Do medical house officers value the health of veterans differently from the health of non-veterans?

Michael S Yi, Sara Luckhaupt, Joseph M Mrus, Joel Tsevat, Michael S Yi, Sara Luckhaupt, Joseph M Mrus, Joel Tsevat

Abstract

Background: Little information is available regarding medical residents' perceptions of patients' health-related quality of life. Patients cared for by residents have been shown to receive differing patterns of care at Veterans Affairs facilities than at community or university settings. We therefore examined: 1) how resident physicians value the health of patients; 2) whether values differ if the patient is described as a veteran; and 3) whether residency-associated variables impact values.

Methods: All medicine residents in a teaching hospital were asked to watch a digital video of an actor depicting a 72-year-old patient with mild-moderate congestive heart failure. Residents were randomized to 2 groups: in one group, the patient was described as a veteran of the Korean War, and in the other, he was referred to only as a male. The respondents assessed the patient's health state using 4 measures: rating scale (RS), time tradeoff (TTO), standard gamble (SG), and willingness to pay (WTP). We also ascertained residents' demographics, risk attitudes, residency program type, post-graduate year level, current rotation, experience in a Veterans Affairs hospital, and how many days it had been since they were last on call. We performed univariate and multivariable analyses using the RS, TTO, SG and WTP as dependent variables.

Results: Eighty-one residents (89.0% of eligible) participated, with 36 (44.4%) viewing the video of the veteran and 45 (55.6%) viewing the video of the non-veteran. Their mean (SD) age was 28.7 (3.1) years; 51.3% were female; and 67.5% were white. There were no differences in residents' characteristics or in RS, TTO, SG and WTP scores between the veteran and non-veteran groups. The mean RS score was 0.60 (0.14); the mean TTO score was 0.80 (0.20); the mean SG score was 0.91 (0.10); and the median (25th, 75th percentile) WTP was 10,000 dollars (7600 dollars, 20,000 dollars) per year. In multivariable analyses, being a resident in the categorical program was associated with assigning higher RS scores, but no residency-associated variables were associated with the TTO, SG or WTP scores.

Conclusion: Physicians in training appear not to be biased either in favor of or against military veterans when judging the value of a patient's health.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histogram of Willingness to Pay Amounts. Histogram depicting the dollar amount respondents felt society should be willing to pay per year for an imagined therapy to restore perfect health to the hypothetical patient. The X-axis displays the multiples of the average per capita healthcare expenditures for non-institutionalized US citizens over the age of 65 ($7600), and the Y-axis shows the number of respondents.

References

    1. Tsevat J, Weeks JC, Guadagnoli E, Tosteson AN, Mangione CM, Pliskin JS, Weinstein MC, Cleary PD. Using health-related quality-of-life information: clinical encounters, clinical trials, and health policy. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:576–582.
    1. Beausoleil JL, Zalneraitis EL, Gregorio DI, Healey JM. The influence of education and experience on ethical attitudes in neonatal intensive care. Med Decis Making. 1994;14:403–408.
    1. Rubenstein LV, McCoy JM, Cope DW, Barrett PA, Hirsch SH, Messer KS, Young RT. Improving patient quality of life with feedback to physicians about functional status. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:607–614.
    1. Sprangers MA, Aaronson NK. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: a review. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:743–760.
    1. Calkins DR, Rubenstein LV, Cleary PD, Davies AR, Jette AM, Fink A, Kosecoff J, Young RT, Brook RH, Delbanco TL. Failure of physicians to recognize functional disability in ambulatory patients. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:451–454.
    1. Starr TJ, Pearlman RA, Uhlmann RF. Quality of life and resuscitation decisions in elderly patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:373–379.
    1. Wilson IB, Green ML, Goldman L, Tsevat J, Cook EF, Phillips RS. Is experience a good teacher? How interns and attending physicians understand patients' choices for end-of-life care. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Med Decis Making. 1997;17:217–227.
    1. Lenert LA, Ziegler J, Lee T, Unfred C, Mahmoud R. The risks of multimedia methods: effects of actor's race and gender on preferences for health states. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:177–185.
    1. Rathore SS, Lenert LA, Weinfurt KP, Tinoco A, Taleghani CK, Harless W, Schulman KA. The effects of patient sex and race on medical students' ratings of quality of life. Am J Med. 2000;108:561–566. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00352-1.
    1. Schulman KA, Berlin JA, Harless W, Kerner JF, Sistrunk S, Gersh BJ, Dube R, Taleghani CK, Burke JE, Williams S, Eisenberg JM, Escarce JJ. The effect of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:618–626. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199902253400806.
    1. McKinlay JB, Potter DA, Feldman HA. Non-medical influences on medical decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42:769–776. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00342-8.
    1. Hawley LE, Shear CL, Stark AM, Goodman PR. Resident and parental perceptions of adolescent problems and family communications in a low socioeconomic population. J Fam Pract. 1984;19:651–655.
    1. Weitzman CC, Freudigman K, Schonfeld DJ, Leventhal JM. Care to underserved children: Residents' attitudes and experiences. Pediatrics. 2000;106:1022–1027.
    1. Rogers JL, Feinglass J, Martin GJ, Hughes RL, Handler I, Stoms GB. Longer hospitalization at Veterans Administration hospitals than private hospitals. Verification and additional insights. Med Care. 1989;27:928–936.
    1. Bennett CL, Ullman M, Dickinson GM, Horner RD, Feinglass J, Curtis JR. Patterns of care for HIV-related Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in a university medical program: a case study. Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1996;4:186–189.
    1. Rector TS, Cohn JN. Assessment of patient outcome with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire: reliability and validity during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pimobendan. Pimobendan Multicenter Research Group. Am Heart J. 1992;124:1017–1025. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90986-6.
    1. Harrison MB, Browne GB, Roberts J, Tugwell P, Gafni A, Graham ID. Quality of life of individuals with heart failure: a randomized trial of the effectiveness of two models of hospital-to-home transition. Med Care. 2002;40:271–282. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200204000-00003.
    1. Levy D, Kenchaiah S, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Kupka MJ, Ho KK, Murabito JM, Vasan RS. Long-term trends in the incidence of and survival with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1397–1402. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020265.
    1. Ross PL, Littenberg B, Fearn P, Scardino PT, Karakiewicz PI, Kattan MW. Paper standard gamble: a paper-based measure of standard gamble utility for current health. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19:135–147. doi: 10.1017/S0266462303000138.
    1. Littenberg B, Partilo S, Licata A, Kattan MW. Paper Standard Gamble: the reliability of a paper questionnaire to assess utility. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:480–488. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03259817.
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. PUF Data Files. Rockville; 2002. 2002 Projected MEPS expenditures US civilian non-institutionalized population.
    1. Pearson SD, Goldman L, Orav EJ, Guadagnoli E, Garcia TB, Johnson PA, Lee TH. Triage decisions for emergency department patients with chest pain: do physicians' risk attitudes make the difference? J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:557–564.
    1. Owens DK, Cardinalli AB, Nease R. F., Jr. Physicians' assessments of the utility of health states associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Qual Life Res. 1997;6:77–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1026473613487.
    1. Lenert L, Kaplan RM. Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health- related quality of life. Med Care. 2000;38:II138–50.
    1. Gold MR, Patrick DL, Torrance GW, Fryback DG, Hadorn DC, Kamlet MS, Daniels N, Weinstein MC. Identifying and Valuing Outcomes. In: Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB and Weinstein MC, editor. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York, NY, Oxford University Press; 1996. pp. 82–134.
    1. Goldstein MK, Tsevat J. Applying utility assessment at the bedside. In: Chapman Gretchen B and Sonnenberg Frank A, editor. Decision making in health care : theory, psychology, and applications. New York, Cambridge University Press; 2000. pp. 313–333.
    1. Tsevat J. What do utilities measure? Med Care. 2000;38:II160–4. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200009002-00024.
    1. Cykert S, Joines JD, Kissling G, Hansen CJ. Racial differences in patients' perceptions of debilitated health states. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:217–222. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00320.x.
    1. Saigal S, Stoskopf BL, Feeny D, Furlong W, Burrows E, Rosenbaum PL, Hoult L. Differences in preferences for neonatal outcomes among health care professionals, parents, and adolescents. JAMA. 1999;281:1991–1997. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.21.1991.
    1. Grootendorst P, Feeny D, Furlong W. Health Utilities Index Mark 3: evidence of construct validity for stroke and arthritis in a population health survey. Med Care. 2000;38:290–299. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200003000-00006.
    1. Walters SJ, Brazier JE. What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:4. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-4.
    1. Samsa G, Edelman D, Rothman ML, Williams GR, Lipscomb J, Matchar D. Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;15:141–155.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera