Simulated physician learning program improves glucose control in adults with diabetes

JoAnn M Sperl-Hillen, Patrick J O'Connor, William A Rush, Paul E Johnson, Todd Gilmer, George Biltz, Stephen E Asche, Heidi L Ekstrom, JoAnn M Sperl-Hillen, Patrick J O'Connor, William A Rush, Paul E Johnson, Todd Gilmer, George Biltz, Stephen E Asche, Heidi L Ekstrom

Abstract

Objective: Inexpensive and standardized methods to deliver medical education to primary care physicians (PCPs) are desirable. Our objective was to assess the impact of an individualized simulated learning intervention on diabetes care provided by PCPs.

Research design and methods: Eleven clinics with 41 consenting PCPs in a Minnesota medical group were randomized to receive or not receive the learning intervention. Each intervention PCP was assigned 12 simulated type 2 diabetes cases that took about 15 min each to complete. Cases were designed to remedy specific physician deficits found in their electronic medical record observed practice patterns. General linear mixed models that accommodated the cluster randomized study design were used to assess patient-level change from preintervention to 12-month postintervention of A1C, blood pressure, and LDL cholesterol. The relationship between the study arm and the total of intervention and patient health care costs was also analyzed.

Results: Intervention clinic patients with baseline A1C >or=7% significantly improved glycemic control at the last postintervention A1C measurement, intervention effect of -0.19% mean A1C (P = 0.034) and +6.7% in A1C <7% goal achievement (P = 0.0099). Costs trended lower, with the cost per patient -$71 (SE = 142, P = 0.63) relative to nonintervention clinic patients. The intervention did not significantly improve blood pressure or LDL control. Models adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidity showed similar results. PCPs reported high satisfaction.

Conclusions: A brief individualized case-based simulated learning intervention for PCPs led to modest but significant glucose control improvement in adults with type 2 diabetes without increasing costs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00979823.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram illustrating allocation of clinics, PCPs, and diabetes patients to the two study arms. The diagram also shows the disposition of diabetes patients who were and were not included in the analysis. *Eligible PCPs worked >60% of a full time equivalent and had ≥10 patients with diabetes. **Patients were linked to the study-consented last-assigned PCP during the preintervention period and study-consented first-assigned PCP during the postintervention period. Patients lacking an assigned PCP were linked to the provider seen most during the study period. PCP, primary care physician.

References

    1. Forsetlund L, Bjorndal A, Rashidian A, Jamtvedt G, O'Brien MA, Wolf F. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(2):CD003030
    1. Davis D, Bordage G, Moores LK, Bennett N, Marinopoulos SS, Mazmanian PE. The science of continuing medical education: terms, tools, and gaps: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines. Chest 2009;135(Suppl. 3):8S–16S
    1. Wigton RS. Applications of judgment analysis and cognitive feedback to medicine. In Human Judgment: The SJT View. Brehmer B, Joyce CRB. Eds. Elsevier Science, New York, 1988, p. 227–245
    1. O'Brien MA, Rogers S, Jamtvedt G, Oxman AD, Odgaard-Jensen J, Kristoffersen DT. Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(4):CD000409
    1. Soumerai SB, McLaughlin TJ, Gurwitz JH, Guadagnoli E, Hauptman PJ, Borbas C, Morris N, McLaughlin B, Gao X, Willison DJ, Asinger R, Gobel F. Effect of local medical opinion leaders on quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998;279:1358–1363
    1. Solomon DH, Van Houten L, Glynn RJ, Baden L, Curtis K, Schrager H, Avorn J. Academic detailing to improve use of broad-spectrum antibiotics at an academic medical center. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:1897–1902
    1. Kelly JA, Murphy DA, Sikkema KJ, McAuliffe TL, Roffman RA, Solomon LJ, Winett RA, Kalichman SC. Randomised, controlled, community-level HIV-prevention intervention for sexual-risk behaviour among homosexual men in US cities. Community HIV Prevention Research Collaborative. Lancet 1997;350:1500–1505
    1. Wayne DB, Butter J, Siddall VJ, Fudala MJ, Linquist LA, Feinglass J, Wade LD, McGaghie WC. Simulation-based training of internal medicine residents in advanced cardiac life support protocols: a randomized trial. Teach Learn Med 2005;17:210–216
    1. Hudson P. Applying the lessons of high risk industries to health care. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12 (Suppl. 1):i7–i12
    1. Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, O'Leary KJ, Wayne DB. Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2009;37:2697–2701
    1. Chen PT, Huang YC, Cheng HW, Wang CC, Chan CY, Chan KH, Kuo CD. New simulation-based airway management training program for junior physicians: Advanced Airway Life Support. Med Teach 2009;31:e338–e344
    1. O'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Johnson PE, Rush WA, Asche SE, Dutta P, Biltz GR. Simulated physician learning intervention to improve safety and quality of diabetes care: a randomized trial. Diabetes Care 2009;32:585–590
    1. Dutta P, Biltz GR, Johnson PE, Sperl-Hillen JM, Rush WA, Duncan JE. SimCare: A simulation model to investigate physician decision-making in the care of patients with type 2 diabetes. In Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation. Henriksen K, Battles J, Lewin D, Marks E. Eds. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), 2005, p. 179–192
    1. Gilmer TP, O'Connor PJ, Rush WA, Crain AL, Whitebird RR, Hanson AM, Solberg LI. Predictors of health care costs in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005;28:59–64
    1. Kieszak SM, Flanders WD, Kosinski AS, Shipp CC, Karp H. A comparison of the Charlson comorbidity index derived from medical record data and administrative billing data. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:137–142
    1. Blough DK, Madden CW, Hornbrook MC. Modeling risk using generalized linear models. J Health Econ 1999;18:153–171
    1. Efron B. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York, NY, Chapman and Hall, 1993.
    1. O'Connor PJ. Electronic medical records and diabetes care improvement: are we waiting for Godot? Diabetes Care 2003;26:942–943
    1. Schmittdiel JA, Uratsu CS, Fireman BH, Selby JV. The effectiveness of diabetes care management in managed care. Am J Manag Care 2009;15:295–301
    1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, Hadden D, Turner RC, Holman RR. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000;321:405–412
    1. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA 2002;288:1909–1914
    1. Doria A, Wojcik J, Xu R, Gervino EV, Hauser TH, Johnstone MT, Nolan D, Hu FB, Warram JH. Interaction between poor glycemic control and 9p21 locus on risk of coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes. JAMA 2008;300:2389–2397
    1. Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, Goff DC, Jr, Bigger JT, Buse JB, Cushman WC, Genuth S, Ismail-Beigi F, Grimm RH, Jr, Probstfield JL, Simons-Morton DG, Friedewald WT. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2545–2559
    1. Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, Reda D, Emanuele N, Reaven PD, Zieve FJ, Marks J, Davis SN, Hayward R, Warren SR, Goldman S, McCarren M, Vitek ME, Henderson WG, Huang GD: VADT Investigators. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2009;360:129–139
    1. Sperl-Hillen JM, O'Connor PJ. Factors driving diabetes care improvement in a large medical group: ten years of progress. Am J Manag Care 2005;11(Suppl. 5):S177–S185

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera