Feasibility and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Peer-Developed and Virtually Delivered Community Mental Health Training Program (Emotional CPR): Pre-Post Study

Amanda L Myers, Caroline Collins-Pisano, Joelle C Ferron, Karen L Fortuna, Amanda L Myers, Caroline Collins-Pisano, Joelle C Ferron, Karen L Fortuna

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a global mental health crisis, highlighting the need for a focus on community-wide mental health. Emotional CPR (eCPR) is a program and practice developed by persons with a lived experience of recovery from trauma or mental health challenges to train community members from diverse backgrounds to support others through mental health crises. eCPR trainers have found that eCPR may promote feelings of belonging by increasing supportive behaviors toward individuals with mental health problems. Thus, clinical outcomes related to positive and negative affect would improve along with feelings of loneliness.

Objective: This study examined the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of eCPR.

Methods: We employed a pre-post design with 151 individuals, including peer support specialists, service users, clinicians, family members, and nonprofit leaders, who participated in virtual eCPR trainings between April 20, 2020, and July 31, 2020. Instruments were administered before and after training and included the Herth Hope Scale; Empowerment Scale; Flourishing Scale (perceived capacity to support individuals); Mindful Attention Awareness Scale; Active-Empathic Listening Scale (supportive behaviors toward individuals with mental health challenges); Social Connectedness Scale (feelings of belonging and connection with others); Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; and University of California, Los Angeles 3-item Loneliness Scale (symptoms and emotions). The eCPR fidelity scale was used to determine the feasibility of delivering eCPR with fidelity. We conducted 2-tailed paired t tests to examine posttraining improvements related to each scale. Additionally, data were stratified to identify pre-post differences by role.

Results: Findings indicate that it is feasible for people with a lived experience of a mental health condition to develop a program and train people to deliver eCPR with fidelity. Statistically significant pre-post changes were found related to one's ability to identify emotions, support others in distress, communicate nonverbally, share emotions, and take care of oneself, as well as to one's feelings of social connectedness, self-perceived flourishing, and positive affect (P≤.05). Findings indicated promising evidence of pre-post improvements (not statistically significant) related to loneliness, empowerment, active-empathetic listening, mindfulness awareness, and hope. Nonprofit leaders and workers demonstrated the greatest improvements related to loneliness, social connectedness, empathic listening, and flourishing. Peer support specialists demonstrated the greatest improvements related to positive affect, and clinicians demonstrated the greatest improvements related to mindfulness awareness.

Conclusions: Promising evidence indicates that eCPR, a peer-developed and peer-delivered program, may increase feelings of belonging while increasing supportive behaviors toward individuals with mental health problems and improving clinical outcomes related to positive and negative affect and feelings of loneliness.

Keywords: Emotional CPR (eCPR); community mental health; mental health; peer support; peer-delivered training.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: KLF owns Social Wellness, LLC and is contracted by Trusst Health Inc and Inquisithealth Inc. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

©Amanda L Myers, Caroline Collins-Pisano, Joelle C Ferron, Karen L Fortuna. Originally published in Journal of Participatory Medicine (http://jopm.jmir.org), 04.03.2021.

References

    1. Coronavirus in the US: Latest Map and Case Count. The New York Times. 2021. [2021-03-01]. .
    1. Bao Y, Sun Y, Meng S, Shi J, Lu L. 2019-nCoV epidemic: address mental health care to empower society. Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):e37–e38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30309-3.
    1. Panchal N, Kamal R, Cox C, Garfield R. The implications of COVID-19 for mental health and substance use. Kaiser Family Foundation. 2021. Feb 10, [2021-02-26].
    1. Gunnell D, Appleby L, Arensman E, Hawton K, John A, Kapur N, Khan M, O'Connor RC, Pirkis J, Appleby L, Arensman E, Caine ED, Chan LF, Chang S, Chen Y, Christensen H, Dandona R, Eddleston M, Erlangsen A, Gunnell D, Harkavy-Friedman J, Hawton K, John A, Kapur N, Khan M, Kirtley OJ, Knipe D, Konradsen F, Liu S, McManus S, Mehlum L, Miller M, Moran P, Morrissey J, Moutier C, Niederkrotenthaler T, Nordentoft M, O'Connor RC, O'Neill S, Page A, Phillips MR, Pirkis J, Platt S, Pompili M, Qin P, Rezaeian M, Silverman M, Sinyor M, Stack S, Townsend E, Turecki G, Vijayakumar L, Yip PS. Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):468–471. doi: 10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30171-1.
    1. Lake J. The mental health pandemic calls for a strategic initiative that emphasizes integrative health care. Psychiatric Times. 2020. Oct 27, [2021-02-26]. .
    1. Hadlaczky G, Hökby S, Mkrtchian A, Carli V, Wasserman D. Mental Health First Aid is an effective public health intervention for improving knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour: a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 19;26(4):467–75. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2014.924910.
    1. Kitchener B, Jorm AF. Mental health first aid training: review of evaluation studies. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;40(1):6–8. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01735.x.
    1. Fortuna KL, Barr P, Goldstein C, Walker R, Brewer L, Zagaria A, Bartels S. Application of Community-Engaged Research to Inform the Development and Implementation of a Peer-Delivered Mobile Health Intervention for Adults With Serious Mental Illness. J Particip Med. 2019 Mar 19;11(1):e12380. doi: 10.2196/12380.
    1. Principles of community engagement: Second edition. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011. [2021-02-26]. .
    1. Committee on National Statistics; Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Health and Medicine Division; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Washington D.C: National Academies Press; 2016. Measuring Recovery from Substance Use or Mental Disorders: Workshop Summary; pp. 19–22.
    1. Fortuna KL, DiMilia PR, Lohman MC, Bruce ML, Zubritsky CD, Halaby MR, Walker RM, Brooks JM, Bartels SJ. Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Peer-Delivered and Technology Supported Self-Management Intervention for Older Adults with Serious Mental Illness. Psychiatr Q. 2018 Jun 26;89(2):293–305. doi: 10.1007/s11126-017-9534-7.
    1. Rogers E, Chamberlin J, Ellison ML, Crean T. A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Aug;48(8):1042–7. doi: 10.1176/ps.48.8.1042.
    1. Rogers ES, Ralph RO, Salzer MS. Validating the empowerment scale with a multisite sample of consumers of mental health services. Psychiatr Serv. 2010 Sep;61(9):933–6. doi: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.9.933.
    1. Herth K. Abbreviated instrument to measure hope: development and psychometric evaluation. J Adv Nurs. 1992 Oct;17(10):1251–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01843.x.
    1. Diener E, Wirtz D, Tov W, Kim-Prieto C, Choi D, Oishi S, Biswas-Diener R. New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings. Soc Indic Res. 2009 May 28;97(2):143–156. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y.
    1. Schotanus-Dijkstra M, Ten Klooster PM, Drossaert CHC, Pieterse ME, Bolier L, Walburg JA, Bohlmeijer ET. Validation of the Flourishing Scale in a sample of people with suboptimal levels of mental well-being. BMC Psychol. 2016 Mar 17;4(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40359-016-0116-5.
    1. Carlson LE, Brown KW. Validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in a cancer population. J Psychosom Res. 2005 Jan;58(1):29–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.04.366.
    1. Bodie GD. The Active-Empathic Listening Scale (AELS): Conceptualization and Evidence of Validity Within the Interpersonal Domain. Commun Q. 2011 Jul;59(3):277–295. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2011.583495.
    1. Lee RM, Draper M, Lee S. Social connectedness, dysfunctional interpersonal behaviors, and psychological distress: Testing a mediator model. J Counseling Psychol. 2001;48(3):310–318. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.48.3.310.
    1. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
    1. Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies. Res Aging. 2004 Aug 19;26(6):655–672. doi: 10.1177/0164027504268574.
    1. IBM SPSS statistics for mac computer software. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2020.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera