Dissemination of discharge summaries. Not reaching follow-up physicians

Carl van Walraven, Ratika Seth, Andreas Laupacis, Carl van Walraven, Ratika Seth, Andreas Laupacis

Abstract

Objective: To discover how often hospital discharge summaries were available to physicians seeing patients for follow-up visits after hospitalization.

Design: Cohort study.

Setting: Teaching hospital in Ottawa, Ont.

Participants: We studied 792 patients discharged from an internal medicine service after treatment for acute illness. We determined when and by which physician each patient was seen during the first 6 months after discharge. We also determined the date each patient's discharge summary was printed and the physicians to whom it was sent. We confirmed that summaries were received by means of a survey or by telephoning physicians' offices. Patients were observed for 6 months or until they were readmitted to hospital.

Main outcome measures: Proportion of follow-up visits to physicians for which discharge summaries were available.

Results: During the observation period, patients made 6619 visits (median six per patient, interquartile range [IQR] 2 to 9) to 914 different physicians (median three per patient, IQR 2 to 4). Discharge summaries were available for only 996 (15%) visits. Summaries were available for only 65 initial visits (8.2%); no summaries were available for any visit for 542 (68.4%) patients. Summaries were most commonly unavailable because they were not generated in time for follow-up visits (20.0%) or were not sent to follow-up physicians (50.8%).

Conclusion: At our institution, discharge summaries often did not get to physicians seeing patients after discharge from hospital.

References

    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Nov 15;293(6557):1283-4
    1. Br Med J. 1974 Nov 23;4(5942):456-9
    1. BMJ. 1988 Jul 2;297(6640):28-9
    1. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Nov;37(304):494-5
    1. Br J Hosp Med. 1989 Jul;42(1):59-61
    1. J Gen Intern Med. 1989 Sep-Oct;4(5):453-6
    1. Lancet. 1991 Oct 12;338(8772):923-5
    1. BMJ. 1992 Oct 31;305(6861):1068-70
    1. CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1437-42
    1. CMAJ. 1997 Jan 1;156(1):49-51
    1. BMJ. 1998 Feb 28;316(7132):642
    1. J Qual Clin Pract. 1998 Dec;18(4):241-7
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Feb 16;130(4 Pt 2):338-42
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Feb 16;130(4 Pt 2):343-9
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Feb 16;130(4 Pt 2):368-72
    1. CMAJ. 1999 Feb 9;160(3):319-26
    1. Am J Med Qual. 1999 Jul-Aug;14(4):160-9
    1. Can Fam Physician. 1999 Dec;45:2893-9
    1. J Eval Clin Pract. 2000 May;6(2):215-24
    1. Health Bull (Edinb). 1970 Apr;28(2):75-80
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Dec 12;295(6612):1523-5

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera