The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ)

Stuart Gatehouse, William Noble, Stuart Gatehouse, William Noble

Abstract

The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) is designed to measure a range of hearing disabilities across several domains. Particular attention is given to hearing speech in a variety of competing contexts, and to the directional, distance and movement components of spatial hearing. In addition, the abilities both to segregate sounds and to attend to simultaneous speech streams are assessed, reflecting the reality of hearing in the everyday world. Qualities of hearing experience include ease of listening, and the naturalness, clarity and identifiability of different speakers, different musical pieces and instruments, and different everyday sounds. Application of the SSQ to 153 new clinic clients prior to hearing aid fitting showed that the greatest difficulty was experienced with simultaneous speech streams, ease of listening, listening in groups and in noise, and judging distance and movement. SSQ ratings were compared with an independent measure of handicap. After differences in hearing level were controlled for, it was found that identification, attention and effort problems, as well as spatial hearing problems, feature prominently in the disability handicap relationship,. along with certain features of speech hearing. The results implicate aspects of temporal and spatial dynamics of hearing disability in the experience of handicap. The SSQ shows promise as an instrument for evaluating interventions of various kinds, particularly (but not exclusively) those that implicate binaural function.

References

    1. Bregman AS. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990.
    1. Byrne D, Noble W. Optimizing sound localization with hearing aids. Trends Amplification. 1998;3:51–73.
    1. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1995;16(2):176–186.
    1. Cox RM, Gilmore C. Development of the profile of hearing aid performance (PHAP) J Speech Hear Res. 1990;33:343–355.
    1. Gibson JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton-Miffin; 1979.
    1. Hétu R, Getty L, Philibert L, Desilets F, Noble W, et al. Mise au point d’un outil clinique pour la mesure d’incapacites auditives et de handicaps (Development of a clinical tool for the measurement of the severity of hearing disabilities and handicaps) J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol. 1994;18:83–95.
    1. Kramer SE, Kapteyn TS, Festen JM, Tobi H. Factors in subjective hearing disability. Audiology. 1995;34:311–320.
    1. Kramer SE, Kapteyn TS, Festen JM. The self-reported handicapping effect of hearing disabilities. Audiology. 1998;37(5):302–312.
    1. Noble W. Hearing, hearing impairment and the audible world: a theoretical essay. Audiology. 1983;22:325–338.
    1. Noble W. Self-assessment of Hearing and Related Functions. London: Whurr; 1998.
    1. Noble W, Ter-Horst K, Byrne D. Disabilities and handicaps associated with impaired auditory localization. J Am Acad Audiol. 1995;6(2):129–140.
    1. Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG. Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996;105(6):415–422.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera