. Índice de envejecimiento por comunidad autónoma [Aging index by region]. . Accessed 26 Apr 2018.
    1. Levinson DJ. A conception of adult development. Am Psychol. 1986;41:3–13. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.1.3.
    1. Lewinsohn PM, Hoberman H, Teri L, Hautzinger M. An integrative theory of depression. In: Reiss S, Bootzin RR, editors. Theoretical issues in behaviour therapy. New York: Academic; 1985. pp. 331–359.
    1. Vázquez FL, Hermida E, Torres A, Otero P, Blanco V, Díaz O. Efficacy of a brief cognitive-behavioral intervention in caregivers with high depressive symptoms. Behav Psychol. 2014;22:79–96.
    1. Vázquez FL, Torres Á, Blanco V, Otero P, Díaz O, Ferraces MJ. Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy of a brief cognitive-behavioral depression prevention intervention for caregivers with elevated depressive symptoms. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016;24:421–432. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.02.050.
    1. Vázquez FL, Torres Á, Otero P, Blanco V, Díaz O, Estévez LE. Analysis of the components of a cognitive-behavioral intervention administered via conference call for preventing depression among non-professional caregivers: a pilot study. Aging Ment Health. 2017;21:938–946. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1181714.
    1. Tucker AM, Stern Y. Cognitive reserve in aging. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2011;8:354–360. doi: 10.2174/156720511795745320.
    1. Shapiro M. Plasticity, hippocampal place cells, and cognitive maps. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:874–881. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.6.874.
    1. Spector A, Thorgrimsen L, Woods RT, Orrell M. Making a difference: an evidence-based group programme to offer Cognitive Stimulation therapy (CST) to people with dementia. London: Hawker Publications; 2006.
    1. Aguirre E, Spector A, Streater A, Hoe J, Woods B, Orrell M. Making a difference 2: an evidence based group program to offer maintenance Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) to people with dementia. London: Hawker Publications; 2014.
    1. Light LL. Memory and aging: four hypotheses in search of data. Annu Rev Psychol. 1991;42:333–376. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.002001.
    1. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 1986.
    1. Spiegler MD. Contemporary behavior therapy. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2016.
    1. Gallin JI, Ognibene FP. Principles and practice of clinical research. San Diego: Academic; 2012.
    1. Grady D, Cummings SR, Hulley SB. Alternative trial design and implementation issues. In: Hulley SB, Cummings SM, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB, editors. Designing clinical research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. p. 151–70.
    1. Ferrando L, Bobes J, Gibert J, Soto M, Soto O. MINI. Entrevista Neuropsiquiátrica Internacional. Versión en Español 5.0.0. DSM-IV. Madrid: Instituto IAP.
    1. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59:22–33.
    1. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Janavs J, Weiller E, Keskiner A, et al. The validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) according to the SCID-P and its reliability. Eur Psychiat. 1997;12:232–241. doi: 10.1016/S0924-9338(97)83297-X.
    1. Lobo A, Saz P, Marcos G, Día J, de la Cámara, Ventura T, et al. Revalidation and standardization of the cognition mini-exam (first Spanish version of the Mini-Mental Status Examination) in the general geriatric population. Med Clin. 1999;112:767–74.
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98.
    1. Alonso J, Prieto L, Antó J. La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos [Spanish version of SF-36 Health Survey: an instrument for measuring clinical outcomes] Med Clin (Barc) 1995;104:771–776.
    1. Ware JE, Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.
    1. Vilagut G, Valderas JM, Ferrer M, Garin O, López-García E, Alonso J. Interpretación de los cuestionarios de salud SF-36 y SF-12 en España: componentes físico y mental. [Interpretation of SF-36 and SF-12 questionnaires in Spain: physical and mental components] Med Clin (Barc) 2008;130:726–735. doi: 10.1157/13121076.
    1. Rocha KB, Pérez K, Rodríguez-Sanz M, Borrell C, Obiols JE. Propiedades psicométricas y valores normativos del General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) en población general española [Psychometric properties and normative values of the General Health Quationnnaire (GHQ-12) for Spanish population] Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2011;11:125–139.
    1. Golderberg D, Williams P. A user’s guide to the General Health questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1988.
    1. Vázquez FL, Blanco V, López M. An adaptation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for use in non-psychiatric Spanish populations. Psychiatry Res. 2007;149:247–252. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.03.004.
    1. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306.
    1. Barraca J, Pérez-Álvarez M. Adaptación española del Environmental Reward Observation Scale (EROS) [Spanish adaptation of the Environmental Reward Observation Scale (EROS)] Ansiedad Estrés. 2010;16:95–107.
    1. Armento ME, Hopko DR. The Environmental Reward Observation Scale (EROS): development, validity, and reliability. Behav Ther. 2007;38:107–119. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2006.05.003.
    1. Otero P, Vázquez FL, Blanco V, Torres A. Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Pensamientos Automáticos (ATQ) en cuidadores familiares. [Psychometric properties of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ) in family caregivers.] Behav Psychol. 2017;25:387–403.
    1. Hollon SD, Kendall PC. Cognitive self-statements in depression: development of an automatic thoughts questionnaire. Cognit Ther Res. 1980;4:383–395. doi: 10.1007/BF01178214.
    1. Troyer AK, Rich JB. Psychometric properties of a new metamemory questionnaire for older adults. J Gerontol B-Psychol. 2002;57:P19–P27. doi: 10.1093/geronb/57.1.P19.
    1. Mastin DF, Bryson J, Corwyn R. Assessment of sleep hygiene using the Sleep Hygiene Index. J Behav Med. 2006;29:223–227. doi: 10.1007/s10865-006-9047-6.
    1. Puig A, Pena Ò, Romaguera M, Duran E, Heras A, Solà M, et al. Cómo identificar la inactividad física en atención primaria: validación de las versiones catalana y española de 2 cuestionarios breves [How to identify physical inactivity in primary care: validation of the Catalan and Spanish versions of 2 short questionnaires] Aten Primaria. 2012;44:485–493. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2012.01.005.
    1. Marshall AL, Smith BJ, Bauman AE, Kaur S. Reliability and validity of a brief physical activity assessment for use by family doctors. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:294–297. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.013771.
    1. Vuor I, Oka P, Stahl T. Promoting of health-enbancing physical activity. A preparatory European meeting. Tampere: UKK Institute; 1996.
    1. Segal-Isaacson C, Wylie-Rosett J, Gans KM. Validation of a short dietary assessment questionnaire: the Rapid Eating and Activity Assessment for Participants short version (REAP-S) Diabetes Educ. 2004;30:774–781. doi: 10.1177/014572170403000512.
    1. Block G. Invited commentary: comparison of the Block and the Willett food frequency questionnaires. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:1160–1161. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009601.
    1. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Dietary guidelines for Americans. . Accessed 5 Aug 2018.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . Healthy People 2010: understanding and improving health. 2. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000.
    1. World Health Organization. . Accessed 5 Aug 2018.
    1. Bellón JA, Delgado AS, Luna del Castillo JD, Lardelli P. Validity and reliability of the Duke-UNC-11 questionnaire of functional social support. Aten Primaria. 1996;18:153–63.
    1. Broadhead W, Gehlbach SH, De Gruy FV, Kaplan BH. The Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire. Measurement of social support in family medicine patients. Med Care. 1988;26:709–23.
    1. Vázquez FL, Torres Á, Otero P, Blanco V, Attkisson CC. Psychometric Properties of the Castilian Spanish Version of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) Curr Psychol. 2019;38:829–835. doi: 10.1007/s12144-017-9659-8.
    1. Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann. 1979;2:197–207. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6.
    1. Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hébert P. Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ. 2002;325:652–654. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7365.652.
    1. Schafer JL. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman Hall; 1997.
    1. Van Buuren S. Flexible Imputation of Missing Data. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 2018.
    1. White Ian R., Royston Patrick, Wood Angela M. Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine. 2010;30(4):377–399. doi: 10.1002/sim.4067.
    1. Barnard J, Rubin D. Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple imputation. Biometrika. 1999;86:948–955. doi: 10.1093/biomet/86.4.948.
    1. Li KH, Raghunathan TE, Rubin DB. Large-sample significance levels from multiply imputed data using moment-based statistics and an F reference distribution. J Am Stat Assoc. 1991;86:1065–1073.
    1. Graham JW. Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:549–576. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530.
    1. Jiang J. Linear and generalized linear mixed models and their applications. New York: Springer; 2007.
    1. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer; 2000.
    1. Kenward MG, Roger JH. An improved approximation to the precision of fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Comput Stat Data An. 2009;53:2583–2595. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2008.12.013.
    1. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals Stat. 2001;29:1165–1188. doi: 10.1214/aos/1013699998.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
    1. Kraemer HC, Blasey CM. Centring in regression analyses: a strategy to prevent errors in statistical inference. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004;13:141–151. doi: 10.1002/mpr.170.
    1. Hayes AF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millenium. Commun Mongr. 2009;76:408–420. doi: 10.1080/03637750903310360.
    1. Nouchi R, Saito T, Nouchi H, Kawashima R. Small acute benefits of 4 weeks processing speed training games on processing speed and inhibition performance and depressive mood in the healthy elderly people: evidence from a randomized control trial. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:302. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00302.
    1. Schoene D, Valenzuela T, Toson B, Delbaere K, Severino C, Garcia J, et al. Interactive cognitive-motor step training improves cognitive risk factors of falling in older adults. A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145161.
    1. Grönholm-Nyman P, Soveri A, Rinne JO, Ek E, Nyholm A, Neely AS, et al. Limited effects of set shifting training in healthy older adults. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:69.
    1. Souders DJ, Boot WR, Blocker K, Vitale T, Roque NA, Charness N. Evidence for narrow transfer after short-term cognitive training in older adults. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:41. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00041.
    1. Bacha JM, Gomes GCV, de Freitas TB, Viveiro LAP, da Silva KG, Bueno GC, et al. Effects of Kinect adventures games versus conventional physical therapy on postural control in elderly people: a randomized controlled trial. Games Health J. 2018;7:24–36. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2017.0065.
    1. Toril P, Reales JM, Ballesteros S. Video game training enhances cognition of older adults: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Aging. 2014;29:706–716. doi: 10.1037/a0037507.
    1. Bartholomew Eldredge LK, Markham CM, Ruiter RA, Fernández ME, Kok G, Parcel GS. Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 2016.
    1. Graesser A, Chipman P, Leeming F, Biedenbach S. Deep learning and emotion in serious games. In: Ritterfeld U, Cody M, Vorderer P, editors. Serious games: mechanisms and effects. New York: Routledge; 2009. pp. 81–100.
    1. Read JL, Shortell SM. Interactive games to promote behavior change in prevention and treatment. JAMA. 2011;305:1704–1705. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.408.
    1. Vygotsky LS. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. London: Harvard University Press; 1980.
    1. Granic I, Lobel A, Engels RC. The benefits of playing video games. Am Psychol. 2014;69:66–78. doi: 10.1037/a0034857.
    1. Kato Pamela M. Video Games in Health Care: Closing the Gap. Review of General Psychology. 2010;14(2):113–121. doi: 10.1037/a0019441.
    1. Kazantzis N, Deane FP, Ronan KR. Homework assignments in cognitive and behavioral therapy: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Sci Prac. 2000;7:189–202. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.7.2.189.
    1. Otero P, Vázquez FL, Hermida E, Díaz O, Torres Á. Relationship of cognitive behavioral therapy effects and homework in an indicated prevention of depression intervention for non-professional caregivers. Psychol Rep. 2015;116:841–854. doi: 10.2466/02.PR0.116k22w7.
    1. Andersson G, Cuijpers P. Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38:196–205. doi: 10.1080/16506070903318960.
    1. Nathan PE, Gorman JM. A guide to treatments that work. 3. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.
    1. Hollon SD, Muñoz RF, Barlow DH, Beardslee WR, Bell CC, Bernal G, et al. Psychosocial intervention development for the prevention and treatment of depression: promoting innovation and increasing access. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;52:610–630. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01384-7.
    1. New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America, Executive Summary. Rockville: DHHS; 2003.
    1. Goldstein J, Cajko L, Oosterbroek M, Michielsen M, Van Houten O, Salverda F. Video games and the elderly. Soc Behav Personal. 1997;25:345–352. doi: 10.2224/sbp.1997.25.4.345.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera