Effect of a Mobile Health Application With Nurse Support on Quality of Life Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Hong Kong: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Arkers Kwan Ching Wong, Frances Kam Yuet Wong, Karen Kit Sum Chow, Siu Man Wong, Jonathan Bayuo, Annie Ka Ying Ho, Arkers Kwan Ching Wong, Frances Kam Yuet Wong, Karen Kit Sum Chow, Siu Man Wong, Jonathan Bayuo, Annie Ka Ying Ho

Abstract

Importance: Mobile health (mHealth) smartphone apps are becoming increasingly popular among older adults, although the reactive care approach of these apps has limited their usability.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of an interactive mHealth program supported by a health-social partnership team on quality of life (QOL) among community-dwelling older adults in Hong Kong.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a 3-group, randomized clinical trial conducted in 5 community centers in Hong Kong from December 1, 2020, to April 30, 2022, with a last follow-up date of January 31, 2022. Participants included older adults aged at least 60 years who were living within the service area, used a smartphone, and had at least 1 of the following problems: chronic pain, hypertension, or diabetes. Data were analyzed from May 1 to 10, 2022.

Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to the mHealth with interactivity (mHealth+I) group, mHealth group, or control group. Participants in the mHealth+I group received the mHealth app and nurse case management supported by a health-social partnership team. The mHealth group received the mHealth app only. The control group received no mHealth app or health-social care services.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the change in QOL from baseline to 3 months after completion of the intervention.

Results: Among 221 participants (mean [SD] age 76.6 [8.0] years; 185 [83.7%] women), 76 were randomized to the control group, 71 were randomized to the mHealth group, and 74 were randomized to the mHealth+I group. The most common chronic diseases or problems were hypertension (147 participants [66.5%]), pain (144 participants [65.2%]), cataracts (72 participants [32.6%]), and diabetes (61 participants [27.6%]). At 3 months after the intervention and compared with the intervention group, there were no statistically significant differences in either the physical component summary (mHealth+I: β = -1.01 [95% CI, -4.13 to 2.11]; P = .53; mHealth: β = 0.22 [95% CI, -3.07 to 3.50]; P = .90) or the mental component summary (mHealth+I: β = -0.87 [95% CI, -4.42 to 2.69]; P = .63; mHealth: β = 1.73 [95% CI, -1.89 to 5.34]; P = .35) QOL scores. Only secondary outcomes, including self-efficacy (β = -2.31 [95% CI, -4.26 to -0.36]; P = .02), systolic blood pressure (β = -2.30 [95% CI, -5.00 to -0.13]; P = .04), pain levels (β = 1.18 [95% CI, 0.52 to 2.00]; P = .02), and health services utilization (β = 0.98 [95% CI, 0.32 to 2.09]; P = .048) improved in the mHealth+I group compared with the control group.

Conclusions and relevance: This randomized clinical trial found no difference in the primary outcome between the mHealth+I group and the control group confirming that there were no incremental benefits to adding interactivity in mHealth programs for older adults with chronic diseases.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03878212.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure.. Participant Recruitment Flowchart
Figure.. Participant Recruitment Flowchart
mHealth+I indicates mobile health app plus interactive support from a nurse case manager supported by a health-social partnership team.

References

    1. Whitlock LA, McLaughlin AC. Identifying usability problems of blood glucose tracking apps for older adult users. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2012;56(1):115-119. doi:10.1177/1071181312561001
    1. Kim BY, Lee J. Smart devices for older adults managing chronic disease: a scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(5):e69. doi:10.2196/mhealth.7141
    1. Imeri H, Desselle S, Hetemi D, Hoti K. Mobile electronic devices as means of facilitating patient activation and health professional empowerment related to information seeking on chronic conditions and medications: qualitative study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(8):e26300. doi:10.2196/26300
    1. Nundy S, Dick JJ, Goddu AP, et al. . Using mobile health to support the chronic care model: developing an institutional initiative. Int J Telemed Appl. 2012;2012:871925-871928. doi:10.1155/2012/871925
    1. Pew Research Center . Mobile fact sheet. Accessed February 26, 2022.
    1. Blomberg K, Wengström Y, Sundberg K, et al. . Symptoms and self-care strategies during and six months after radiotherapy for prostate cancer—scoping the perspectives of patients, professionals and literature. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016;21:139-145. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2015.09.004
    1. World Health Organization . Health 2020: A European policy Framework and Strategy for the 21st Century. WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2013.
    1. Kitsiou S, Paré G, Jaana M, Gerber B. Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for patients with diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173160. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173160
    1. Göransson C, Eriksson I, Ziegert K, et al. . Testing an app for reporting health concerns-Experiences from older people and home care nurses. Int J Older People Nurs. 2018;13(2):e12181. doi:10.1111/opn.12181
    1. Wong AKC, Wong FKY, Ngai JSC, Hung SYK, Li WC. Effectiveness of a health-social partnership program for discharged non-frail older adults: a pilot study. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):339. doi:10.1186/s12877-020-01722-5
    1. Bradway M, Morris RL, Giordanengo A, Årsand E. How mHealth can facilitate collaboration in diabetes care: qualitative analysis of co-design workshops. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1104. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05955-3
    1. Wong AKC, Wong FKY, Chang K. Effectiveness of a community-based self-care promoting program for community-dwelling older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2019;48(6):852-858. doi:10.1093/ageing/afz095
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149-1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
    1. Wong AKC, Wong FKY, Chang KKP. A proactive mobile health application program for promoting self-care health management among older adults in the community: study protocol of a three-arm randomized controlled trial. Gerontology. 2020;66(5):506-513. doi:10.1159/000509129
    1. Bronfenbrenner U. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. Am Psychol. 1977;32(7):513-531. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
    1. Martin KS. The Omaha System: A Key to Practice, Documentation, and Information Management. Elsevier Suanders; 2005.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Home care: delivering personal care and practical support to older people living in their own homes. Accessed February 26, 2022.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co; 1997.
    1. Gittell JH. Relationships between service providers and their impact on customers. J Serv Res. 2002;4(4):299-311. doi:10.1177/1094670502004004007
    1. Lam CLK, Wong CKH, Lam ETP, Huang WW, Lo YYC. Population norm of Chinese (HK) SF-12 health survey version 2 of Chinese adults in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Pract. 2010;32:77-86.
    1. Leung DY, Leung AY. Factor structure and gender invariance of the Chinese General Self-Efficacy Scale among soon-to-be-aged adults. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(6):1383-1392. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05529.x
    1. World Health Organization . Indicator Metadata Registry List: mean fasting blood glucose. Accessed May 4, 2022.
    1. Chiu HF, Lee HC, Wing YK, Kwong PK, Leung CM, Chung DW. Reliability, validity and structure of the Chinese Geriatric Depression Scale in a Hong Kong context: a preliminary report. Singapore Med J. 1994;35(5):477-480.
    1. Petersen M, Hempler NF. Development and testing of a mobile application to support diabetes self-management for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a design thinking case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17(1):91. doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0493-6

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera