Effects of surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity

Sven Fikenzer, T Uhe, D Lavall, U Rudolph, R Falz, M Busse, P Hepp, U Laufs, Sven Fikenzer, T Uhe, D Lavall, U Rudolph, R Falz, M Busse, P Hepp, U Laufs

Abstract

Background: Due to the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, medical face masks are widely recommended for a large number of individuals and long durations. The effect of wearing a surgical and a FFP2/N95 face mask on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity has not been systematically reported.

Methods: This prospective cross-over study quantitated the effects of wearing no mask (nm), a surgical mask (sm) and a FFP2/N95 mask (ffpm) in 12 healthy males (age 38.1 ± 6.2 years, BMI 24.5 ± 2.0 kg/m2). The 36 tests were performed in randomized order. The cardiopulmonary and metabolic responses were monitored by ergo-spirometry and impedance cardiography. Ten domains of comfort/discomfort of wearing a mask were assessed by questionnaire.

Results: The pulmonary function parameters were significantly lower with mask (forced expiratory volume: 5.6 ± 1.0 vs 5.3 ± 0.8 vs 6.1 ± 1.0 l/s with sm, ffpm and nm, respectively; p = 0.001; peak expiratory flow: 8.7 ± 1.4 vs 7.5 ± 1.1 vs 9.7 ± 1.6 l/s; p < 0.001). The maximum power was 269 ± 45, 263 ± 42 and 277 ± 46 W with sm, ffpm and nm, respectively; p = 0.002; the ventilation was significantly reduced with both face masks (131 ± 28 vs 114 ± 23 vs 99 ± 19 l/m; p < 0.001). Peak blood lactate response was reduced with mask. Cardiac output was similar with and without mask. Participants reported consistent and marked discomfort wearing the masks, especially ffpm.

Conclusion: Ventilation, cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and comfort are reduced by surgical masks and highly impaired by FFP2/N95 face masks in healthy individuals. These data are important for recommendations on wearing face masks at work or during physical exercise.

Keywords: Cardiopulmonary; Exercise capacity; FFP2/N95; Surgical masks; Ventilation.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Fitting of mask and leakage test. Fitting of spirometry mask with sm (A1) and ffpm (B1) and the respective leakage tests with sm (A2) and ffpm (B2)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effects of wearing a surgical mask (sm) and a FFP2/N95 mask (ffpm) compared to no mask on maximal power (Pmax), maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), ventilation (VE) and overall discomfort. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

References

    1. CDC (2020) Recommendation regarding the use of cloth face coverings, especially in areas of significant community-based transmission
    1. ECDC (2020) Using face masks in the community—reducing COVID-19 transmission from potentially asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic people through the use of face masks
    1. RKI Robert Koch-Institut: Mund-Nasen-Bedeckung im öffentlichen Raum als weitere Komponente zur Reduktion der Übertragungen von COVID-19. Strategie-Ergänzung zu empfohlenen Infektionsschutzmaßnahmen und Zielen (3. Update) Epid Bull. 2020;19:3–5. doi: 10.25646/673.
    1. WHO (2020) Advice on the use of masksin the context of COVID-19
    1. Xiao J, Shiu EYC, Gao H, Wong JY, Fong MW, Ryu S, Cowling BJ. Nonpharmaceutical measures for pandemic influenza in nonhealthcare settings-personal protective and environmental measures. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(5):967–975. doi: 10.3201/eid2605.190994.
    1. Leung NHL, Chu DKW, Shiu EYC, Chan K-H, McDevitt JJ, Hau BJP, Yen H-L, Li Y, Ip DKM, Peiris JSM, Seto W-H, Leung GM, Milton DK, Cowling BJ. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nat Med. 2020;26(5):676–680. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0843-2.
    1. Shiu EYC, Leung NHL, Cowling BJ. Controversy around airborne versus droplet transmission of respiratory viruses: implication for infection prevention. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2019;32(4):372–379. doi: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000563.
    1. CDC (2019) Determination of particulate filter efficiency level of N95 series filters against solid particulates for non-powered, air-purifying respirators standard
    1. Loeb M, Dafoe N, Mahony J, John M, Sarabia A, Glavin V, Webby R, Smieja M, Earn DJ, Chong S, Webb A, Walter SD. Surgical mask vs N95 respirator for preventing influenza among health care workers: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009;302(17):1865–1871. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1466.
    1. Radonovich LJ, Jr, Simberkoff MS, Bessesen MT, Brown AC, Cummings DAT, Gaydos CA, Los JG, Krosche AE, Gibert CL, Gorse GJ, Nyquist AC, Reich NG, Rodriguez-Barradas MC, Price CS, Perl TM. N95 respirators vs medical masks for preventing influenza among health care personnel: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322(9):824–833. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11645.
    1. Johnson AT. Respirator masks protect health but impact performance: a review. J Biol Eng. 2016;10:4. doi: 10.1186/s13036-016-0025-4.
    1. Blocken BMF van Druenen T, Marchal T (2020) Towards aerodynamically equivalent COVID-19 1.5 m social distancing for walking and running
    1. Quickcalcs G (2018) Random numbers
    1. Li Y, Tokura H, Guo YP, Wong ASW, Wong T, Chung J, Newton E. Effects of wearing N95 and surgical facemasks on heart rate, thermal stress and subjective sensations. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005;78(6):501–509. doi: 10.1007/s00420-004-0584-4.
    1. Lee HP, de Wang Y. Objective assessment of increase in breathing resistance of N95 respirators on human subjects. Ann Occup Hyg. 2011;55(8):917–921. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer065.
    1. Melissant CF, Lammers JW, Demedts M. Relationship between external resistances, lung function changes and maximal exercise capacity. Eur Respir J. 1998;11(6):1369–1375. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.11061369.
    1. Louhevaara VA. Physiological effects associated with the use of respiratory protective devices. A review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1984;10(5):275–281. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2327.
    1. Kyung SY, Kim Y, Hwang H, Park JW, Jeong SH. Risks of N95 face mask use in subjects with COPD. Respir Care. 2020;65(5):658–664. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06713.
    1. Harms CA, Wetter TJ, McClaran SR, Pegelow DF, Nickele GA, Nelson WB, Hanson P, Dempsey JA. Effects of respiratory muscle work on cardiac output and its distribution during maximal exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1998;85(2):609–618. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.2.609.
    1. Convertino VA, Cooke WH, Lurie KG. Inspiratory resistance as a potential treatment for orthostatic intolerance and hemorrhagic shock. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005;76(4):319–325.
    1. Ryan KL, Cooke WH, Rickards CA, Lurie KG. Convertino VA (2008) Breathing through an inspiratory threshold device improves stroke volume during central hypovolemia in humans. J Appl Physiol. 1985;104(5):1402–1409. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00439.2007.
    1. Cheyne WS, Harper MI, Gelinas JC, Sasso JP, Eves ND. Mechanical cardiopulmonary interactions during exercise in health and disease. J Appl Physiol. 2020;128(5):1271–1279. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00339.2019.
    1. Amann M, Blain GM, Proctor LT, Sebranek JJ, Pegelow DF, Dempsey JA. Implications of group III and IV muscle afferents for high-intensity endurance exercise performance in humans. J Physiol. 2011;589(Pt 21):5299–5309. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.213769.
    1. Amann M, Proctor LT, Sebranek JJ, Pegelow DF, Dempsey JA. Opioid-mediated muscle afferents inhibit central motor drive and limit peripheral muscle fatigue development in humans. J Physiol. 2009;587(1):271–283. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.163303.
    1. Blain GM, Mangum TS, Sidhu SK, Weavil JC, Hureau TJ, Jessop JE, Bledsoe AD, Richardson RS, Amann M. Group III/IV muscle afferents limit the intramuscular metabolic perturbation during whole body exercise in humans. J Physiol. 2016;594(18):5303–5315. doi: 10.1113/jp272283.
    1. Caneppele TMF, Borges AB, Pereira DM, Fagundes AA, Fidalgo TKS, Maia LC. Mouthguard use and cardiopulmonary capacity—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med Int Open. 2017;1(5):E172–e182. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-117599.
    1. Francis KT, Brasher J. Physiological effects of wearing mouthguards. Br J Sports Med. 1991;25(4):227–231. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.25.4.227.
    1. Bailey SP, Willauer TJ, Balilionis G, Wilson LE, Salley JT, Bailey EK, Strickland TL. Effects of an over-the-counter vented mouthguard on cardiorespiratory responses to exercise and physical agility. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(3):678–684. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000668.
    1. Kisely S, Warren N, McMahon L, Dalais C, Henry I, Siskind D. Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020;369:m1642. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1642.
    1. Powell JB, Kim J-H, Roberge RJ. Powered air-purifying respirator use in healthcare: Effects on thermal sensations and comfort. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017;14(12):947–954. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1358817.
    1. Damasio A, Carvalho GB. The nature of feelings: evolutionary and neurobiological origins. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(2):143–152. doi: 10.1038/nrn3403.
    1. Strigo IA, Craig AD. Interoception, homeostatic emotions and sympathovagal balance. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016;371:1708. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0010.
    1. Siebenmann C, Rasmussen P, Sørensen H, Zaar M, Hvidtfeldt M, Pichon A, Secher NH, Lundby C. Cardiac output during exercise: a comparison of four methods. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(1):e20–27. doi: 10.1111/sms.12201.
    1. Astorino TA, Edmunds RM, Clark A, King L, Gallant RA, Namm S, Fischer A, Wood KM. High-intensity interval training increases cardiac output and VO2max. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(2):265–273. doi: 10.1249/mss.0000000000001099.
    1. Daussin FN, Ponsot E, Dufour SP, Lonsdorfer-Wolf E, Doutreleau S, Geny B, Piquard F, Richard R. Improvement of VO2max by cardiac output and oxygen extraction adaptation during intermittent versus continuous endurance training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;101(3):377–383. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0499-3.
    1. Lepretre PM, Koralsztein JP, Billat VL. Effect of exercise intensity on relationship between VO2max and cardiac output. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(8):1357–1363. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000135977.12456.8f.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera