A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial to investigate the effect of Tai Chi on the instrumented timed up and go test in people with mild to moderate dementia

Jonathan Williams, Samuel Nyman, Jonathan Williams, Samuel Nyman

Abstract

Background: Previous research has identified that Tai Chi is effective for reducing risk of falls and improving timed up and go scores. However, our previous research identified no-significant difference in time to complete the timed up and go test following a Tai Chi intervention in people with dementia.

Aim: To conduct a secondary analysis to extend our understanding of the effect of Tai Chi on the instrumented Timed Up and Go test.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial set in the community. People with dementia, recruited from NHS databases, memory clinics, local charities and self-referral across the south of England, received either 20 weeks of Tai Chi plus normal care or normal care. Outcomes were assessed using the instrumented Timed Up and Go test, completed at baseline and after 6 months.

Results: From 83 people with dementia volunteering for the study, 67 complete datasets were available for analysis. Within-group pairwise comparison across time revealed no-significant gains for any of the instrumented Timed Up and Go variables, and no-significant difference for between-group pairwise comparisons.

Discussion: This suggests that Tai Chi had no effect on the instrumented Timed Up and Go in people with dementia. This lack of effect may be due to the lack of specificity of the training stimulus to the outcome measure.

Conclusion: Tai Chi had no effect on any instrumented Timed Up and Go variables, suggesting Tai Chi may not be best placed to enhance the sub-elements of the instrumented Timed Up and Go to reduce fall risk among community-dwelling people with dementia.

Clinical trial registration number: NCT02864056.

Keywords: Balance; Clinical trial; Gait; Intervention; Sit to stand; Turning.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Jonathan Williams has consulted with THETAmetrix the company from which the sensor was purchased.

© 2020. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of study participation

References

    1. World Health Organization . WHO global report on falls prevention in older age. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
    1. Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors, and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing. 2006;35(2):37–41. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl084.
    1. Peel NM. Epidemiology of falls in older age. Can J Aging. 2011;30:7–19. doi: 10.1017/S071498081000070X.
    1. Butler R, Radhakrishnan R (2012) Dementia. BMJ Clin Evid 1001
    1. Taylor M, Delbaere K, Close J, Lord S. Managing falls in older people with cognitive impairment. Age Health. 2012;8:573–588. doi: 10.2217/ahe.12.68.
    1. Winter H, Watt K, Peel NM. Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older persons with cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25:215–227. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212001573.
    1. El-Khoury F, Cassou B, Charles MA, et al. The effect of fall prevention exercise programmes on fall induced injuries in community dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f6234.
    1. Sherrington C, Michaleff ZA, Fairhall N, et al. Exercise to prevent falls in older adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017;57:1750–1758. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096547.
    1. Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ, et al. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:007146.
    1. Pitkälä KH, Poysti MM, Laakkonen ML, et al. Effects of the Finnish Alzheimer Disease Exercise Trial (FINALEX): a randomized controlled trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:894–901. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.359.
    1. Suttanon P, Hill KD, Said CM, et al. Feasibility, safety and preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of a home-based exercise programme for older people with Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27:427–438. doi: 10.1177/0269215512460877.
    1. Huang Z, Feng Y, Li Y, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: Tai Chi for preventing falls in older adults. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e013661. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013661.
    1. Ng C, Fairhall N, Wallbank G, et al. Exercise for falls prevention in community-dwelling older adults: trial and participant characteristics, interventions and bias in clinical trials from a systematic review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019;5:e000663. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000663.
    1. Wesson J, Clemson L, Brodaty H, et al. A feasibility study and pilot randomised trial of a tailored prevention program to reduce falls in older people with mild dementia. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-13-89.
    1. Nyman S, Hayward C, Ingram W, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of Tai Chi alongside usual care with usual care alone on the postural balance of community-dwelling people with dementia: protocol for The TACIT Trial (TAi ChI for people with demenTia) BMC Geriatr. 2018;18:263. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0935-8.
    1. Lee LY, Lee DT, Woo J. The psychosocial effect of Tai Chi on nursing home residents. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19:927–938. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02793.x.
    1. Li JX, Hong Y, Chan KM. Tai chi: physiological characteristics and beneficial effects on health. Brit J Sports Med. 2001;35:148–156. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.35.3.148.
    1. Tadros G, Ormerd S, Dobson-Smyth P, et al. The management of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in residential homes: does Tai Chi have any role for people with dementia? Dementia. 2013;12:268–279. doi: 10.1177/1471301211422769.
    1. Nyman SR, Ingram W, Sanders J, et al. Randomised controlled trial of the effect of Tai Chi on postural balance of people with dementia. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:2017–2029. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S228931.
    1. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed up and go—a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x.
    1. Mirelman A, Weiss A, Buchman AS, et al. Association between performance on timed up and go subtasks and mild cognitive impairment: Further insights into the links between cognitive and motor function. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62:673–678. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12734.
    1. Salarian A, Horak FB, Zampieri C, et al. iTUG, a sensitive and reliable measure of mobility. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010;18:303–310. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2047606.
    1. Mellone S, Tacconi C, Chiari L. Validity of a smartphone based instrumented timed up and go. Gait Posture. 2012;36:163–165. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.02.006.
    1. Lee JE, Shin DW, Jeong S-M, et al. Association between timed up and go test and future dementia onset. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018;73:1238–1243. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx261.
    1. Van Lummel RC, Walgaard S, Hobert MA, et al. Intra-rater, inter-rater and test retest reliability of an instrumented timed up and go (iTUG) test in patients with Parkinson’s Disease. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0151881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151881.
    1. Galan-Mercant A, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Clinical frailty syndrome assessment using inertial sensors embedded in smartphones. Physiol Meas. 2015;36:1929–1942. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/36/9/1929.
    1. Palmerini L, Mellone S, Avanzolin G, et al. Quantification of motor impairment in Parkinson’s disease using an instrumented timed up and go test. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013;21:664–673. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2236577.
    1. Williams JM, Nyman S. Age moderated difference in performance on the instrumented timed up and go test between people with dementia and their informal caregivers. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2020 doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000265.
    1. Hsieh S, McGrory S, Leslie F, Dawson K, Ahmed S, Butler CR, et al. The Mini-Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination: a new assessment tool for dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2015;39:1–11. doi: 10.1159/000366040.
    1. Williams JM, Nyman S. Association between the instrumented timed up and go test and cognitive function, fear of falling and quality of life in community dwelling people with dementia. JFSF. 2018;3:185–193. doi: 10.22540/JFSF-03-185.
    1. Williams JM, Dorey C, Clark S, et al. The within-day and between-day reliability of using sacral accelerations to quantify balance performance. Phys Ther Sport. 2016;17:45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.04.002.
    1. Berg K, Berg K, Wood-Dauphine S, et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Canada. 1989;41:304–311. doi: 10.3138/ptc.41.6.304.
    1. Winser SJ, Tsang WW, Krishnamurthy K, et al. Does Tai Chi improve balance and reduce falls incidence in neurological disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32:1157–1168. doi: 10.1177/0269215518773442.
    1. Huang Y, Liu X. Improvement of balance control ability and flexibility in the elderly Tai Chi Chuan (TCC) practitioners: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;60:233–238. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.10.016.
    1. Zou L, Loprinzi PD, Yu L, et al. Superior effects of modified chen-style Tai Chi versus 24-style Tai Chi on cognitive function, fitness, and balance performance in adults over 55. Brain Sci. 2019;9:E102. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9050102.
    1. Housseini L, Kargozar E, Sharifi F, et al. Tai Chi Chuan can improve balance and reduce fear of falling in community dwelling older adults: a randomized control trial. J Exerc Rehabil. 2008;14:1024–1031. doi: 10.12965/jer.1836488.244.
    1. Reilly T, Morris T, Whyte G. The specificity of training prescription and physiological assessment: a review. J Sports Sci. 2009;27:575–589. doi: 10.1080/02640410902729741.
    1. Cheng FY, Yang YR, Chen LM, et al. Positive effects of specific exercise and novel turning-based treadmill training on turning performance in individuals with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33242. doi: 10.1038/srep33242.
    1. Lenth RV. Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination. Am Statist. 2001;55:187–193. doi: 10.1198/000313001317098149.
    1. Hoenig JM, Heisey DM. The abuse of power: the pervasive fallacy of paower calculation for data analysis. Am Statist. 2001;55:1–6. doi: 10.1198/000313001300339897.
    1. Levine M, Ensom MHH. Post hoc power analysis: an idea whose time has passed? Pharm. 2001;21:405–409.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera