Feasibility of the Enhancing Participation In the Community by improving Wheelchair Skills (EPIC Wheels) program: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Edward M Giesbrecht, William C Miller, Janice J Eng, Ian M Mitchell, Roberta L Woodgate, Charles H Goldsmith, Edward M Giesbrecht, William C Miller, Janice J Eng, Ian M Mitchell, Roberta L Woodgate, Charles H Goldsmith

Abstract

Background: Many older adults rely on a manual wheelchair for mobility but typically receive little, if any, training on how to use their wheelchair effectively and independently. Standardized skill training is an effective intervention, but limited access to clinician trainers is a substantive barrier. Enhancing Participation in the Community by Improving Wheelchair Skills (EPIC Wheels) is a 1-month monitored home training program for improving mobility skills in older novice manual wheelchair users, integrating principles from andragogy and social cognitive theory. The purpose of this study is to determine whether feasibility indicators and primary clinical outcome measures of the EPIC Wheels program are sufficiently robust to justify conducting a subsequent multi-site randomized controlled trial.

Methods: A 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial at two sites will compare improvement in wheelchair mobility skills between an EPIC Wheels treatment group and a computer-game control group, with additional wheelchair use introduced as a second factor. A total of 40 community-dwelling manual wheelchair users at least 55 years old and living in two Canadian metropolitan cities (n = 20 × 2) will be recruited. Feasibility indicators related to study process, resources, management, and treatment issues will be collected during data collection and at the end of the study period, and evaluated against proposed criteria. Clinical outcome measures will be collected at baseline (pre-randomization) and post-intervention. The primary clinical outcome measure is wheelchair skill capacity, as determined by the Wheelchair Skills Test, version 4.1. Secondary clinical outcome measures include wheelchair skill safety, satisfaction with performance, wheelchair confidence, life-space mobility, divided-attention, and health-related quality of life.

Discussion: The EPIC Wheels training program offers several innovative features. The convenient, portable, economical, and adaptable tablet-based, home program model for wheelchair skills training has great potential for clinical uptake and opportunity for future enhancements. Theory-driven design can foster learning and adherence for older adults. Establishing the feasibility of the study protocol and estimating effect size for the primary clinical outcome measure will be used to develop a multi-site randomized controlled trial to test the guiding hypotheses.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials NCT01740635.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial procedure.

References

    1. Cranswick K, Dosman D. Eldercare: What We Know Today. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2008. Catalogue no. 11–008.
    1. Statistics Canada. Participation and Activity Limitation Survey 2006: Labour Force Experience of People with Disabilities in Canada. Ottawa; 2008. Catalogue no. 89-628-X.
    1. Shields M. Use of wheelchairs and other mobility support devices. Health Rep. 2004;15:37–41.
    1. Mann WC, Llanes C, Justiss MD, Tomita M. Frail older adults’ self-report of their most important assistive device. Occup Ther J Res. 2004;24:4–12.
    1. Finlayson M, van Denend T. Experiencing the loss of mobility: perspectives of older adults with MS. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:1168–1180. doi: 10.1080/09638280310001596180.
    1. Simpson RC, LoPresti EF, Cooper RA. How many people would benefit from a smart wheelchair? J Rehabil Res Develop. 2008;45:53–72. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2007.01.0015.
    1. Laliberte Rudman D, Hebert D, Reid D. Living in a restricted occupational world: the occupational experiences of stroke survivors who are wheelchair users and their caregivers. Can J Occup Ther. 2006;73:141–152.
    1. Kirby RL, Mifflen NJ, Thibault DL, Smith C, Best KL, Thompson KJ, MacLeod DA. The manual wheelchair-handling skills of caregivers and the effect of training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:2011–2019. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.014.
    1. Kirby RL, Ackroyd-Stolarz SA, Brown MG, Kirkland SA, MacLeod DA. Wheelchair-related accidents caused by tips and falls among noninstitutionalized users of manually propelled wheelchairs in Nova Scotia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;73:319–330. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199409000-00004.
    1. Gavin-Dreschnack D, Nelson A, Fitzgerald S, Harrow J, Sanchez-Anguiano A, Ahmed S, Powell-Cope G. Wheelchair-related falls: current evidence and directions for improved quality care. J Nurs Care Qual. 2005;20:119–127. doi: 10.1097/00001786-200504000-00006.
    1. Kirby RL. Wheelchair Skills Program Version 4.1. [ ]
    1. Coolen AL, Kirby RL, Landry J, MacPhee AH, Dupuis D, Smith C, Best KL, MacKenzie DE, MacLeod DA. Wheelchair skills training program for clinicians: a randomized controlled trial with occupational therapy students. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1160–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.10.019.
    1. Kirby RL, Dupuis DJ, Macphee AH, Coolen AL, Smith C, Best KL, Newton AM, Mountain AD, MacLeod DA, Bonaparte JP. The Wheelchair Skills Test (version 2.4): measurement properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:794–804. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.07.007.
    1. MacPhee AH, Kirby RL, Coolen AL, Smith C, MacLeod DA, Dupuis DJ. Wheelchair skills training program: a randomized clinical trial of wheelchair users undergoing initial rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:41–50.
    1. Best KL, Kirby RL, Smith C, MacLeod DA. Wheelchair skills training for community-based manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:2316–2323. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.07.300.
    1. Ozturk A, Ucsular FD. Effectiveness of a wheelchair skills training programme for community-living users of manual wheelchairs in Turkey: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25:416–424. doi: 10.1177/0269215510386979.
    1. Karmarkar AM, Collins DM, Kelleher A, Ding D, Oyster M, Cooper RA. Manual wheelchair-related mobility characteristics of older adults in nursing homes. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:428–437. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2010.481346.
    1. Smith C, Kirby RL. Manual wheelchair skills capacity and safety of residents of a long-term care facility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:663–669. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.024.
    1. Garber SL, Bunzel R, Monga TN. Wheelchair utilization and satisfaction following cerebral vascular accident. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;39:521–534.
    1. Ganesh S, Hayter A, Kim J, Sanford J, Sprigle S, Hoenig H. Wheelchair use by veterans newly prescribed a manual wheelchair. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:434–439. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.045.
    1. Gill TM, Baker DI, Gottschalk M, Peduzzi PN, Allore H, Byers A. A program to prevent functional decline in physically frail, elderly persons who live at home. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1068–1074. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020423.
    1. Tousignant M, Dubuc N, Hebert R, Coulombe C. Home-care programmes for older adults with disabilities in Canada: how can we assess the adequacy of services provided compared with the needs of users? Health Soc Care Community. 2007;15:1–7.
    1. Sanford JA, Griffiths PC, Richardson P, Hargraves K, Butterfield T, Hoenig H. The effects of in-home rehabilitation on task self efficacy in mobility-impaired adults: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:1641–1648. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00913.x.
    1. Tousignant M, Boissy P, Corriveau H, Moffet H. In home telerehabilitation for older adults after discharge from an acute hospital or rehabilitation unit: a proof-of-concept study and costs estimation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006;1:209–216. doi: 10.1080/17483100600776965.
    1. Layne JE, Sampson SE, Mallio CJ, Hibberd PL, Griffith JL, Das SK, Flanagan WH, Castaneda-Sceppa C. Successful dissemination of a community-based strength training program for older adults by peer and professional leaders: the people exercising program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:2323–2329. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02010.x.
    1. Jette AM, Rooks D, Lachman M, Lin TH, Levenson C, Heislein D, Giorgetti MM, Harris BA. Home-based resistance training: predictors of participation and adherence. Gerontologist. 1998;38:412–421. doi: 10.1093/geront/38.4.412.
    1. Hoenig H, Sanford JA, Butterfield T, Griffiths PC, Richardson P, Hargraves K. Development of a teletechnology protocol for in-home rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Develop. 2006;43:287–298. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2004.07.0089.
    1. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, Gardner MM, Norton RN, Tilyard MW, Buchner DM. Randomised controlled trial of a general practice programme of home based exercise to prevent falls in elderly women. BMJ. 1997;315:1065–1069. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7115.1065.
    1. Tinetti ME, Baker DI, McAvay G, Claus EB, Garrett P, Gottschalk M, Koch ML, Trainor K, Horwitz RI. A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:821–827. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199409293311301.
    1. Jordan JL, Holden MA, Mason EE, Foster NE. Interventions to improve adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:CD005956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005956.pub2.
    1. Aarhus R, Gronvall E, Larsen SB, Wollsen S. Turning training into play: embodied gaming, seniors, physical training and motivation. Gerontechnology. 2011;10:110–120.
    1. Merriam SB. Andragogy and self-directed learning: pillars of adult learning theory. New Dir Adult Cont Educ. 2001;89:3–13.
    1. Shaughnessy M, Resnick BM. Using theory to develop an exercise intervention for patients post stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16:140–146. doi: 10.1310/tsr1602-140.
    1. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: WH Freeman and Company; 1997.
    1. Knowles MS. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. New York: The Adult Education Company; 1980.
    1. Altman DG. Comparability of randomised groups. Statistician. 1985;34:125–136. doi: 10.2307/2987510.
    1. Montgomery MM, Peters TJ, Little P. Design, analysis and presentation of factorial randomised controlled trials. BMC Med Res Method. 2003;3:26–30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-26.
    1. Beaton DE, Boers M, Wells GA. Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002;14:109–114. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200203000-00006.
    1. Cress ME, Buchner DM, Prohaska T, Rimmer J, Brown M, Macera C, Dipietro L, Chodzko-Zajko W. Best practices for physical activity programs and behavior counseling in older adult populations. J Aging Phys Act. 2005;13:61–74.
    1. Alon G, Sunnerhagen KS, Geurts AC, Ohry A. A home-based, self-administered stimulation program to improve selected hand functions of chronic stroke. Neuro Rehabil. 2003;18:215–225.
    1. DeMets DL. In: Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. Armitage P, Colton T, editor. Chichester: Wiley; 1998. Data and safety monitoring boards; pp. 1066–1071.
    1. Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, Sharit J. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Psychol Aging. 2006;21:333–352.
    1. Charness N, Fox MC, Mitchum AL. In: Handbook of Lifespan Psychology. Fingerman K, Berg C, Antonnuci T, Smith J, editor. New York: Springer; 2010. Lifespan cognition and information technology.
    1. Callahan JS, Kiker DS, Cross T. Does method matter? A meta-analysis of the effects of training method on older learner training performance. J Manag. 2003;29:663–680.
    1. Jay GM, Willis SL. Influence of direct computer experience on older adults’ attitude toward computers. J Gerontol Psychol Sci. 1992;47:P250–P257.
    1. Wheelchair Skills Training Program. Wheelchair Specifications Form. [ ]
    1. Molloy D, Alemayehu E, Roberts R. Reliability of a standardized mini-mental state examination compared with the traditional mini-mental state examination. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:102–105.
    1. Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of Clinical Trials. 4. New York: Springer Science + Business Media; 2010.
    1. Kilkens OJ, Post MW, Dallmeijer AJ, Seelen HA, van der Woude LH. Wheelchair skills tests: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:418–430. doi: 10.1191/0269215503cr633oa.
    1. Kirby RL, Swuste J, Dupuis DJ, MacLeod DA, Monroe R. The wheelchair skills test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:10–18. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.26823.
    1. Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, Whiteneck G, Bogner J, Rodriguez E. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1445–1460. doi: 10.1080/09638280701625534.
    1. Hoenig H, Giacobbi P, Levy CE. Methodological challenges confronting researchers of wheeled mobility aids and other assistive technologies. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:159–168. doi: 10.1080/17483100701374405.
    1. Mallinson T, Fischer H. Rehabilitation research. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64:506–514. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.09080.
    1. Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Auger C. Issues for the selection of wheelchair-specific activity and participation outcome measures: a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1177–1186. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.010.
    1. Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technol Disabil. 2002;14:101–105.
    1. Rushton PW, Miller WC. Development of an assessment to measure self-efficacy with wheelchair mobility [abstract] Can J Occup Therap. 2009;76 [ ]
    1. Sakakibara B, Miller WC, Souza M, Nikolova V, Best KL. Wheelchair skills training to improve confidence with using a manual wheelchair among older adults: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1031–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.016.
    1. Rushton PW, Miller WC, Lee Kirby R, Eng JJ, Yip J. Development and content validation of the wheelchair use confidence scale: a mixed-methods study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:57–66. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2010.512970.
    1. Rushton PW, Miller WC, Mortenson WB, Garden J. Satisfaction with participation using a manual wheelchair among individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:691–696. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.197.
    1. Auger C, Demers L, Gelinas I, Miller WC, Jutai JW, Noreau L. Life-space mobility of middle-aged and older adults at various stages of usage of power mobility devices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:765–773. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.018.
    1. Auger C, Demers L, Gelinas I, Routhier F, Jutai J, Guerette C, Deruyter F. Development of a French-Canadian version of the Life- Space Assessment (LSA-F): content validity, reliability and applicability for power mobility device users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009;4:31–41. doi: 10.1080/17483100802543064.
    1. Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D. Health utility estimation. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2002;2:99–108. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2.2.99.
    1. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies: Canada. 3. Ottawa; 2006.
    1. Jones CA, Feeny D, Eng K. Test-retest reliability of health utilities index scores: evidence from hip fracture. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:393–398.
    1. Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G. The Health Utilities Index: concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:54. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-54.
    1. Giesbrecht E, Miller WC. Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America Conference Proceedings: 20–24 June 2013. Bellevue, WA; 2013. Development of the wheeling while talking test. [ ]
    1. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc; 2007.
    1. Borm GF, Fransen J, Lemmens WA. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:1234–1238. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.02.006.
    1. Dimitrov DM, Rumrill PD. Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work. 2003;20:159–165.
    1. Overall JE, Spiegel DK. Concerning least squares analysis of experimental data. Psychol Bull. 1969;72:311–322.
    1. Moncur R, Larmer J. Clinical applicability of intention-to-treat analyses. McMaster Univ Med J. 2009;6:39–41.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera