Creating a roadmap for delivering gender-sensitive comprehensive care for women Veterans: results of a national expert panel

Miriam deKleijn, Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen, Ismelda Canelo, Elizabeth M Yano, Miriam deKleijn, Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen, Ismelda Canelo, Elizabeth M Yano

Abstract

Background: Women Veterans are a significant minority of users of the VA healthcare system, limiting provider and staff experience meeting their needs in environments historically designed for men. The VA is nonetheless committed to ensuring that women Veterans have access to comprehensive care in environments sensitive to their needs.

Objectives: We sought to determine what aspects of care need to be tailored to the needs of women Veterans in order for the VA to deliver gender-sensitive comprehensive care.

Research design: Modified Delphi expert panel process.

Subjects: Eleven clinicians and social scientists with expertise in women's health, primary care, and mental health.

Measures: Importance of tailoring over 100 discrete aspects of care derived from the Institute of Medicine's definition of comprehensive care and literature-based domains of sex-sensitive care on a 5-point scale.

Results: Panelists rated over half of the aspects of care as very-to-extremely important (median score 4+) to tailor to the needs of women Veterans. The panel arrived at 14 priority recommendations that broadly encompassed the importance of (1) the design/delivery of services sensitive to trauma histories, (2) adapting to women's preferences and information needs, and (3) sex awareness and cultural transformation in every facet of VA operations.

Conclusions: We used expert panel methods to arrive at consensus on top priority recommendations for improving delivery of sex-sensitive comprehensive care in VA settings. Accomplishment of their breadth will require national, regional, and local strategic action and multilevel stakeholder engagement, and will support VA's national efforts at improving customer service for all Veterans.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Domains of gender-sensitive comprehensive care.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Conceptual framework for evaluating aspects of gender-sensitive comprehensive care.

References

    1. US Department of Veterans Affairs. National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics. Statistics at a Glance (August 2014).Washington, DC: US Department of Veterans Affairs; Available at . Accessed on November 15, 2014.
    1. Frayne SM, Phibbs CS, Saechao F, et al. Sourcebook: Women Veterans in the Veterans Health Administration Volume 3: Sociodemographics, utilization, costs of care and health profiles. 2014Washington, DC: Veterans Health Administration.
    1. Washington DL, Washington DL, Yano EM, et al. To use or not to use—Women veterans’ choices about VA health care use. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21suppl 3S11–S18.
    1. Washington DL, Kleimann S, Michelini AN, et al. Women veterans’ perceptions and decision-making about Veterans Affairs health care. Mil Med. 2007;172:812–817.
    1. Murdoch M, Bradley A, Mather S, et al. Women and war: what physicians should know. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21suppl 3S5–S10.
    1. Yano EM, Hayes P, Wright S, et al. Integration of women veterans into VA quality improvement research efforts: what researchers need to know. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;1:56–61.
    1. Washington DL, Caffrey C, Goldzweig C, et al. Availability of comprehensive women’s health care through Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. Womens Health Issues. 2003;13:50–54.
    1. Veterans Health Administration. Report of the Under Secretary for Health Work Group on Provision of Primary Care to Women Veterans. 2008Washington, DC: Women Veterans Health Strategic Health Care Group.
    1. Kimerling R, Street AE, Pavao J, et al. Military-related sexual trauma among Veterans Health Administration patients returning from Afghanistan and Iraq. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:1409–1412.
    1. DeCandia CJ, Guarino K, Clervil R. Trauma-informed Care and Trauma-specific Services: A Comprehensive Approach to Trauma Intervention. 2014Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
    1. Veterans Health Administration. Gender Differences in Performance Measures, Veterans Health Administration 2008-2011. 2012Washington, DC: Women Veterans Health Strategic Health Care Group.
    1. Bean-Mayberry BA, Yano EM, Brucker N, et al. Does sex influence immunization status for influenza and pneumonia in older veterans? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:1427–1432.
    1. Bean-Mayberry B, Yano EM, Bayliss N, et al. Federally funded comprehensive women’s health centers: leading innovation in women’s healthcare delivery. J Womens Health. 2007;16:1281–1290.
    1. Yano EM, Goldzweig C, Canelo I, et al. Diffusion of innovation in women’s health care delivery: VA adoption of women’s health clinics. Womens Health Issues. 2006;16:226–235.
    1. Yano EM, Bean-Mayberry B, Washington DL. Impact of Practice Structure on the Quality of Care for Women Veterans. 2008Washington, DC: VA HSR&D Final Report (04-036).
    1. Washington DL, Bean-Mayberry B, Mitchell MN, et al. Tailoring VA primary care to women veterans: association with patient-rated quality and satisfaction. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21supplS112–S119.
    1. Bean-Mayberry BA, Chang CH, McNeil MA, et al. Patient satisfaction in women’s clinics versus traditional primary care clinics in the Veterans Administration. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:175–181.
    1. Bean-Mayberry BA, Chang C, McNeil MA, et al. Assuring high quality primary care for women: predictors of success. Womens Health Issues. 2006;1691:22–29.
    1. Bean-Mayberry B, Chang C, McNeil M, et al. Comprehensive care for women Veterans: indicators of dual use of VA and non-VA providers. JAMWA. 2004;59:192–197.
    1. Washington DL, Bean-Mayberry B, Hamilton AB, et al. Women veterans’ healthcare delivery preferences and use by military service era: findings from the National Survey of Women Veterans. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28suppl 2S571–S576.
    1. Washington DL, Bean-Mayberry B, Riopelle D, et al. Access to health care for women veterans: Delayed health care and unmet need. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26suppl 2655–661.
    1. US Department of Veterans Affairs. Health Care Services for Women Veterans Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Handbook 1330.01. 2010Washington, DC: US Department of Veterans Affairs.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Primary Care. 1996Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. 2001Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
    1. Clancy CM, Massion CT. American women’s health care: a patchwork quilt with gaps. JAMA. 1992;268:1918–1920.
    1. Celik H, Lagro-Janssen TALM, Widdershoven GGAM, et al. Bringing gender sensitivity into healthcare practice: a systematic review. Patient Educ Counseling. 2011;84:143–149.
    1. Gijsbers Van Wijk CMT, Van Vliet KP, Kolk AM. Gender perspectives and quality of care: towards appropriate and adequate health care for women. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43:707–720.
    1. Judd F, Armstrong S, Kulkarni J. Gender-sensitive mental health care. Australas Psychiatry. 2009;17:105–111.
    1. Cordasco KM, Zephyrin LC, Kessler CS, et al. An inventory of VHA emergency departments’ resources and processes for caring for women. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28suppl 2S583–S590.
    1. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ. 1995;311:376–380.
    1. Friedman SA, Phibbs CS, Schmitt SK, et al. New women Veterans in the VHA: A longitudinal profile. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21supplS103–S111.
    1. Yano EM, Haskell S, Hayes P. Delivery of gender-sensitive comprehensive primary care to women veterans: implications for VA Patient Aligned Care Teams. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29suppl 2S703–S707.
    1. Wright SM, Schaefer J, Reyes-Harvey E, et al. Comparing the Care of Men and Women Veterans in the Department of Veterans Affairs. 2012Washington, DC: Veterans Health Administration.
    1. Kimerling R, Street AE, Gima K, et al. Evaluation of universal screening for military-related sexual trauma. Psychiatr Serv. 2008;59:635–640.
    1. Katzburg JR, Yano EM, Washington DL, et al. Combining women’s preferences and expert advice to design a tailored smoking cessation program. Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44:2114–2137.
    1. Bastian LA, Trentalange M, Murphy TE, et al. Association between women Veterans’ experiences with VA outpatient health care and designation as a women’s health provider in primary care clinics. Womens Health Issues. 2014;24:605–612.
    1. Hamilton AB, Frayne SM, Cordasco KM, et al. Factors related to attrition from VA healthcare use: findings from the National Survey of Women Veterans. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28suppl 2S510–S516.
    1. Department of Veterans Affairs. Expanded access to non-VA care through the Veterans Choice Program. Interim final rule. Fed Regist. 2014;79:65571–65587.
    1. Bielawski MP, Goldstein KM, Mattocks KM, et al. Improving care for chronic conditions for women veterans: identifying opportunities for comparative effectiveness research. J Comp Eff Res. 2014;3:155–166.
    1. Zephyrin LC, Katon JG, Yano EM. Strategies for transforming reproductive healthcare delivery in an integrated healthcare system: a national model with system-wide implications. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;26:503–510.
    1. Maguen S, Cohen B, Ren L, et al. Gender differences in military sexual trauma and mental health diagnoses among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Womens Health Issues. 2012;22:e61–e66.
    1. Vimalananda VG, Miller DR, Palnati M, et al. Gender disparities in lipid-lowering therapy among veterans with diabetes. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21supplS176–S181.
    1. Maisel NC, Haskell S, Hayes PM, et al. Readying the workforce: Evaluation of VHA’s comprehensive women’s health primary care provider initiative. Med Care. 2014(In press).
    1. Vogt DS, Barry AA, King LA. Toward gender-aware health care: evaluation of an intervention to enhance care for female patients in the VA setting. J Health Psychol. 2008;13:624–638.
    1. Whitehead AM, Czarnogorski M, Wright SM, et al. Improving trends in gender disparities in the Department of Veterans Affairs: 2008-2013. Am J Public Health. 2014;104suppl 4S529–S531.
    1. Keuken DG, Haafkens JA, Moerman CJ, et al. Attention to sex-related factors in the development of clinical practice guidelines. J Women’s Health. 2007;6:82–92.
    1. Campbell SM, Hann M, Roland MO, et al. The effect of panel membership and feedback on ratings in a two-round Delphi survey: results of a randomized controlled trial. Med Care. 1999;37:964–968.
    1. Isler MR, Corbie-Smith G. Practical steps to community engaged research: from inputs to outcomes. J Law Med Ethics. 2012;40:904–914.
    1. McNeil M, Hayes P. Women’s health care in the VA system: another “patchwork quilt.” Womens Health Issues. 2003;13:47–49.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera