Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of virtual group exercise for older adults delivered by trained volunteers: the ImPACt study protocol

Stephen Eu Ruen Lim, Samantha Meredith, Samantha Agnew, Esther Clift, Kinda Ibrahim, Helen Roberts, Stephen Eu Ruen Lim, Samantha Meredith, Samantha Agnew, Esther Clift, Kinda Ibrahim, Helen Roberts

Abstract

Introduction: Physical activity is important for healthy ageing. Despite strong evidence on the benefits of physical activity for health and well-being, physical inactivity remains a significant problem among older adults. This study aims to determine the feasibility and acceptability of implementing an online volunteer-led group exercise for older adults.

Methods: A quasi-experimental mixed-methods approach will be used in this study. A training programme will be developed to train volunteers to deliver online group exercises to older adults aged >65 years (n=30). The primary outcome is the feasibility of implementing the intervention. This will be assessed by the number of volunteers recruited, trained, and retained at the end of the study, and the number of exercise sessions delivered and completed by participants. Secondary outcomes include physical activity levels measured using the Community Health Model Activities Programme for Seniors questionnaire, Barthel Index, EQ-5D-5L as a measure of health-related quality of life, SARC-F to determine sarcopenia status, and PRIMSA-7 to determine frailty status. Outcomes will be measured at baseline and at 6 months.Qualitative interviews will be conducted with volunteers(n=5), older adults (n=10) and family members (n=5) to explore their views on the intervention.

Analysis: Simple descriptive statistics will be used to describe participant characteristics, the feasibility of the study and the impact of the intervention on health outcomes. Parametric(t-test) or non-parametric(Mann-Whitney U test) statistics will be used to analyse continuous variables. χ2 test will be used for categorical variables. Qualitative data will be analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach.

Ethics and dissemination: This study received ethical approval from the University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee and Research Integrity and Governance committee (ID: 52 967 .A1). Study findings will be made available to service users, voluntary organisations and other researchers who may be interested in implementing the intervention.

Trial registration number: NCT04672200.

Keywords: geriatric medicine; qualitative research; rehabilitation medicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Sherrington C, Fairhall N, Kwok W, et al. . Evidence on physical activity and falls prevention for people aged 65+ years: systematic review to inform the WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2020;17:144. 10.1186/s12966-020-01041-3
    1. Halaweh H, Willén C, Svantesson U. Association between physical activity and physical functioning in community-dwelling older adults. Eur J Physiother 2017;19:40–7. 10.1080/21679169.2016.1240831
    1. Fox KR, Stathi A, McKenna J, et al. . Physical activity and mental well-being in older people participating in the better ageing project. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007;100:591–602. 10.1007/s00421-007-0392-0
    1. Foster C, Reilly J, Jago R. Uk chief medical officers' physical activity guidelines. UK: UK Department of Health and Social Care, 2019.
    1. Sparling PB, Howard BJ, Dunstan DW, et al. . Recommendations for physical activity in older adults. BMJ 2015;350:h100. 10.1136/bmj.h100
    1. Cunningham C, O' Sullivan R, Caserotti P, et al. . Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: a systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2020;30:816–27. 10.1111/sms.13616
    1. Harris TJ, Owen CG, Victor CR, et al. . What factors are associated with physical activity in older people, assessed objectively by accelerometry? Br J Sports Med 2009;43:442–50. 10.1136/bjsm.2008.048033
    1. Jefferis BJ, Sartini C, Lee I-M, et al. . Adherence to physical activity guidelines in older adults, using objectively measured physical activity in a population-based study. BMC Public Health 2014;14:382. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-382
    1. Public health England . Wider impacts of COVID-19 on physical activity, deconditioning and falls in older adults. Available: [Accessed 05 Oct 2021].
    1. Marston HR, Genoe R, Freeman S, et al. . Older adults' perceptions of ICT: main findings from the technology in later life (till) study. Healthcare 2019;7:86. 10.3390/healthcare7030086
    1. Barbosa Neves B, Franz R, Judges R, et al. . Can digital technology enhance social connectedness among older adults? A feasibility study. J Appl Gerontol 2019;38:49–72. 10.1177/0733464817741369
    1. McGarrigle L, Todd C. Promotion of physical activity in older people using mHealth and eHealth technologies: rapid review of reviews. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e22201. 10.2196/22201
    1. Baez M, Khaghani Far I, Ibarra F, et al. . Effects of online group exercises for older adults on physical, psychological and social wellbeing: a randomized pilot trial. PeerJ 2017;5:e3150. 10.7717/peerj.3150
    1. Mundle C, Naylor C, Buck D. Volunteering in health and care in England: a summary of key literature, 2012. Available: [Accessed 05 Oct 2021].
    1. Naylor C, Mundle C, Weaks L. Volunteering in health and care: securing a sustainable future, 2013. Available: [Accessed 05 Oct 2021].
    1. Roberts HC, De Wet S, Porter K, et al. . The feasibility and acceptability of training volunteer mealtime assistants to help older acute hospital inpatients: the Southampton mealtime assistance study. J Clin Nurs 2014;23:3240–9. 10.1111/jocn.12573
    1. Lim S, Ibrahim K, Dodds R, et al. . Physical activity in hospitalised older people: the feasibility and acceptability of a volunteer-led mobility intervention in the SoMoVe™ study. Age Ageing 2020;49:283–91. 10.1093/ageing/afz114
    1. Lim SER, Cox NJ, Tan QY, et al. . Volunteer-led physical activity interventions to improve health outcomes for community-dwelling older people: a systematic review. Aging Clin Exp Res 2021;33:843–53. 10.1007/s40520-020-01556-6
    1. Tan EJ, Xue Q-L, Li T, et al. . Volunteering: a physical activity intervention for older adults--The Experience Corps program in Baltimore. J Urban Health 2006;83:954–69. 10.1007/s11524-006-9060-7
    1. Withall J, Thompson JL, Fox KR, et al. . Participant and public involvement in refining a Peer-Volunteering active aging intervention: project ACE (active, connected, engaged). Gerontologist 2018;58:362–75. 10.1093/geront/gnw148
    1. Goehner A, Kricheldorff C, Bitzer EM. Trained volunteers to support chronically ill, multimorbid elderly between hospital and domesticity - a systematic review of one-on-one-intervention types, effects, and underlying training concepts. BMC Geriatr 2019;19:126. 10.1186/s12877-019-1130-2
    1. Zoom. Available:
    1. Hekler EB, Buman MP, Haskell WL, et al. . Reliability and validity of CHAMPS self-reported sedentary-to-vigorous intensity physical activity in older adults. J Phys Act Health 2012;9:225–36. 10.1123/jpah.9.2.225
    1. Falck RS, McDonald SM, Beets MW, et al. . Measurement of physical activity in older adult interventions: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2016;50:464–70. 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094413
    1. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:64–7. 10.3109/09638288809164105
    1. Hopman-Rock M, van Hirtum H, de Vreede P, et al. . Activities of daily living in older community-dwelling persons: a systematic review of psychometric properties of instruments. Aging Clin Exp Res 2019;31:917–25. 10.1007/s40520-018-1034-6
    1. Rabin R, de Charro F, Fd C. EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Ann Med 2001;33:337–43. 10.3109/07853890109002087
    1. Pérez-Ros P, Vila-Candel R, Martin-Utrilla S, et al. . Health-Related quality of life in community-dwelling older people with cognitive impairment: EQ-5D-3L measurement properties. J Alzheimers Dis 2020;77:1523–32. 10.3233/JAD-200806
    1. Hulme C, Long AF, Kneafsey R, et al. . Using the EQ-5D to assess health-related quality of life in older people. Age Ageing 2004;33:504–7. 10.1093/ageing/afh178
    1. Ida S, Kaneko R, Murata K. SARC-F for screening of sarcopenia among older adults: a meta-analysis of screening test accuracy. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2018;19:685–9. 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.04.001
    1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. . Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019;48:16–31. 10.1093/ageing/afy169
    1. Raîche M, Hébert R, Dubois M-F. PRISMA-7: a case-finding tool to identify older adults with moderate to severe disabilities. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2008;47:9–18. 10.1016/j.archger.2007.06.004
    1. Hoogendijk EO, van der Horst HE, Deeg DJH, et al. . The identification of frail older adults in primary care: comparing the accuracy of five simple instruments. Age Ageing 2013;42:262–5. 10.1093/ageing/afs163
    1. Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, et al. . Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J 2008;204:291–5. 10.1038/bdj.2008.192
    1. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, et al. . Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health 2015;42:533–44. 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
    1. Guest G, Namey E, Taylor J, et al. . Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: findings from a randomized study. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2017;20:693–708. 10.1080/13645579.2017.1281601
    1. Bloor M, Frankland J, Thomas M, et al. . Focus groups in social research. London: Sage Publications, 2001.
    1. May CR, Mair F, Finch T, et al. . Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci 2009;4:29. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-29
    1. May C. Towards a general theory of implementation. Implement Sci 2013;8:18. 10.1186/1748-5908-8-18
    1. Normalization process theory toolkit. Available: [Accessed 05 Oct 2021].
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera