Melphalan 140 mg/m2 or 200 mg/m2 for autologous transplantation in myeloma: results from the Collaboration to Collect Autologous Transplant Outcomes in Lymphoma and Myeloma (CALM) study. A report by the EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party

Holger W Auner, Simona Iacobelli, Giulia Sbianchi, Cora Knol-Bout, Didier Blaise, Nigel H Russell, Jane F Apperley, David Pohlreich, Paul V Browne, Guido Kobbe, Cecilia Isaksson, Stig Lenhoff, Christof Scheid, Cyrille Touzeau, Esa Jantunen, Achilles Anagnostopoulos, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha, Alina Tanase, Nicolaas Schaap, Wieslaw Wiktor-Jedrzejczak, Marta Krejci, Stefan O Schönland, Curly Morris, Laurent Garderet, Nicolaus Kröger, Holger W Auner, Simona Iacobelli, Giulia Sbianchi, Cora Knol-Bout, Didier Blaise, Nigel H Russell, Jane F Apperley, David Pohlreich, Paul V Browne, Guido Kobbe, Cecilia Isaksson, Stig Lenhoff, Christof Scheid, Cyrille Touzeau, Esa Jantunen, Achilles Anagnostopoulos, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha, Alina Tanase, Nicolaas Schaap, Wieslaw Wiktor-Jedrzejczak, Marta Krejci, Stefan O Schönland, Curly Morris, Laurent Garderet, Nicolaus Kröger

Abstract

Melphalan at a dose of 200 mg/m2 is standard conditioning prior to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma, but a dose of 140 mg/m2 is often used in clinical practice in patients perceived to be at risk of excess toxicity. To determine whether melphalan 200 mg/m2 and melphalan 140 mg/m2 are equally effective and tolerable in clinically relevant patient subgroups we analyzed 1964 first single autologous transplantation episodes using a series of Cox proportional-hazards models. Overall survival, progression-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse mortality, hematopoietic recovery and second primary malignancy rates were not significantly different between the melphalan 140 mg/m2 (n=245) and melphalan 200 mg/m2 (n=1719) groups. Multivariable subgroup analysis showed that disease status at transplantation interacted with overall survival, progression-free survival, and cumulative incidence of relapse, with a significant advantage associated with melphalan 200 mg/m2 in patients transplanted in less than partial response (adjusted hazard ratios for melphalan 200 mg/m2versus melphalan 140 mg/m2: 0.5, 0.54, and 0.56). In contrast, transplantation in very good partial or complete response significantly favored melphalan 140 mg/m2 for overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.02). Age, renal function, prior proteasome inhibitor treatment, gender, or Karnofsky score did not interact with overall/progression-free survival or relapse rate in the melphalan dose groups. There were no significant survival or relapse rate differences between melphalan 200 mg/m2 and melphalan 140 mg/m2 patients with high-risk or standard-risk chromosomal abnormalities. In conclusion, remission status at the time of transplantation may favor the use of melphalan 200 mg/m2 or melphalan 140 mg/m2 for key transplant outcomes (NCT01362972).

Copyright© 2018 Ferrata Storti Foundation.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overall survival after autologous stem cell transplantation for patients who received conditioning with melphalan 140 mg/m2 (Mel140) or 200 mg/m2 (Mel200). (A) Kaplan-Meier curves. (B) Multivariate analyses. The overall hazard ratio and corresponding P value (bottom line) refers to the comparison between Mel140 and Mel200 performed in a Cox model without interactions; the other hazard ratios and P values refer to interaction terms between melphalan dose and the indicated factors. All comparisons are adjusted for: age at transplant, renal function, prior proteasome inhibitor treatment, gender, status of disease, and Karnofsky score. CR/VGPR: complete response/very good partial response; PR: partial response.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Progression-free survival after autologous stem cell transplantation for patients who received conditioning with melphalan 140 mg/m2 (Mel140) or 200 mg/m2 (Mel200). (A) Kaplan-Meier curves. (B) Multivariate analyses. The overall hazard ratio and corresponding P value (bottom line) refers to the comparison between Mel140 and Mel200 performed in a Cox model without interactions; the other hazard ratios and P values refer to interaction terms between melphalan dose and the indicated factors. All comparisons are adjusted for: age at transplant, renal function, prior proteasome inhibitor treatment, gender, status of disease, and Karnofsky score. CR/VGPR: complete response/very good partial response; PR: partial response.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cumulative incidence of relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation for patients who received conditioning with melphalan 140 mg/m2 (Mel140) or 200 mg/m2 (Mel200). (A) Kaplan-Meier curves. (B) Multivariate analyses. The overall hazard ratio and corresponding P-value (bottom line) refers to the comparison between Mel140 and Mel200 performed in a Cox model without interactions; the other hazard ratios and P values refer to interaction terms between melphalan dose and the indicated factors. All comparisons are adjusted for: age at transplant, renal function, prior proteasome inhibitor treatment, gender, status of disease, and Karnofsky score. CR/VGPR: complete response/very good partial response; PR: partial response.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Survival and relapse risk by cytogenetic risk. (A) Overall survival, (B) progression-free survival and (C) relapse risk estimates and confidence intervals at 2 years after ASCT are shown for patients with high-risk or standard-risk chromosomal abnormalities.

References

    1. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francais du Myelome. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(2):91–97.
    1. Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(19):1875–1883.
    1. Palumbo A, Cavallo F, Gay F, et al. Autologous transplantation and maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(10):895–905.
    1. Gay F, Oliva S, Petrucci MT, et al. Chemotherapy plus lenalidomide versus autologous transplantation, followed by lenalidomide plus prednisone versus lenalidomide maintenance, in patients with multiple myeloma: a randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(16):1617–1629.
    1. Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Hulin C, et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone with transplantation for myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(14):1311–1320.
    1. Gay F, Oliva S, Petrucci MT, et al. Autologous transplant vs oral chemotherapy and lenalidomide in newly diagnosed young myeloma patients: a pooled analysis. Leukemia. 2017;31(8):1727–1734.
    1. Auner HW, Szydlo R, Hoek J, et al. Trends in autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in Europe: increased use and improved outcomes in elderly patients in recent years. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50(2):209–215.
    1. Costa LJ, Zhang MJ, Zhong X, et al. Trends in utilization and outcomes of autologous transplantation as early therapy for multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(11):1615–1624.
    1. Facon T, Mary JY, Hulin C, et al. Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide versus melphalan and prednisone alone or reduced-intensity autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (IFM 99-06): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9594):1209–1218.
    1. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Petrucci MT, et al. Intermediate-dose melphalan improves survival of myeloma patients aged 50 to 70: results of a randomized controlled trial. Blood. 2004;104(10):3052–3057.
    1. Lahuerta JJ, Mateos MV, Martinez-Lopez J, et al. Busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m2 versus melphalan 200 mg/m2 as conditioning regimens for autologous transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients included in the PETHE-MA/GEM2000 study. Haematologica. 2010;95(11):1913–1920.
    1. Moreau P, Facon T, Attal M, et al. Comparison of 200 mg/m(2) melphalan and 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m(2) melphalan as conditioning regimens for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome 9502 randomized trial. Blood. 2002;99(3):731–735.
    1. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Bruno B, et al. Melphalan 200 mg/m(2) versus melphalan 100 mg/m(2) in newly diagnosed myeloma patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 3 study. Blood. 2010;115(10):1873–1879.
    1. Jagannath S, Vesole DH, Glenn L, Crowley J, Barlogie B. Low-risk intensive therapy for multiple myeloma with combined autologous bone marrow and blood stem cell support. Blood. 1992;80(7):1666–1672.
    1. Shah N, Callander N, Ganguly S, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: guidelines from the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(7):1155–1166.
    1. Giralt S. 200 mg/m(2) melphalan--the gold standard for multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7(9):490–491.
    1. Badros A, Barlogie B, Siegel E, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly multiple myeloma patients over the age of 70 years. Br J Haematol. 2001;114(3):600–607.
    1. Badros A, Barlogie B, Siegel E, et al. Results of autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma patients with renal failure. Br J Haematol. 2001;114(4):822–829.
    1. Sweiss K, Patel S, Culos K, Oh A, Rondelli D, Patel P. Melphalan 200 mg/m2 in patients with renal impairment is associated with increased short-term toxicity but improved response and longer treatment-free survival. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51(10):1337–1341.
    1. Katragadda L, McCullough LM, Dai Y, et al. Effect of melphalan 140 mg/m(2) vs 200 mg/m(2) on toxicities and outcomes in multiple myeloma patients undergoing single autologous stem cell transplantation-a single center experience. Clin Transplant. 2016;30(8):894–900.
    1. Dhakal B, Nelson A, Guru Murthy GS, et al. Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: effect of age. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017;17(3):165–172.
    1. Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, et al. Impact of age and serum creatinine value on outcome after autologous blood stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;39(10):605–611.
    1. Kumar SK, Dingli D, Lacy MQ, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation in patients of 70 years and older with multiple myeloma: results from a matched pair analysis. Am J Hematol. 2008;83(8):614–617.
    1. Garderet L, Beohou E, Caillot D, et al. Upfront autologous stem cell transplantation for newly diagnosed elderly multiple myeloma patients: a prospective multicenter study. Haematologica. 2016;101(11):1390–1397.
    1. Dimopoulos MA, Terpos E, Chanan-Khan A, et al. Renal impairment in patients with multiple myeloma: a consensus statement on behalf of the International Myeloma Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(33):4976–4984.
    1. Muchtar E, Dingli D, Kumar S, et al. Autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma patients 70 years or older. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51(11):1449–1455.
    1. Moreau P, San Miguel J, Sonneveld P, et al. Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(suppl_4):iv52–iv61.
    1. Cavo M, Petrucci MT, Di Raimondo F, et al. Upfront single versus double autologous stem cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an intergroup, multicenter, phase III study of the European Myeloma Network (EMN02/HO95 MM Trial). Blood. 2016;128(22):991.
    1. Nath CE, Shaw PJ, Trotman J, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of melphalan in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing high dose therapy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;69(5):484–497.
    1. Shaw PJ, Nath CE, Lazarus HM. Not too little, not too much-just right! (better ways to give high dose melphalan). Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49(12):1457–1465.
    1. Nath CE, Trotman J, Tiley C, et al. High melphalan exposure is associated with improved overall survival in myeloma patients receiving high dose melphalan and autologous transplantation. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;82(1):149–159.
    1. Merz M, Neben K, Raab MS, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation for elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(1):189–195.
    1. Bashir Q, Shah N, Parmar S, et al. Feasibility of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients aged >/=70 years with multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2012;53(1):118–122.
    1. Auner HW, Garderet L, Kroger N. Autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2015;171(4):453–462.
    1. Straka C, Liebisch P, Salwender H, et al. Autotransplant with and without induction chemotherapy in older multiple myeloma patients: long-term outcome of a randomized trial. Haematologica. 2016;101(11):1398–1406.
    1. Engelhardt M, Ihorst G, Caers J, Gunther A, Wasch R. Autotransplants in older multiple myeloma patients: hype or hope in the era of novel agents? Haematologica. 2016;101(11):1276–1278.
    1. Zweegman S, Engelhardt M, Larocca A, EHA SWG on “Aging and Hematology”. Elderly patients with multiple myeloma: towards a frailty approach? Curr Opin Oncol. 2017;29(5):315–321.
    1. Engelhardt M, Domm AS, Dold SM, et al. A concise revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index as a valid prognostic instrument in a large cohort of 801 multiple myeloma patients. Haematologica. 2017;102(5):910–921.
    1. Bruno B, Auner HW, Gahrton G, et al. Stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders (report from an EBMT preceptorship meeting). Leuk Lymphoma. 2016;57(6):1256–1268.
    1. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Mateos MV, et al. Geriatric assessment predicts survival and toxicities in elderly myeloma patients: an International Myeloma Working Group report. Blood. 2015;125(13):2068–2074.
    1. Roussel M, Moreau P, Huynh A, et al. Bortezomib and high-dose melphalan as conditioning regimen before autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with de novo multiple myeloma: a phase 2 study of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM). Blood. 2010;115(1):32–37.
    1. Blanes M, Lahuerta JJ, Gonzalez JD, et al. Intravenous busulfan and melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a matched comparison to a melphalan-only approach. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(1):69–74.
    1. Rodriguez TE, Hari P, Stiff PJ, Smith SE, Sterrenberg D, Vesole DH. Busulfan, melphalan, and bortezomib versus high-dose melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(8):1391–1396.
    1. Nieto Y, Valdez BC, Pingali SR, et al. High-dose gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan for autologous stem-cell transplant in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma: a phase 2 trial and matched-pair comparison with melphalan. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4(6):e283–e292.
    1. Morgan GJ, Rasche L. Haematological cancer: Where are we now with the treatment of multiple myeloma? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(8):461–462.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera