Safety and tolerability of short-term infusions of intravenous lacosamide in pediatric patients with epilepsy: An open-label, phase 2/3 trial

Mark Kristof Farkas, Cynthia Beller, Ali Bozorg, Carrie McClung, Robert Roebling, Tanisia Yates, Nancy Yuen, Iryna Makedonska, Mark Kristof Farkas, Cynthia Beller, Ali Bozorg, Carrie McClung, Robert Roebling, Tanisia Yates, Nancy Yuen, Iryna Makedonska

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of intravenous (IV) lacosamide infusion in patients aged ≥1 month to <17 years with epilepsy.

Methods: This Phase 2/3 open-label trial (EP0060; NCT02710890) enrolled patients in two age cohorts (cohort 1: ≥8 to <17 years; cohort 2: ≥1 month to <8 years). Eligible patients were receiving oral lacosamide as adjunctive treatment or monotherapy (in an open-label long-term trial or by prescription) or were not receiving lacosamide before enrolment. Patients initiated IV lacosamide (2-12 mg/kg/day or 100-600 mg/day; 15-60 minutes infusion) as a replacement for oral lacosamide or as adjunctive treatment. The primary outcomes were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and discontinuations due to TEAEs.

Results: In total, 103 patients were enrolled and completed the trial; 55 patients were included in cohort 1 (≥8 to <17 years), 48 in cohort 2 (≥1 month to <8 years). During the 4 weeks before screening, 74 (71.8%) patients had focal seizures, 12 (11.7%) had generalized seizures, and two (1.9%) had unclassified seizures. Most patients (74 [71.8%]) initiated lacosamide as adjunctive IV treatment. The mean overall duration of exposure to IV lacosamide was 1.18 days. Seventy-nine (76.7%) patients had one IV lacosamide infusion, 20 (19.4%) had two, one (1.0%) had three, and three (2.9%) had 10 infusions. Overall, five (4.9%) patients had a total of seven TEAEs. The only TEAEs reported in two or more patients were increased blood triglycerides (two [1.9%]). No serious or severe TEAEs were reported, and no patients discontinued due to TEAEs. No TEAEs were considered drug-related by the investigator. No consistent or clinically relevant treatment-related changes from baseline were observed for hematology, clinical chemistry parameters, vital signs, or 12-lead electrocardiograms.

Significance: IV lacosamide was generally well tolerated in pediatric patients (≥1 month to <17 years) with epilepsy, and no new safety concerns were identified.

Keywords: antiseizure medication; focal seizure; intravenous lacosamide; pediatric; primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

Conflict of interest statement

Mark Kristof Farkas and Iryna Makedonska each report no conflicts of interest. Cynthia Beller, Ali Bozorg, Carrie McClung, Robert Roebling, Tanisia Yates, and Nancy Yuen are employees of UCB Pharma.

© 2022 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Number of infusions by cohort and overall (SS‐IV). SS‐IV, intravenous safety set

References

    1. Rogawski MA, Tofighy A, White HS, Matagne A, Wolff C. Current understanding of the mechanism of action of the antiepileptic drug lacosamide. Epilepsy Res. 2015;110:189–205.
    1. UCB Pharma . Vimpat® (lacosamide tablets, injection, oral solution) [US Prescribing Information]. Available at: . Accessed November 3, 2021.
    1. UCB Pharma . Vimpat® (lacosamide) EMA Summary of Product Characteristics. Available at: . Accessed November 3, 2021.
    1. Farkas V, Steinborn B, Flamini JR, Zhang Y, Yuen N, Borghs S, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide in pediatric patients with focal seizures. Neurology. 2019;93:e1212–e26.
    1. National Library of Medicine (U.S) . Efficacy and safety of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in subjects ≥1 month to <4 years with partial‐onset seizures. Identifier: NCT02477839. Available at:
    1. Ferreira JA, Le Pichon JB, Abdelmoity AT, Dilley D, Dedeken P, Daniels T, et al. Safety and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide in a pediatric population with focal seizures – an open‐label trial. Seizure. 2019;71:166–73.
    1. Fountain NB, Krauss G, Isojarvi J, Dilley D, Doty P, Rudd GD. Safety and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide intravenous loading dose in lacosamide‐naive patients with partial‐onset seizures. Epilepsia. 2013;54:58–65.
    1. Krauss G, Ben‐Menachem E, Mameniskiene R, Vaiciene‐Magistris N, Brock M, Whitesides JG, et al. Intravenous lacosamide as short‐term replacement for oral lacosamide in partial‐onset seizures. Epilepsia. 2010;51:951–7.
    1. Biton V, Rosenfeld WE, Whitesides J, Fountain NB, Vaiciene N, Rudd GD. Intravenous lacosamide as replacement for oral lacosamide in patients with partial‐onset seizures. Epilepsia. 2008;49:418–24.
    1. Arkilo D, Gustafson M, Ritter FJ. Clinical experience of intravenous lacosamide in infants and young children. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2016;20:212–7.
    1. Ngampoopun M, Suwanpakdee P, Jaisupa N, Nabangchang C. Effectiveness and adverse effect of intravenous lacosamide in nonconvulsive status epilepticus and acute repetitive seizures in children. Neurol Res Int. 2018;2018:8432859.
    1. Welsh SS, Lin N, Topjian AA, Abend NS. Safety of intravenous lacosamide in critically ill children. Seizure. 2017;52:76–80.
    1. Cawello W, Bonn R, Boekens H. Bioequivalence of intravenous and oral formulations of the antiepileptic drug lacosamide. Pharmacology. 2012;90:40–6.
    1. Winkler J, Schoemaker R, Stockis A. Modeling and simulation for the evaluation of dose adaptation rules of intravenous lacosamide in children. Epilepsy Res. 2019;149:13–6.
    1. Ortiz De La Rosa JS, Ladino LD, Rodríguez PJ, Rueda MC, Polanía JP, Castañeda AC. Efficacy of lacosamide in children and adolescents with drug‐resistant epilepsy and refractory status epilepticus: a systematic review. Seizure. 2018;56:34–40.
    1. Mintzer S, Dimova S, Zhang Y, Steiniger‐Brach B, De Backer M, Chellun D, et al. Effects of lacosamide and carbamazepine on lipids in a randomized trial. Epilepsia. 2020;61:2696–704.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera