Dementia Population Risk Tool (DemPoRT): study protocol for a predictive algorithm assessing dementia risk in the community

Stacey Fisher, Amy Hsu, Nassim Mojaverian, Monica Taljaard, Gregory Huyer, Douglas G Manuel, Peter Tanuseputro, Stacey Fisher, Amy Hsu, Nassim Mojaverian, Monica Taljaard, Gregory Huyer, Douglas G Manuel, Peter Tanuseputro

Abstract

Introduction: The burden of disease from dementia is a growing global concern as incidence increases dramatically with age, and average life expectancy has been increasing around the world. Planning for an ageing population requires reliable projections of dementia prevalence; however, existing population projections are simple and have poor predictive accuracy. The Dementia Population Risk Tool (DemPoRT) will predict incidence of dementia in the population setting using multivariable modelling techniques and will be used to project dementia prevalence.

Methods and analysis: The derivation cohort will consist of elderly Ontario respondents of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) (2001, 2003, 2005 and 2007; 18 764 males and 25 288 females). Prespecified predictors include sociodemographic, general health, behavioural, functional and health condition variables. Incident dementia will be identified through individual linkage of survey respondents to population-level administrative healthcare databases (1797 and 3281 events, and 117 795 and 166 573 person-years of follow-up, for males and females, respectively, until 31 March 2014). Using time of first dementia capture as the primary outcome and death as a competing risk, sex-specific proportional hazards regression models will be estimated. The 2008/2009 CCHS survey will be used for validation (approximately 4600 males and 6300 females). Overall calibration and discrimination will be assessed as well as calibration within predefined subgroups of importance to clinicians and policy makers.

Ethics and dissemination: Research ethics approval has been granted by the Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board. DemPoRT results will be submitted for publication in peer-review journals and presented at scientific meetings. The algorithm will be assessable online for both population and individual uses.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03155815, pre-results.

Keywords: dementia; health behavior; population projection; risk stratification.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

References

    1. Brookmeyer R, Gray S, Kawas C. Projections of Alzheimer’s disease in the United States and the public health impact of delaying disease onset. Am J Public Health 1998;88:1337–42. 10.2105/AJPH.88.9.1337
    1. Brayne C. The elephant in the room - healthy brains in later life, epidemiology and public health. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007;8:233–9. 10.1038/nrn2091
    1. Norton S, Matthews FE, Brayne C. A commentary on studies presenting projections of the future prevalence of dementia. BMC Public Health 2013;13:1 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1
    1. Sloane PD, Zimmerman S, Suchindran C, et al. . The public health impact of Alzheimer’s disease, 2000-2050: potential implication of treatment advances. Annu Rev Public Health 2002;23:213–31. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140525
    1. Mura T, Dartigues JF, Berr C. How many dementia cases in France and Europe? Alternative projections and scenarios 2010-2050. Eur J Neurol 2010;17:252–9. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02783.x
    1. Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Bienias JL, et al. . Alzheimer disease in the US population: prevalence estimates using the 2000 census. Arch Neurol 2003;60:1119–22. 10.1001/archneur.60.8.1119
    1. Brookmeyer R, Johnson E, Ziegler-Graham K, et al. . Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2007;3:186–91. 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.04.381
    1. Dewey ME, Chen CM. Neurosis and mortality in persons aged 65 and over living in the community: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004;19:554–7. 10.1002/gps.1128
    1. Norton S, Matthews FE, Barnes DE, et al. . Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: an analysis of population-based data. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:788–94. 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70136-X
    1. Joly P, Touraine C, Georget A, et al. . Prevalence projections of chronic diseases and impact of public health intervention. Biometrics 2013;69:109–17. 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01827.x
    1. Lee Y. The recent decline in prevalence of dementia in developed countries: implications for prevention in the Republic of Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2014;29:913–8. 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.7.913
    1. Barnes DE, Yaffe K. The projected effect of risk factor reduction on Alzheimer’s disease prevalence. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:819–28. 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70072-2
    1. Manuel DG, Tuna M, Hennessy D, et al. . Projections of preventable risks for cardiovascular disease in Canada to 2021: a microsimulation modelling approach. CMAJ Open 2014;2:E94–101. 10.9778/cmajo.2012-0015
    1. Tang EY, Harrison SL, Errington L, et al. . Current developments in dementia risk prediction modelling: an updated systematic review. PLoS One 2015;10:e0136181–31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0136181
    1. Stephan BC, Kurth T, Matthews FE, et al. . Dementia risk prediction in the population: are screening models accurate? Nat Rev Neurol 2010;6:318–26. 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.54
    1. Anstey KJ, Cherbuin N, Herath PM, et al. . A self-report risk index to predict occurrence of dementia in three independent cohorts of older adults: the ANU-ADRI. PLoS One 2014;9:e86141 10.1371/journal.pone.0086141
    1. Wolfsgruber S, Jessen F, Wiese B, et al. . The CERAD neuropsychological assessment battery total score detects and predicts Alzheimer disease dementia with high diagnostic accuracy. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2014;22:1017–28. 10.1016/j.jagp.2012.08.021
    1. Barnes DE, Covinsky KE, Whitmer RA, et al. . Predicting risk of dementia in older adults: the late-life dementia risk index. Neurology 2009;73:173–9. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a81636
    1. Chary E, Amieva H, Pérès K, et al. . Short- versus long-term prediction of dementia among subjects with low and high educational levels. Alzheimers Dement 2013;9:562–71. 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.2188
    1. Jessen F, Wiese B, Bickel H, et al. . AgeCoDe Study Group. Prediction of dementia in primary care patients. PLoS One 2011;6:e16852 10.1371/journal.pone.0016852
    1. Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Nontraditional risk factors combine to predict Alzheimer disease and dementia. Neurology 2011;77:227–34. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318225c6bc
    1. Tierney MC, Moineddin R, McDowell I. Prediction of all-cause dementia using neuropsychological tests within 10 and 5 years of diagnosis in a community-based sample. J Alzheimers Dis 2010;22:1231–40. 10.3233/JAD-2010-100516
    1. Meng X, D’Arcy C, Morgan D, et al. . Predicting the risk of dementia among Canadian seniors: a useable practice-friendly diagnostic algorithm. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2013;27:23–9. 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318247a0dc
    1. Kivipelto M, Ngandu T, Laatikainen T, et al. . Risk score for the prediction of dementia risk in 20 years among middle aged people: a longitudinal, population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:735–41. 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70537-3
    1. Reitz C, Tang MX, Schupf N, et al. . A summary risk score for the prediction of Alzheimer disease in elderly persons. Arch Neurol 2010;67:835–41. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.136
    1. Walters K, Hardoon S, Petersen I, et al. . Predicting dementia risk in primary care: development and validation of the Dementia Risk Score using routinely collected data. BMC Med 2016;14:1–12. 10.1186/s12916-016-0549-y
    1. Béland Y. Canadian community health survey-methodological overview. Heal. reports / Statanada, Can. Cent. Heal. Inf. = Rapp. sur la sant?? / Stat. Canada, Cen.Ct. Can. d’information sur la sant?? Health Rep 2002;13:9–14.
    1. Jaakkimainen RL, Bronskill SE, Tierney MC, et al. . Identification of physician-diagnosed alzheimer’s disease and related dementias in population-based administrative data: A validation study using family physicians' electronic medical records. J Alzheimers Dis 2016;54:337–49. 10.3233/JAD-160105
    1. Connolly A, Gaehl E, Martin H, et al. . Underdiagnosis of dementia in primary care: variations in the observed prevalence and comparisons to the expected prevalence. Aging Ment Health 2011;15:978–84. 10.1080/13607863.2011.596805
    1. Kosteniuk JG, Morgan DG, O’Connell ME, et al. . Incidence and prevalence of dementia in linked administrative health data in Saskatchewan, Canada: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Geriatr 2015;15:73 10.1186/s12877-015-0075-3
    1. Harrell FE. Regression Modeling Strategies with applicaitons to linear models, logistic regression and survival analysis. Springer 2001.
    1. Vergouwe Y, Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, et al. . Substantial effective sample sizes were required for external validation studies of predictive logistic regression models. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:475–83. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.017
    1. Steyerberg EW. Clinical Prediction Models. New York: Springer, 2009.
    1. Harrell FE. Hmisc: harrell miscellaneous. R package version, 2016. 4.0-2.
    1. Core Team R. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, 2016.
    1. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, et al. . Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Eur Urol 2015;67:1142–51. 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025
    1. Exalto LG, Quesenberry CP, Barnes D, et al. . Midlife risk score for the prediction of dementia four decades later. Alzheimers Dement 2014;10:562–70. 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.05.1772
    1. Exalto LG, Biessels GJ, Karter AJ, et al. . Risk score for prediction of 10 year dementia risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2013;1:183–90. 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70048-2
    1. Taljaard M, Tuna M, Bennett C, et al. . Cardiovascular Disease Population Risk Tool (CVDPoRT): predictive algorithm for assessing CVD risk in the community setting. A study protocol. BMJ Open 2014;4:e006701 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006701
    1. Manuel DG, Perez R, Sanmartin C, et al. . Measuring burden of unhealthy behaviours using a multivariable predictive approach: life expectancy lost in Canada attributable to smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity, and diet. PLoS Med 2016;13:e1002082:27 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002082
    1. Pampalon R, Hamel D, Gamache P, et al. . A deprivation index for health planning in Canada. Chronic Dis Can 2009;29:178–91.
    1. Rubin DB, Schenker N. Multiple imputation in health-care databases: an overview and some applications. Stat Med 1991;10:585–98. 10.1002/sim.4780100410
    1. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM, Fleming TR. Martingale-based residuals for survival models. Biometrika 1990;77:147–60. 10.1093/biomet/77.1.147
    1. Allison PD. Survival analysis using SAS : a practical guide. SAS Institute 2010.
    1. Van Houwelingen JC, Le Cessie S. Predictive value of statistical models. Stat Med 1990;9:1303–25. 10.1002/sim.4780091109
    1. Ambler G, Brady AR, Royston P. Simplifying a prognostic model: a simulation study based on clinical data. Stat Med 2002;21:3803–22. 10.1002/sim.1422
    1. Nagelkerke NJD. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 1991;78:691–2. 10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
    1. Arkes HR, Dawson NV, Speroff T, et al. . The covariance decomposition of the probability score and its use in evaluating prognostic estimates. SUPPORT Investigators. Med Decis Making 1995;15:120–31. 10.1177/0272989X9501500204
    1. Cook NR. Statistical evaluation of prognostic versus diagnostic models: beyond the ROC curve. Clin Chem 2008;54:17–23. 10.1373/clinchem.2007.096529
    1. Cook NR. Comment: Measures to summarize and compare the predictive capacity of markers. Int J Biostat 2010;6:Article 22; discussion Article 25 10.2202/1557-4679.1257
    1. Krause J, Perer A, Bertini E. Using Visual Analytics to Interpret Predictive Machine Learning Models arXiv Prepr. arXiv1606 2016;05685.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera