A randomized, controlled, repeat-dose study of batefenterol/fluticasone furoate compared with placebo in the treatment of COPD

Courtney Crim, Mark Gotfried, Selwyn Spangenthal, Michael Watkins, Amanda Emmett, Catriona Crawford, Charlotte Baidoo, Ramiro Castro-Santamaria, Courtney Crim, Mark Gotfried, Selwyn Spangenthal, Michael Watkins, Amanda Emmett, Catriona Crawford, Charlotte Baidoo, Ramiro Castro-Santamaria

Abstract

Background: Batefenterol (BAT) is a bi-functional molecule with both muscarinic antagonist and β2-adrenoceptor agonist pharmacology. This Phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study evaluated the safety and tolerability of BAT 300 μg with fluticasone furoate (FF) 100 μg administered via the ELLIPTA inhaler (BAT/FF 300/100).

Methods: Subjects with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were randomized 2:1 to receive BAT/FF 300/100 or placebo once daily for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 0-4-h weighted mean (WM) heart rate (HR, measured by electrocardiogram [ECG]) on Day 42. Other endpoints included WM and maximum 0-4-h corrected QT interval (ECG on Days 1, 28, and 42), HR measured by Holter monitoring (Day 42), and standard safety assessments. Study protocol was approved by an Investigational Review Board.

Results: Sixty-two patients were randomized and received ≥1 dose of study medication (BAT/FF 300/100 n = 42; placebo n = 20). Mean age was 62.5 years (standard deviation [SD] 8.17). Study completion rates were 83% (BAT/FF 300/100) and 100% (placebo). Screening mean (SD) post-bronchodilator percentage-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 57.57 (11.42) in the BAT/FF 300/100 group and 55.68 (14.03) in the placebo group. BAT/FF 300/100 was non-inferior to placebo for the primary endpoint, treatment difference: - 2.2 beats per minute (bpm), 95% confidence interval [CI]: - 6.2, 1.7). There were no clinically relevant differences between treatment groups in WM or maximum 0-4-h corrected QT interval, or mean HR based on Holter monitoring on Day 42 (BAT/FF 300/100: 76.3 bpm [SD 11.38]; placebo: 84.8 bpm [SD 9.87]). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 38% (BAT/FF 300/100) and 35% (placebo) of patients. AEs in ≥2 subjects with BAT/FF 300/100 were dysgeusia (10%), diarrhea (7%), nasopharyngitis (7%), and cough (5%). AEs leading to discontinuation occurred in two subjects who received BAT/FF 300/100: post-treatment severe pneumonia (serious AE) and non-serious AEs of moderate vomiting and severe gastroenteritis; both were not considered drug-related. No deaths occurred.

Conclusions: Six weeks of BAT/FF 300/100 treatment was non-inferior to placebo for change from baseline in HR, with no new clinically relevant general or cardiovascular safety signals.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02573870 (submitted October 12, 2015).

Keywords: Bi-functional molecule; Bronchodilator; Safety; Triple therapy.

Conflict of interest statement

CB, RC-S, C Crim, C Crawford and MW are employees of, and hold shares, in GSK. AE is a former employee of, and holds shares in, GSK. MG has participated in speakers’ bureau for GSK, and has received grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Sunvovion, AstraZeneca, Theravance, Pearl, and Chiesi. SS has received personal fees from GSK in connection with participation in a speakers’ bureau.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design (a) and participant flow diagram (b). BAT/FF, batefenterol/fluticasone furoate; PRN, Pro re nata (when necessary); QD, once daily; V, visit
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
LS mean change from baseline in 0–4-h WM HR (bpm). BAT/FF 300/100, batefenterol/fluticasone furoate 300/100 μg; bpm, beats per minute; HR, heart rate; LS, least squares; WM, weighted mean
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
WM and maximum QTc(F) change from baseline to Day 42 (MMRM analyses). BAT/FF 300/100, batefenterol/fluticasone furoate 300/100 μg; QTc(F), QT interval corrected by Fridericia’s method; MMRM, mixed models repeated measures; WM, weighted mean
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
LS mean change from baseline in trough FEV1. BAT/FF 300/100, batefenterol/fluticasone furoate 300/100 μg; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; LS, least squares

References

    1. Celli BR, MacNee W, Force AET. Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper. Eur Respir J. 2004;23:932–946. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00014304.
    1. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD. . Accessed 9 Aug 2017.
    1. Cazzola M, Molimard M. The scientific rationale for combining long-acting beta2-agonists and muscarinic antagonists in COPD. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2010;23:257–267. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2010.03.003.
    1. Fabbri LM, Roversi S, Beghe B. Triple therapy for symptomatic patients with COPD. Lancet. 2017;389:1864–1865. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30567-6.
    1. Singh D, Vestbo J. Triple therapy in COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196:1082–1083. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201704-0811LE.
    1. Ambery C, Riddell K, Daley-Yates P. Open-label, randomized, 6-way crossover, single-dose study to determine the pharmacokinetics of Batefenterol (GSK961081) and fluticasone Furoate when administered alone or in combination. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2016;5:399–407. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.274.
    1. Hughes AD, Jones LH. Dual-pharmacology muscarinic antagonist and beta (2) agonist molecules for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Future Med Chem. 2011;3:1585–1605. doi: 10.4155/fmc.11.106.
    1. Cazzola M, Lopez-Campos JL, Puente-Maestu L. The MABA approach: a new option to improve bronchodilator therapy. Eur Respir J. 2013;42:885–887. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00067013.
    1. Gershon A, Croxford R, Calzavara A, To T. Stanbrook MB, Upshur R, et al. Cardiovascular safety of inhaled long-acting bronchodilators in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1175–1185. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1016.
    1. Salpeter SR. Cardiovascular safety of beta (2)-adrenoceptor agonist use in patients with obstructive airway disease: a systematic review. Drugs Aging. 2004;21:405–414. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200421060-00005.
    1. Au DH, Curtis JR, Every NR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD. Association between inhaled beta-agonists and the risk of unstable angina and myocardial infarction. Chest. 2002;121:846–851. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.3.846.
    1. Corrao S, Brunori G, Lupo U, Perticone F. Effectiveness and safety of concurrent beta-blockers and inhaled bronchodilators in COPD with cardiovascular comorbidities. Eur Respir Rev. 2017;26:160123. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0123-2016.
    1. Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, Culver BH, et al. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J. 2012;40:1324–1343. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00080312.
    1. Wielders PL, Ludwig-Sengpiel A, Locantore N, Baggen S, Chan R, Riley JH. A new class of bronchodilator improves lung function in COPD: a trial with GSK961081. Eur Respir J. 2013;42:972–981. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00165712.
    1. Norris V, Zhu C-Q, Ambery C. The pharmacodynamics of GSK961081 in patients with COPD. European Respiratory Society meeting, Amsterdam 2011. Abstract number 832.
    1. Xia N, Wang H, Nie X. Inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists do not increase fatal cardiovascular adverse events in COPD: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0137904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137904.
    1. Calverley PM, Anderson JA, Celli B, Ferguson GT, Jenkins C, Jones PW, et al. Cardiovascular events in patients with COPD: TORCH study results. Thorax. 2010;65:719–725. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.136077.
    1. Brook RD, Anderson JA, Calverley PM, Celli BR, Crim C, Denvir MA, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes with an inhaled beta2-agonist/corticosteroid in patients with COPD at high cardiovascular risk. Heart. 2017;103:1536–1542. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310897.
    1. Tashkin DP, Leimer I, Metzdorf N, Decramer M. Cardiac safety of tiotropium in patients with cardiac events: a retrospective analysis of the UPLIFT(R) trial. Respir Res. 2015;16:65. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0216-4.
    1. Calzetta L, Rogliani P, Matera MG, Cazzola M. A systematic review with meta-analysis of dual Bronchodilation with LAMA/LABA for the treatment of stable COPD. Chest. 2016;149:1181–1196. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.646.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera