Classification of the severity of diabetic neuropathy: a new approach taking uncertainties into account using fuzzy logic

Andreja P Picon, Neli R S Ortega, Ricky Watari, Cristina Sartor, Isabel C N Sacco, Andreja P Picon, Neli R S Ortega, Ricky Watari, Cristina Sartor, Isabel C N Sacco

Abstract

Objective: This study proposes a new approach that considers uncertainty in predicting and quantifying the presence and severity of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Methods: A rule-based fuzzy expert system was designed by four experts in diabetic neuropathy. The model variables were used to classify neuropathy in diabetic patients, defining it as mild, moderate, or severe. System performance was evaluated by means of the Kappa agreement measure, comparing the results of the model with those generated by the experts in an assessment of 50 patients. Accuracy was evaluated by an ROC curve analysis obtained based on 50 other cases; the results of those clinical assessments were considered to be the gold standard.

Results: According to the Kappa analysis, the model was in moderate agreement with expert opinions. The ROC analysis (evaluation of accuracy) determined an area under the curve equal to 0.91, demonstrating very good consistency in classifying patients with diabetic neuropathy.

Conclusion: The model efficiently classified diabetic patients with different degrees of neuropathy severity. In addition, the model provides a way to quantify diabetic neuropathy severity and allows a more accurate patient condition assessment.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Linguistic terms used in the model input sets.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Linguistic terms used in the model output sets.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Surface representing the severity of the disease based on symptoms and signs.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROC curve composed based on the gold standard database.

References

    1. Greene DA, Sima AAF, Stevens MJ, Feldman EL, Lattimers A. Complications: neuropathy, pathogenetic considerations. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:1902–25.
    1. Rathur HM, Boulton AJM. Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of diabetic neuropathy. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87B(12):1605–10.
    1. Shaw JE, Van Schie CHM, Carrington AL, Abbot CA, Boulton AJM. An analysis of dynamic forces transmitted through the foot in diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(11):1955–9.
    1. Akashi PM, Sacco IC, Watari R, Hennig E. The effect of diabetic neuropathy and previous foot ulceration in EMG and ground reaction forces during gait. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2008;23:584–92.
    1. Sacco ICN, Hamamoto AN, Gomes AA, Onodera AN, Hirata RP, Hennig EM. Role of ankle mobility in foot rollover during gait in individuals with diabetic neuropathy. Clin Biomech. 2009;24(8):687–92.
    1. Perry JE, Hall JO, Davis BL. Simultaneous measurement of plantar pressure and shear forces in diabetic individuals. Gait Posture. 2002;15:101–7.
    1. Davies M, Brophy S, Williams R, Taylor A. The Prevalence, severity and impact of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type II diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(7):1518–22.
    1. Dyck PJ, Albers JW, Andersen H, Arezzo JC, Biessels G, Bril V, et al. Diabetic polyneuropathies: update on research definition, diagnostic criteria and estimation of severity. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.1226. In press 2011,
    1. MNSI – Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument. Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center. 2010 [cited 2010 Aug] Available from: URL: .
    1. Meijer JW, Smith AJ, Sonderen EV, Groothoff JW, Eisma WH, Links TP. Symptom scoring systems to diagnose distal polyneuropathy in diabetes: the diabetic neuropathy symptom score. Diabet Med. 2002;19(11):962–5.
    1. Service FJ, Rizza RA, Daube JR, O'Brien PC, Dyck PJ. Near normoglycaemia improved nerve conduction and vibration sensation in diabetic neuropathy. Diabetologia. 1985;28(10):722–7.
    1. Dyck PJ, Davies JL, Daube J, Litchy WJ, O'Brien P. Longitudinal assessment of diabetic polyneuropathy using a composite score in the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study cohort. Neurology. 1997;49(1):229–39.
    1. Bril V, Perkins BA. Validation of the Toronto Clinical Scoring System for diabetic polyneuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(11):2048–52.
    1. Valk GD, de Sonnaville JJ, van Houtum WH, Heine RJ, van Eijk JT, Bertelsmann FW. The assessment of diabetic polyneuropathy in daily clinical practice: reproducibility and validity of Semmes Weinstein monofilaments examination and clinical neurological examination. Muscle Nerve. 1997;20(1):116–8.
    1. van de Poll-Franse LV, Valk GD, Renders CM, Heine RJ, van Eijk JT. Longitudinal assessment of the development of diabetic polyneuropathy and associated risk factors. Diabet Med. 2002;19(9):771–6.
    1. Wu EQ, Borton J, Said G, Le TK, Monz B, Rosilio M, et al. Estimated prevalence of peripheral neuropathy and associated pain in adults with diabetes in France. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(9):2035–42.
    1. Tesfaye S, Boulton AJM, Dyck PJ, Freeman R, Horowitz M, Kempler P, et al. Diabetic neuropathies: update on definitions, diagnostic criteria, estimation of severity, and treatments. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:2285–93.
    1. Carrington AL, Shaw JE, Van Schie CH, Abbott CA, Vileikyte L, Boulton AJ. Can motor nerve conduction velocity predict foot problems in diabetic subjects over 6-year outcome period. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(11):2010–5.
    1. Apelqvist J, Bakker K, van Houtum WH, Schaper NC. Practical Guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot. Based upon the International Consensus on the diabetic Foot (2007); Prepared by the International Working Group on the diabetic foot. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008;24(Suppl1):S181–7.
    1. Sosenko JM, Kato M, R Soto R, Bild DE. Comparison of quantitative sensory-threshold measures for their association with foot ulceration in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1990;13(10):1057–61.
    1. International Expert Committee. International Expert committee report on the role of the A1c assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1327–34.
    1. Massad E, Ortega NRS, Barros LC, Struchiner CJ. Fuzzy logic in action: Applications in epidemiology and beyond. 2008 New York: Springer.
    1. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.
    1. Bus SA, Deursen RWM, Kanade RV, Wissink M, Manning EA, Baal JG, et al. Plantar pressure relief the diabetic foot using forefoot offloading shoes. Gait & Posture. 2009;29(4):618–22.
    1. Allet L, Armand S, Aminian K, Pataky Z, Golay A, Bie RA, et al. An exercise intervention to improve diabetic patients' gait in a real-life environmental. Gait & Posture. 2010;32(2):185–90.
    1. Bacarin TA, Sacco ICN, Hennig EM. Plantar pressure distribution patterns during gait in diabetic neuropathy patients with a history of foot ulcers. Clinics. 2009;64(2):113–20.
    1. Duckstein L, Blinowska A, Verroust J. Fuzzy classification of patient state with application to electrodiagnosis of peripheral polyneuropathy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995;42(8):786–92.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera