High-dose sequential chemotherapy (HDS) versus PEB chemotherapy as first-line treatment of patients with poor prognosis germ-cell tumors: mature results of an Italian randomized phase II study

A Necchi, L Mariani, M Di Nicola, S Lo Vullo, N Nicolai, P Giannatempo, D Raggi, E Farè, M Magni, L Piva, P Matteucci, M Catanzaro, D Biasoni, T Torelli, S Stagni, C Bengala, C Barone, I Schiavetto, S Siena, C Carlo-Stella, G Pizzocaro, R Salvioni, A M Gianni, A Necchi, L Mariani, M Di Nicola, S Lo Vullo, N Nicolai, P Giannatempo, D Raggi, E Farè, M Magni, L Piva, P Matteucci, M Catanzaro, D Biasoni, T Torelli, S Stagni, C Bengala, C Barone, I Schiavetto, S Siena, C Carlo-Stella, G Pizzocaro, R Salvioni, A M Gianni

Abstract

Background: In the late 1990s, the use of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and stem-cell rescue held promise for patients with advanced and poor prognosis germ-cell tumors (GCT). We started a randomized phase II trial to assess the efficacy of sequential HDCT compared with cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (PEB).

Patients and methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive four cycles of PEB every 3 weeks or two cycles of PEB followed by a high-dose sequence (HDS) comprising HD-cyclophosphamide (7.0 g/m(2)), 2 courses of cisplatin and HD-etoposide (2.4 g/m(2)) with stem-cell support, and a single course of HD-carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC) 27 mg/ml × min] with autologous stem-cell transplant. Postchemotherapy surgery was planned on responding residual disease in both arms. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The study was designed to detect a 30% improvement of 5-year PFS (from 40% to 70%), with 80% power and two-sided α at 5%.

Results: From December 1996 to March 2007, 85 patients were randomized: 43 in PEB and 42 in HDS arm. Median follow-up was 114.2 months [interquartile range (IQR): 87.7-165.8]. Complete or partial response with normal markers (PRm-) were obtained in 28 (65.1%) and 29 (69.1%) patients, respectively. Five-year PFS was 55.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 42.8-72.8] and 54.8% (95% CI 41.6%-72.1%) in PEB and HDS arm, respectively (log-rank test P = 0.726). Five-year overall survival was 62.8% (95% CI 49.9-79.0) and 59.3% (95% CI 46.1-76.3). One toxic death (PEB arm) was recorded.

Conclusions: The study failed to meet the primary end point. Furthermore, survival estimates of conventional-dose chemotherapy higher than expected should be accounted for and will likely limit further improvements in the first-line setting. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT02161692.

Keywords: germ-cell cancer; high-dose chemotherapy; poor prognosis; testicular neoplasms; transplantation.

© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera