COVID-19 Modifications for Remote Teleassessment and Teletraining of a Complementary Alternative Medicine Intervention for People With Multiple Sclerosis: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Byron Lai, Chia-Ying Chiu, Emily Pounds, Tracy Tracy, Tapan Mehta, Hui-Ju Young, Emily Riser, James Rimmer, Byron Lai, Chia-Ying Chiu, Emily Pounds, Tracy Tracy, Tapan Mehta, Hui-Ju Young, Emily Riser, James Rimmer

Abstract

Background: Access to comprehensive exercise and rehabilitation services for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) remains a major challenge, especially in rural, low-income areas. Hence, the Tele-Exercise and Multiple Sclerosis (TEAMS) study aims to provide patient-centered, coordinated care by implementing a 12-week complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) intervention for adults with MS. However, due to the societal impact of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in mid-March 2020, the University of Alabama at Birmingham announced a limited business model halting all nonessential research requiring on-site visits, which includes the TEAMS study.

Objective: In compliance with the shelter-in-place policy and quarantine guidance, a modified testing and training protocol was developed to allow participants to continue the study.

Methods: The modified protocol, which replaces on-site data collection and training procedures, includes a teleassessment package (computer tablet, blood pressure cuff, hand dynamometer, mini disc cone, measuring tape, an 8" step, and a large-print 8" × 11" paper with ruler metrics and wall-safe tape) and a virtual meeting platform for synchronous interactive training between the therapist and the participant. The teleassessment measures include resting blood pressure and heart rate, grip strength, Five Times Sit to Stand, Timed Up & Go, and the Berg Balance Scale. The teletraining component includes 20 sessions of synchronous training sessions of dual tasking, yoga, and Pilates exercises designed and customized for a range of functional levels. Teletraining lasts 12 weeks and participants are instructed to continue exercising for a posttraining period of 9 months.

Results: The protocol modifications were supported with supplemental funding (from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute) and approved by the University Institutional Review Board for Human Use. At the time nonessential research visits were halted by the university, there were 759 people enrolled and baseline tested, accounting for 92.5% of our baseline testing completion target (N=820). Specifically, 325 participants completed the 12-week intervention and follow-up testing visits, and 289 participants needed to complete either the intervention or follow-up assessments. A modified analysis plan will include sensitivity analyses to ensure the robustness of the study results in the presence of uncertainty and protocol deviations. Study results are projected to be published in 2021.

Conclusions: This modified remote teleassessment/teletraining protocol will impact a large number of participants with MS who would otherwise have been discontinued from the study.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03117881; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03117881.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/18415.

Keywords: COVID-19; disability; multiple sclerosis; physical activity; tele-exercise; telehealth; telerehabilitation; teletraining.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Byron Lai, Chia-Ying Chiu, Emily Pounds, Tracy Tracy, Tapan Mehta, Hui-Ju Young, Emily Riser, James Rimmer. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 03.07.2020.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An example of a person with multiple sclerosis exercising in their home with the intervention equipment and computer tablet.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An example of the videoconference view of the starting position for the Five Times Sit to Stand test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
An example of the videoconference view for the Timed Up & Go test.
Figure 4
Figure 4
An example of the videoconference view for the starting position of the functional reach task of the Berg Balance Scale.
Figure 5
Figure 5
A teleassessment package prior to being shipped to a participant's home. The equipment includes an 8" step, a blood pressure cuff, a roll of wall-safe tape, a 3-meter measuring tape, a hand dynamometer, a mini disc cone, a large print paper with ruler metrics, a sheet with participant instructions (under the step), and a computer laptop (bottom).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Modified CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) diagram reporting the number of teleassessments that need to be completed and participants who need to undergo rDirectCAM. COVID-19: coronavirus disease.

References

    1. Wallin Mt, Culpepper Wj, Nichols E, Bhutta Za, Gebrehiwot Tt, Hay Si, Khalil Ia, Krohn Kj, Liang X, Naghavi M, Mokdad Ah, Nixon Mr, Reiner Rc, Sartorius B, Smith M, Topor-Madry R, Werdecker A, Vos T, Feigin Vl, Murray Cjl. Global, regional, and national burden of multiple sclerosis 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology. 2019 Mar;18(3):269–285. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30443-5.
    1. Trapp Bruce D, Nave Klaus-Armin. Multiple sclerosis: an immune or neurodegenerative disorder? Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008 Dec;31(6):247–69. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094313.
    1. Amatya B, Galea MP, Kesselring J, Khan F. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation interventions in persons with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015 Jul;4(4):358–69. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.06.011.
    1. Rintala A, Hakala S, Paltamaa J, Heinonen A, Karvanen J, Sjögren Tuulikki. Effectiveness of technology-based distance physical rehabilitation interventions on physical activity and walking in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Feb 15;40(4):373–387. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1260649.
    1. Robb JF, Hyland MH, Goodman AD. Comparison of telemedicine versus in-person visits for persons with multiple sclerosis: A randomized crossover study of feasibility, cost, and satisfaction. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Nov;36:101258. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.05.001.
    1. Bove R, Garcha P, Bevan CJ, Crabtree-Hartman E, Green AJ, Gelfand JM. Clinic to in-home telemedicine reduces barriers to care for patients with MS or other neuroimmunologic conditions. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2018 Nov;5(6):e505. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000505.
    1. Razazian N, Kazeminia M, Moayedi H, Daneshkhah A, Shohaimi S, Mohammadi M, Jalali R, Salari N. The impact of physical exercise on the fatigue symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. 2020 Mar 13;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01654-y.
    1. Motl RW, Gosney JL. Effect of exercise training on quality of life in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Mult Scler. 2008 Jan;14(1):129–35. doi: 10.1177/1352458507080464.
    1. Ensari I, Motl RW, Pilutti LA. Exercise training improves depressive symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis: results of a meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2014 Jun;76(6):465–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.03.014.
    1. Platta ME, Ensari I, Motl RW, Pilutti LA. Effect of Exercise Training on Fitness in Multiple Sclerosis: A Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Sep;97(9):1564–1572. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.01.023.
    1. Jennett PA, Affleck Hall L, Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Anderson C, Thomas R, Young B, Lorenzetti D, Scott RE. The socio-economic impact of telehealth: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2003 Oct 13;9(6):311–20. doi: 10.1258/135763303771005207.
    1. Rimmer James H, Thirumalai Mohanraj, Young Hui-Ju, Pekmezi Dori, Tracy Tracy, Riser Emily, Mehta Tapan. Rationale and design of the tele-exercise and multiple sclerosis (TEAMS) study: A comparative effectiveness trial between a clinic- and home-based telerehabilitation intervention for adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) living in the deep south. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Aug;71(6):186–193. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.05.016.
    1. Thirumalai M, Rimmer JH, Johnson G, Wilroy J, Young H, Mehta T, Lai B. TEAMS (Tele-Exercise and Multiple Sclerosis), a Tailored Telerehabilitation mHealth App: Participant-Centered Development and Usability Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 May 24;6(5):e10181. doi: 10.2196/10181.
    1. Guclu-Gunduz A, Citaker S, Nazliel B, Irkec C. Upper extremity function and its relation with hand sensation and upper extremity strength in patients with multiple sclerosis. NRE. 2012 Jun 01;30(4):369–374. doi: 10.3233/nre-2012-0768.
    1. Fry DK, Pfalzer LA. Reliability of Four Functional Tests and Rating of Perceived Exertion in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis. Physiotherapy Canada. 2006 Jul;58(3):212–220. doi: 10.3138/ptc.58.3.212.
    1. Kalron A, Dolev M, Givon U. Further construct validity of the Timed Up-and-Go Test as a measure of ambulation in multiple sclerosis patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):841–847. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04599-3.
    1. Sebastião Emerson, Sandroff BM, Learmonth YC, Motl RW. Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test as a Measure of Functional Mobility in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jul;97(7):1072–7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.031.
    1. Learmonth YC, Paul L, McFadyen AK, Mattison P, Miller L. Reliability and clinical significance of mobility and balance assessments in multiple sclerosis. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2012;35(1):69–74. doi: 10.1097/mrr.0b013e328350b65f.
    1. Cattaneo D, Regola A, Meotti M. Validity of six balance disorders scales in persons with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Jun 30;28(12):789–95. doi: 10.1080/09638280500404289.
    1. Cattaneo D, Jonsdottir J, Repetti S. Reliability of four scales on balance disorders in persons with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Dec 30;29(24):1920–5. doi: 10.1080/09638280701191859.
    1. Venkataraman Kavita, Morgan Michelle, Amis Kristopher A, Landerman Lawrence R, Koh Gerald C, Caves Kevin, Hoenig Helen. Tele-Assessment of the Berg Balance Scale: Effects of Transmission Characteristics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Apr;98(4):659–664.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.10.019.
    1. Downs S, Marquez J, Chiarelli P. The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: a systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy. 2013 Jun;59(2):93–99. doi: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9.
    1. Mohr DC, Cuijpers P, Lehman K. Supportive accountability: a model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Mar 10;13(1):e30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1602.
    1. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2016 Jun;15(2):155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera