Examining the association between meal context and diet quality: an observational study of meal context in older adults

Marissa M Shams-White, Robert W Korycinski, Kevin W Dodd, Brian Barrett, Stephanie Jacobs, Amy F Subar, Yikyung Park, Heather R Bowles, Marissa M Shams-White, Robert W Korycinski, Kevin W Dodd, Brian Barrett, Stephanie Jacobs, Amy F Subar, Yikyung Park, Heather R Bowles

Abstract

Background: Though a healthy diet is widely associated with reduced risks for chronic disease and mortality, older adults in the U.S. on average do not meet dietary recommendations. Given that few studies have examined the association between meal context on older adult diet quality, the aims of this study were (1) to compare the dietary quality of foods consumed in different meal contexts, as measured by the Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015): meal location, the presence of others, and the use of electronic screens; and (2) to examine which components of the HEI-2015 drove differences in HEI-2015 total scores by meal context.

Methods: Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP study participants (50-74 years) completed the Automated Self-Administered 24-h Dietary Assessment tool (ASA24, version 2011) that included foods and beverages consumed and three meal contexts: "at home" versus "away from home," "alone" versus "with company," and "with screen time" versus "without screen time." A population ratio approach was used to estimate HEI-2015 total and component scores for all food items consumed by meal context. Mean HEI-2015 scores (range: 0-100) for the three meal context variables were compared using t-tests. Where there were significant differences in total scores, additional t-tests were used to explore which HEI-2015 components were the primary drivers. All tests were stratified by sex and adjusted for multiple comparisons.

Results: HEI-2015 scores were lower for meals consumed away vs. at home (mean difference (SE), males: - 8.23 (1.02); females: - 7.29 (0.93); both p < 0.0001) and for meals eaten with vs. without company (mean difference (SE), males: - 6.61 (1.06); females: - 7.34 (1.18); both p < 0.0001). There was no difference comparing with vs. without screen time. When HEI-2015 component scores were examined, fewer total fruits, whole grains, and dairy were consumed away from home or with company; more total vegetables and greens and beans, and less added sugars were consumed with company.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest an association between the behavior cues of meal location and companions and dietary choices among older adults. Future studies can explore the individual and interactive effects of meal context on diet quality and subsequent health outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03268577.

Keywords: ASA24; Food away from home; Food environment; Healthy eating index; Meal location; Screen time; Social support.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Krebs-Smith SM, Pannucci TE, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Lerman JL, Tooze JA, et al. Update of the healthy eating index: HEI-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(9):1591–1602. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021.
    1. Harmon BE, Boushey CJ, Shvetsov YB, Ettienne R, Reedy J, Wilkens LR, et al. Associations of key diet-quality indexes with mortality in the multiethnic cohort: the dietary patterns methods project. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;101(3):587–597. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.090688.
    1. Liese AD, Krebs-Smith SM, Subar AF, George SM, Harmon BE, Neuhouser ML, et al. The dietary patterns methods project: synthesis of findings across cohorts and relevance to dietary guidance. J Nutr. 2015;145(3):393–402. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.205336.
    1. Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM, Miller PE, Liese AD, Kahle LL, Park Y, et al. Higher diet quality is associated with decreased risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality among older adults. J Nutr. 2014;144(6):881–889. doi: 10.3945/jn.113.189407.
    1. Schwingshackl L, Bogensberger B, Hoffmann G. Diet Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, Alternate Healthy Eating Index, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Score, and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(1):74–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.08.024.
    1. Food and Nutrition Service. HEI Scores for Americans U.S. Department of Agriculture 2019. Available from: . Accessed 18 Sept 2020.
    1. Lachat C, Nago E, Verstraeten R, Roberfroid D, Van Camp J, Kolsteren P. Eating out of home and its association with dietary intake: a systematic review of the evidence. Obesity Reviews. 2012;13(4):329–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00953.x.
    1. Cerin E, Nathan A, Choi WK, Ngan W, Yin S, Thornton L, et al. Built and social environmental factors influencing healthy behaviours in older Chinese immigrants to Australia: a qualitative study. Int J Behav Nutr Physical Activity. 2019;16(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0885-3.
    1. Carbonneau E, Lamarche B, Robitaille J, Provencher V, Desroches S, Vohl MC, et al. Social Support, but Not Perceived Food Environment, Is Associated with Diet Quality in French-Speaking Canadians from the PREDISE Study. Nutrients. 2019;11(12):3030.
    1. Bloom I, Edwards M, Jameson KA, Syddall HE, Dennison E, Gale CR, et al. Influences on diet quality in older age: the importance of social factors. Age Ageing. 2017;46(2):277–283.
    1. Conklin AI, Forouhi NG, Surtees P, Khaw KT, Wareham NJ, Monsivais P. Social relationships and healthful dietary behaviour: evidence from over-50s in the EPIC cohort, UK. Soc Sci Med (1982) 2014;100(100):167–175. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.018.
    1. Seguin R, Connor L, Nelson M, LaCroix A, Eldridge G. Understanding barriers and facilitators to healthy eating and active living in rural communities. J Nutr Metab. 2014;2014:146502. doi: 10.1155/2014/146502.
    1. Vesnaver E, Keller HH, Sutherland O, Maitland SB, Locher JL. Alone at the table: food behavior and the loss of commensality in widowhood. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016;71(6):1059–1069.
    1. Huffman FG, Vaccaro JA, Exebio JC, Zarini GG, Katz T, Dixon Z. Television watching, diet quality, and physical activity and diabetes among three ethnicities in the United States. J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:191465. doi: 10.1155/2012/191465.
    1. Sisson SB, Shay CM, Broyles ST, Leyva M. Television-viewing time and dietary quality among U.S. children and adults. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(2):196–200. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.016.
    1. National Cancer Institute . IDATA: National Institutes of Health. 2019.
    1. Park Y, Dodd KW, Kipnis V, Thompson FE, Potischman N, Schoeller DA, et al. Comparison of self-reported dietary intakes from the automated self-administered 24-h recall, 4-d food records, and food-frequency questionnaires against recovery biomarkers. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;107(1):80–93. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqx002.
    1. National Cancer Institute. Diet: ASA24 Cancer Data Access System 2020. Available from: . Accessed 22 Aug 2020.
    1. USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, 4.1. Beltsville: Agricultural Research Service, Food Surveys Research Group; 2010. Available from: .
    1. Bowman SA, Friday JE, Moshfegh A. MyPyramid Equivalents Database, 2.0 for USDA Survey Foods, 2003–2004 [Online] Food Surveys Research Group: Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Beltsville: Department of Agriculture; 2008.
    1. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2014 Data Documentation, Codebook, and Frequencies, Dietary Supplement Database September 2014 ed. Hyattsville (MD) National Center for Health Statistics, 2016. Available from: . Accessed 4 Mar 2021.
    1. Reedy J, Lerman JL, Krebs-Smith SM, Kirkpatrick SI, Pannucci TE, Wilson MM, et al. Evaluation of the healthy eating Index-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(9):1622–1633. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.019.
    1. National Cancer Institute. Population Ratio Method 2020. Available from: . Accessed 22 Aug 2020.
    1. Efron B, Stein C. The jackknife estimate of variance. Ann Stat. 1981;9(3):586–596. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176345462.
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300.
    1. Todd J, Mancino L, Line B. The Impact of Food Away From Home on Adult Diet Quality. In: ERR-90, editor.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2010. . Accessed 2 Sept 2020.
    1. Kirkpatrick SI, Reedy J, Kahle LL, Harris JL, Ohri-Vachaspati P, Krebs-Smith SM. Fast-food menu offerings vary in dietary quality, but are consistently poor. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(4):924–931. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012005563.
    1. Cruwys T, Bevelander KE, Hermans RC. Social modeling of eating: a review of when and why social influence affects food intake and choice. Appetite. 2015;86:3–18. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.035.
    1. Higgs S. Social norms and their influence on eating behaviours. Appetite. 2015;86:38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.021.
    1. Chae W, Ju YJ, Shin J, Jang SI, Park EC. Association between eating behaviour and diet quality: eating alone vs. eating with others. Nutr J. 2018;17(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0424-0.
    1. National Cancer Institute. Dietary Assessment Primer 2020. Available from: . Accessed 22 Aug 2020.
    1. Martines RM, Machado PP, Neri DA, Levy RB, Rauber F. Association between watching TV whilst eating and children's consumption of ultraprocessed foods in United Kingdom. Maternal Child Nutr. 2019;15(4):e12819. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12819.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera